CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 303interferon and immune responsesImmune Response and InflammationDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tight nuclear tethering of cGAS is essential for preventing autoreactivity

Open access
Volkman, Hannah E, Cambier, Stephanie, Gray, Elizabeth E, Stetson, Daniel B·2019·eLife
DOI 10.7554/elife.47491PMC PMC6927687
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

cGAS is an intracellular innate immune sensor that detects double-stranded DNA. The presence of billions of base pairs of genomic DNA in all nucleated cells raises the question of how cGAS is not constitutively activated. A widely accepted explanation for this is the sequestration of cGAS in the cytosol, which is thought to prevent cGAS from accessing nuclear DNA. Here, we demonstrate that endogenous cGAS is predominantly a nuclear protein, regardless of cell cycle phase or cGAS activation status. We show that nuclear cGAS is tethered tightly by a salt-resistant interaction. This tight tethering is independent of the domains required for cGAS activation, and it requires intact nuclear chromatin. We identify the evolutionarily conserved tethering surface on cGAS and we show that mutation of single amino acids within this surface renders cGAS massively and constitutively active against self-DNA. Thus, tight nuclear tethering maintains the resting state of cGAS and prevents autoreactivity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.47491

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Endogenous cGAS is predominantly a nuclear protein. (A) Clonal lines of HeLa cells were generated using lentiCRISPR encoding either a non-targeting H1 control gRNA (top row) or a cGAS-targeted gRNA (cGAS KO). Cells were fixed with methanol, stained with antibodies to human cGAS and beta-tubulin, counter-stained with DAPI, and visualized by confocal microscopy. (B) We noted three reproducible patterns of cGAS localization in addition to the nucleus: condensed mitotic chromatin (top row), structures resembling micronuclei (middle row), and tendril-like bridges between cells. (C) Mouse Cgas+/+ and Cgas-/- primary bone marrow-derived macrophages were stained using a mouse antibody to cGAS and processed as in (A).
Figure 1. Endogenous cGAS is predominantly a nuclear protein. (A) Clonal lines of HeLa cells were generated using lentiCRISPR encoding either a non-targeting H1 control gRNA (top row) or a cGAS-targeted gRNA (cGAS KO). Cells were fixed with methanol, stained with antibodies to human cGAS and beta-tubulin, counter-stained with DAPI, and visualized by confocal microscopy. (B) We noted three reproducible patterns of cGAS localization in addition to the nucleus: condensed mitotic chromatin (top row), structures resembling micronuclei (middle row), and tendril-like bridges between cells. (C) Mouse Cgas+/+ and Cgas-/- primary bone marrow-derived macrophages were stained using a mouse antibody to cGAS and processed as in (A).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Characterization of clonal cGAS KO HeLa cells and microscopy conditions for cGAS visualization. (A) HeLa cells were transduced with LentiCRISPR encoding H1 non-targeting control gRNA or cGAS-targeted gRNA, cloned by limiting dilution, and tested for production of cGAMP in cell lysates four hours after transfection of calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA). (B) Lysates from H1 control and cGAS KO clonal HeLa cells were separated into cytosol (C) and nuclear pellet (NP), and then blotted for endogenous cGAS. (C) H1 control and cGAS KO HeLa cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, and stained for endogenous cGAS. (D) cGAS KO HeLa cells were transduced with pSLIK lentivirus encoding doxycyline-inducible GFP-mouse cGAS (mcGAS), and then treated with doxycyline to induce GFP-mcGAS expression. Cells were then stained with DRAQ5 and visualized with an imaging flow cytometer (Amnis ImageStream). Representative images shown in (D). (E) Analysis of ImageStream data for thousands of individual cells showing percent nuclear and cytosolic localization of GFP-mcGAS.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Characterization of clonal cGAS KO HeLa cells and microscopy conditions for cGAS visualization. (A) HeLa cells were transduced with LentiCRISPR encoding H1 non-targeting control gRNA or cGAS-targeted gRNA, cloned by limiting dilution, and tested for production of cGAMP in cell lysates four hours after transfection of calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA). (B) Lysates from H1 control and cGAS KO clonal HeLa cells were separated into cytosol (C) and nuclear pellet (NP), and then blotted for endogenous cGAS. (C) H1 control and cGAS KO HeLa cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, and stained for endogenous cGAS. (D) cGAS KO HeLa cells were transduced with pSLIK lentivirus encoding doxycyline-inducible GFP-mouse cGAS (mcGAS), and then treated with doxycyline to induce GFP-mcGAS expression. Cells were then stained with DRAQ5 and visualized with an imaging flow cytometer (Amnis ImageStream). Representative images shown in (D). (E) Analysis of ImageStream data for thousands of individual cells showing percent nuclear and cytosolic localization of GFP-mcGAS.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2. cGAS is tightly tethered in the nucleus. (A) Mouse and human cell lines were separated into cytosolic and nuclear fractions, followed by sequential stepwise elutions of nuclear pellets with the indicated concentrations of NaCl. cGAS and the indicated control proteins (shown for HeLa cells) were monitored throughout the elution by western blot. (B) Densitometry measurements quantitating the relative amounts of endogenous cGAS protein in the cytosol, the 0 salt nuclear lysis, and the cumulative nuclear pellet.
Figure 2. cGAS is tightly tethered in the nucleus. (A) Mouse and human cell lines were separated into cytosolic and nuclear fractions, followed by sequential stepwise elutions of nuclear pellets with the indicated concentrations of NaCl. cGAS and the indicated control proteins (shown for HeLa cells) were monitored throughout the elution by western blot. (B) Densitometry measurements quantitating the relative amounts of endogenous cGAS protein in the cytosol, the 0 salt nuclear lysis, and the cumulative nuclear pellet.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3. cGAS nuclear localization is independent of cell cycle phase or activation status. (A) HeLa cells were arrested at the G1/S border using double thymidine (DT) block, followed by release and harvest at the indicated time points for measurement of DNA content. (B) Cells from (A) were fractionated and cGAS localization was determined by western blot. (C) HeLa cells were transfected with Lipofectamine alone (Lipo) or with CT-DNA for 4 hr, followed by extraction, salt elution, and western blot for endogenous cGAS.
Figure 3. cGAS nuclear localization is independent of cell cycle phase or activation status. (A) HeLa cells were arrested at the G1/S border using double thymidine (DT) block, followed by release and harvest at the indicated time points for measurement of DNA content. (B) Cells from (A) were fractionated and cGAS localization was determined by western blot. (C) HeLa cells were transfected with Lipofectamine alone (Lipo) or with CT-DNA for 4 hr, followed by extraction, salt elution, and western blot for endogenous cGAS.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4. cGAS nuclear localization and tethering are independent of robust DNA binding, dimerization, condensation, and catalytic activity. (A) Structure of human cGAS with domains colorized. (B) TERT-immortalized human foreskin fibroblasts were reconstituted with the indicated Dox-inducible GFP-cGAS lentivirus constructs, treated with 0.1 μg/ml Dox for 24 hr, and then separated into cytosolic (Cyt), nuclear supernatant (NS), and nuclear pellet (NP) fractions. FL: Full-Length. (C) cGAS-deficient HeLa cells reconstituted with the indicated GFP-cGAS constructs were induced for 24 hr with three doses of Dox. Whole cell lysates that recover all cGAS were prepared and blotted with anti-GFP antibody. (D) Cells from (C) were transfected with CT-DNA for four hours, followed by cGAMP measurement in lysates by modified ELISA. (E) Cells described in C-D were treated with 0.1 μg/ml Dox for 24 hr to induce GFP-cGAS expression, then harvested and used for sequential fractionation and salt elution as in Figure 2. (F) Dox-inducible, full-length mouse cGAS constructs were introduced into hTERT-immortalized human fibroblasts. Cells were treated with 0.1 μg/ml Dox for 24 hr followed by stimulation for 4 hr and measurement of cGAMP in cell lysates. (G) Unstimulated cells from (F) were fractionated and blotted for cGAS.
Figure 4. cGAS nuclear localization and tethering are independent of robust DNA binding, dimerization, condensation, and catalytic activity. (A) Structure of human cGAS with domains colorized. (B) TERT-immortalized human foreskin fibroblasts were reconstituted with the indicated Dox-inducible GFP-cGAS lentivirus constructs, treated with 0.1 μg/ml Dox for 24 hr, and then separated into cytosolic (Cyt), nuclear supernatant (NS), and nuclear pellet (NP) fractions. FL: Full-Length. (C) cGAS-deficient HeLa cells reconstituted with the indicated GFP-cGAS constructs were induced for 24 hr with three doses of Dox. Whole cell lysates that recover all cGAS were prepared and blotted with anti-GFP antibody. (D) Cells from (C) were transfected with CT-DNA for four hours, followed by cGAMP measurement in lysates by modified ELISA. (E) Cells described in C-D were treated with 0.1 μg/ml Dox for 24 hr to induce GFP-cGAS expression, then harvested and used for sequential fractionation and salt elution as in Figure 2. (F) Dox-inducible, full-length mouse cGAS constructs were introduced into hTERT-immortalized human fibroblasts. Cells were treated with 0.1 μg/ml Dox for 24 hr followed by stimulation for 4 hr and measurement of cGAMP in cell lysates. (G) Unstimulated cells from (F) were fractionated and blotted for cGAS.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4—figure supplement 1. NONO and IFI16 are dispensable for cGAS nuclear localization and tethering. (A) H1-targeted control HeLa clone and four independent NONO KO HeLa clones were lysed and separated into Cytosol (Cyt), Nuclear supe (NS), and nuclear pellet (NP) fractions, and blotted for NONO and endogenous cGAS. The asterisk indicates a non-specific band detected by the NONO antibody. (B) Cells from (A) were transfected with CT-DNA for four hours, followed by cGAMP measurement in lysates by modified ELISA. (C) TERT-immortalized human fibroblasts were transduced with lentiCRISPR constructs encoding either control gRNA or gRNA targeting IFI16, selected with puromycin to enrich for transduced cells, and then fractionated and blotted with the indicated antibodies.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1. NONO and IFI16 are dispensable for cGAS nuclear localization and tethering. (A) H1-targeted control HeLa clone and four independent NONO KO HeLa clones were lysed and separated into Cytosol (Cyt), Nuclear supe (NS), and nuclear pellet (NP) fractions, and blotted for NONO and endogenous cGAS. The asterisk indicates a non-specific band detected by the NONO antibody. (B) Cells from (A) were transfected with CT-DNA for four hours, followed by cGAMP measurement in lysates by modified ELISA. (C) TERT-immortalized human fibroblasts were transduced with lentiCRISPR constructs encoding either control gRNA or gRNA targeting IFI16, selected with puromycin to enrich for transduced cells, and then fractionated and blotted with the indicated antibodies.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5. Intact chromatin is required for cGAS tethering. (A) THP-1 or HeLa cell nuclear extracts were left untreated (NoTx), treated after the 0 salt wash step with micrococcal nuclease (MN), or treated with at the 0.25 M NaCl elution step with Salt Active Nuclease (SAN). Supernatants (supe) and pellets were collected, and the untreated pellet was sonicated to shear large genomic DNA. DNA was extracted, run on an agarose gel, and visualized with SYBR Safe. (B) Extracts treated as described above were used for sequential salt elution, followed by blotting for Histone H2B or cGAS.
Figure 5. Intact chromatin is required for cGAS tethering. (A) THP-1 or HeLa cell nuclear extracts were left untreated (NoTx), treated after the 0 salt wash step with micrococcal nuclease (MN), or treated with at the 0.25 M NaCl elution step with Salt Active Nuclease (SAN). Supernatants (supe) and pellets were collected, and the untreated pellet was sonicated to shear large genomic DNA. DNA was extracted, run on an agarose gel, and visualized with SYBR Safe. (B) Extracts treated as described above were used for sequential salt elution, followed by blotting for Histone H2B or cGAS.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6. The cGAS tethering surface prevents autoreactivity. (A) cGAS KO HeLa cells were reconstituted with the indicated Dox-inducible murine cGAS lentivirus constructs, treated with 0.1 μg /ml Dox for 24 hr, then transfected for four hours with lipofectamine alone or lipofectamine + CT DNA, followed by measurement of cGAMP in cell lysates. (B) Salt elution profiles of WT and R222E mouse cGAS; the top two panels are in HeLa cells and the bottom panel is in TERT-immortalized human fibroblasts. (C) Crystal structures of mouse cGAS (green) assembled on DNA, modeled from PDBID 5N6I. DNA is orange, R222 is highlighted in purple spheres, and the locations of the active sites are noted with red asterisks. (D) Overlay of mouse cGAS (green) and human OASL (cyan; PDBID 4XQ7). The unique loop in cGAS is colored yellow and indicated with the red arrow. (E) Alignments of cGAS across vertebrate phylogeny, with conserved, positively charged residues highlighted in red and the central loop amino acids indicated by the yellow bar. (F) The positively charged residues near R222 are highlighted in purple spheres. (G) Salt elution profiles of cGAS KO HeLa cells transduced with the indicated murine cGAS constructs after induction with 0.1 μg/ml Dox for 24 hr. (H) Cells from (G) were treated with 0.1 μg/ml Dox for 24 hr, then transfected for four hours with lipofectamine alone or lipofectamine + CT-DNA, followed by measurement of cGAMP in cell lysates. (I) Salt elution profiles of cGAS KO HeLa cells transduced with the indicated human cGAS constructs after induction with 0.1 μg/ml Dox for 24 hr. (J) Cells from (I) were treated as in (H), followed by measurement of cGAMP in cell lysates. Statistical comparisons were made between resting WT cGAS and each mutant, using one-way ANOVA of log-transformed biological replicates. *p=0.0155; **p=0.0018; ***p<0.0001; ns: not significant.
Figure 6. The cGAS tethering surface prevents autoreactivity. (A) cGAS KO HeLa cells were reconstituted with the indicated Dox-inducible murine cGAS lentivirus constructs, treated with 0.1 μg /ml Dox for 24 hr, then transfected for four hours with lipofectamine alone or lipofectamine + CT DNA, followed by measurement of cGAMP in cell lysates. (B) Salt elution profiles of WT and R222E mouse cGAS; the top two panels are in HeLa cells and the bottom panel is in TERT-immortalized human fibroblasts. (C) Crystal structures of mouse cGAS (green) assembled on DNA, modeled from PDBID 5N6I. DNA is orange, R222 is highlighted in purple spheres, and the locations of the active sites are noted with red asterisks. (D) Overlay of mouse cGAS (green) and human OASL (cyan; PDBID 4XQ7). The unique loop in cGAS is colored yellow and indicated with the red arrow. (E) Alignments of cGAS across vertebrate phylogeny, with conserved, positively charged residues highlighted in red and the central loop amino acids indicated by the yellow bar. (F) The positively charged residues near R222 are highlighted in purple spheres. (G) Salt elution profiles of cGAS KO HeLa cells transduced with the indicated murine cGAS constructs after induction with 0.1 μg/ml Dox for 24 hr. (H) Cells from (G) were treated with 0.1 μg/ml Dox for 24 hr, then transfected for four hours with lipofectamine alone or lipofectamine + CT-DNA, followed by measurement of cGAMP in cell lysates. (I) Salt elution profiles of cGAS KO HeLa cells transduced with the indicated human cGAS constructs after induction with 0.1 μg/ml Dox for 24 hr. (J) Cells from (I) were treated as in (H), followed by measurement of cGAMP in cell lysates. Statistical comparisons were made between resting WT cGAS and each mutant, using one-way ANOVA of log-transformed biological replicates. *p=0.0155; **p=0.0018; ***p<0.0001; ns: not significant.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–303 of 303

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Volkman, H. E., Cambier, S., Gray, E. E., & Stetson, D. B.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Stetson, Daniel B
ORCID
Venue
eLife
Publisher
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Published
2019-12-06
Volume
8
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.7554/elife.47491
PMC
PMC6927687
OpenAlex
W2994585472
Cited by
303
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 36
FWCI
13.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (AI084914)
  • Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund (1013540)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (55108572)
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1156262)
  • Cancer Research Institute (A84161)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
cGAS, innate immunity, double-stranded DNA sensing, self-DNA, autoreactivity, chromatin, cytosolic DNA sensing, constitutive activation, nucleic acid sensors
MeSH terms
Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate Synthase, Animals, Cell Nucleus, Cells, Cultured, Cytosol, DNA, DNA Damage, HeLa Cells, Humans, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nuclear Proteins, Nucleotidyltransferases, Protein Binding, Cell Line, Tumor, DNA Cleavage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review