Cited by 145Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentCancer Cells and MetastasisPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer

FAK activity sustains intrinsic and acquired ovarian cancer resistance to platinum chemotherapy

Open access
Diaz Osterman, Carlos J, Ozmadenci, Duygu, Kleinschmidt, Elizabeth G, Taylor, Kristin N, Barrie, Allison M, Jiang, Shulin, Bean, Lisa M, Sulzmaier, Florian J +23 more·2019·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Gene copy number alterations, tumor cell stemness, and the development of platinum chemotherapy resistance contribute to high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) recurrence. Stem phenotypes involving Wnt-β-catenin, aldehyde dehydrogenase activities, intrinsic platinum resistance, and tumorsphere formation are here associated with spontaneous gains in Kras, Myc and FAK (KMF) genes in a new aggressive murine model of ovarian cancer. Adhesion-independent FAK signaling sustained KMF and human tumorsphere proliferation as well as resistance to cisplatin cytotoxicity. Platinum-resistant tumorspheres can acquire a dependence on FAK for growth. Accordingly, increased FAK tyrosine phosphorylation was observed within HGSOC patient tumors surviving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Combining a FAK inhibitor with platinum overcame chemoresistance and triggered cell apoptosis. FAK transcriptomic analyses across knockout and reconstituted cells identified 135 targets, elevated in HGSOC, that were regulated by FAK activity and β-catenin including Myc, pluripotency and DNA repair genes. These studies reveal an oncogenic FAK signaling role supporting chemoresistance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.47327

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diaz Osterman, C. J., Ozmadenci, D., Kleinschmidt, E. G., Taylor, K. N., Barrie, A. M., Jiang, S., Bean, L. M., Sulzmaier, F. J., Jean, C., Tancioni, I., Anderson, K., Uryu, S., Cordasco, E. A., Li, J., Chen, X. L., Fu, G., Ojalill, M., Rappu, P., Heino, J., Mark, A. M., Xu, G., Fisch, K. M., Kolev, V. N., Weaver, D. T., Pachter, J. A., Győrffy, B., McHale, M. T., Connolly, D. C., Molinolo, A., Stupack, D. G., & Schlaepfer, D. D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, United States
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Verastem (United States) (US)
  • Semmelweis University (HU)
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Stupack, Dwayne G
  • Schlaepfer, David D
Venue
eLife
Published
2019-09-03
Volume
8
Pages
e47327
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971694758
Cited by
145
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
15.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Semmelweis University Repository (Semmelweis University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (RO1 CA180769, RO1 CA102310, RO1 CA107263, T32 CA121938, P30 CA023100, UL1 TR001442, T36 GM095349, P30 CA006927, RO1 CA195723)
  • United States Department of Defense (W81XWH-16-1-0142, W81XWH-19-1-0134)
  • Medical Research Council of Hungary (NVKP_16-1-2016-0037, 2018-1.3.1-VKE-2018-00032, KH-129581)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Keywords
focal adhesion kinase, platinum resistance, high-grade serous ovarian cancer, chemoresistance, KRAS, c-Myc, FAK tyrosine phosphorylation, tumor spheres, aldehyde dehydrogenase, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, FAK inhibitors, cisplatin, copy number alterations, cancer stemness, DNA repair genes, pluripotency genes, apoptosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Cisplatin, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Platinum, Stem Cells, Signal Transduction, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Mice, Focal Adhesion Kinase 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review