Cited by 18DNA Repair MechanismsRNA regulation and diseaseGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Senataxin and RNase H2 act redundantly to suppress genome instability during class switch recombination

Open access
Zhao, Hongchang, Hartono, Stella R, de Vera, Kirtney Mae Flores, Yu, Zheyuan, Satchi, Krishni, Zhao, Tracy, Sciammas, Roger, Sanz, Lionel, Chédin, Frédéric, Barlow, Jacqueline·2022·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Class switch recombination generates distinct antibody isotypes critical to a robust adaptive immune system, and defects are associated with autoimmune disorders and lymphomagenesis. Transcription is required during class switch recombination to recruit the cytidine deaminase AID—an essential step for the formation of DNA double-strand breaks—and strongly induces the formation of R loops within the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus. However, the impact of R loops on double-strand break formation and repair during class switch recombination remains unclear. Here, we report that cells lacking two enzymes involved in R loop removal—senataxin and RNase H2—exhibit increased R loop formation and genome instability at the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus without impacting its transcriptional activity, AID recruitment, or class switch recombination efficiency. Senataxin and RNase H2-deficient cells also exhibit increased insertion mutations at switch junctions, a hallmark of alternative end joining. Importantly, these phenotypes were not observed in cells lacking senataxin or RNase H2B alone. We propose that senataxin acts redundantly with RNase H2 to mediate timely R loop removal, promoting efficient repair while suppressing AID-dependent genome instability and insertional mutagenesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.78917

Cites

123 of 124 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RNAse H2 acts redundantly with the RNA-DNA helicase Senataxin, which recruits the RNA exosome to the genome through a direct interaction with EXOSC9.

    “Interestingly, RNAse H2 has been shown to act redundantly with the RNA-DNA helicase Senataxin, which recruits the RNA exosome to the genome through a direct interaction with EXOSC9105,106.”

    From EXOSC3 G191 Variants Trigger System-Wide Recalibration of RNA Processing Machinery (2026) · cites this paper as [105]

    The Introduction and Discussion report that SETX and RNase H2 cooperate to remove switch-region R loops in B cells, supporting the redundancy claim in that setting. The Discussion mentions the RNA exosome as another factor that can remove these structures, but our copy does not say that senataxin recruits it to the genome or interacts directly with EXOSC9 (no page numbers are provided). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, H., Hartono, S. R., de Vera, K. M. F., Yu, Z., Satchi, K., Zhao, T., Sciammas, R., Sanz, L., Chédin, F., & Barlow, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis
  • Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis
Corresponding author
Barlow, Jacqueline
Venue
eLife
Published
2022-12-21
Volume
11
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312018170
Cited by
18
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (CA188106)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM134537, GM139549)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI151610)
  • University of California Cancer Research Coordinating Committee (Seed Grant CRR-20-635379)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
SETX, RNase H2, class switch recombination, genomic instability, R-loops, immunoglobulin heavy chain locus, AID, alternative end-joining, DNA double-strand break repair, antibody isotype switching, lymphomagenesis
MeSH terms
Cytidine Deaminase, Endoribonucleases, Humans, Immunoglobulin Isotypes, Recombination, Genetic, Ribonucleases, Immunoglobulin Class Switching, Genomic Instability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review