PreprintCited by 2Machine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sensitive remote homology search by local alignment of small positional embeddings from protein language models

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.7554/elife.91415.3

Abstract

Abstract Accurately detecting distant evolutionary relationships between proteins remains an ongoing challenge in bioinformatics. Search methods based on primary sequence struggle to accurately detect homology between sequences with less than 20% amino acid identity. Profile- and structure-based strategies extend sensitive search capabilities into this twilight zone of sequence similarity but require slow pre-processing steps. Recently, whole-protein and positional embeddings from deep neural networks have shown promise for providing sensitive sequence comparison and annotation at long evolutionary distances. Embeddings are generally faster to compute than profiles and predicted structures but still suffer several drawbacks related to the ability of whole-protein embeddings to discriminate domain-level homology, and the database size and search speed of methods using positional embeddings. In this work, we show that low-dimensionality positional embeddings can be used directly in speed-optimized local search algorithms. As a proof of concept, we use the ESM2 3B model to convert primary sequences directly into the 3Di alphabet or amino acid profiles and use these embeddings as input to the highly optimized Foldseek, HMMER3, and HH-suite search algorithms. Our results suggest that positional embeddings as small as a single byte can provide sufficient information for dramatically improved sensitivity over amino acid sequence searches without sacrificing search speed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.91415.2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 1997, Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs, Nucleic Acids Research, 25, 3389, 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2019, RUPEE: A fast and accurate purely geometric protein structure search, PLOS ONE, 14, e0213712, 10.1371/journal.pone.0213712 · DOI
  3. 2000, The Protein Data Bank, Nucleic Acids Research, 28, 235, 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2021, Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND, Nat Methods, 18, 366, 10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 2009, BLAST+: architecture and applications, BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 421, 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 2019, SCOPe: classification of large macromolecular structures in the structural classification of proteins—extended database, Nucleic Acids Research, 47, D475, 10.1093/nar/gky1134 · DOI
  7. 2019, BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
  8. 2011, Accelerated Profile HMM Searches, PLOS Computational Biology, 7, e1002195, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2021, ProtTrans: Towards Cracking the Language of Lifes Code Through Self-Supervised Deep Learning and High Performance Computing, 1, 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3095381 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 2022. ProtNLM: Model-based Natural Language Protein Annotation. https://www.uniprot.org/help/ProtNLM.
  11. 2022, TM-Vec: template modeling vectors for fast homology detection and alignment, 10.1101/2022.07.25.501437 · DOI
  12. 2023, ProstT5: Bilingual Language Model for Protein Sequence and Structure, 10.1101/2023.07.23.550085 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 1992, Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 89, 10915, 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10915 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 2022, Dali server: structural unification of protein families, 10.1093/nar/gkac387 · DOI
  15. 2023, How AlphaFold shaped the structural coverage of the human transmembrane proteome, 10.1101/2023.04.18.537193 · DOI
  16. 2010, Hidden Markov model speed heuristic and iterative HMM search procedure, BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 431, 10.1186/1471-2105-11-431 · DOI
  17. 2023, pLM-BLAST: distant homology detection based on direct comparison of sequence representations from protein language models, Bioinformatics, 39, btad579, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad579 · DOI
  18. 2013, MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30, 772, 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 2009, Protein function annotation by homology-based inference, Genome Biology, 10, 207, 10.1186/gb-2009-10-2-207 · DOI
  20. 2022, ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all, Nat Methods, 19, 679, 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2021, Pfam: The protein families database in 2021, Nucleic Acids Research, 49, D412, 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 2022, Embedding-based alignment: combining protein language models and alignment approaches to detect structural similarities in the twilight-zone, 10.1101/2022.12.13.520313 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 2019, PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library, 10.48550/arXiv.1912.01703 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 2023, End-to-end learning of multiple sequence alignments with differentiable Smith–Waterman, Bioinformatics, 39, btac724, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac724 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 2023, MGnify: the microbiome sequence data analysis resource in 2023, Nucleic Acids Research, 51, D753, 10.1093/nar/gkac1080 · DOI
  26. 1999, Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments, Protein Engineering, Design and Selection, 12, 85, 10.1093/protein/12.2.85 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 2023, ProteInfer, deep neural networks for protein functional inference, eLife, 12, e80942, 10.7554/eLife.80942 · DOI
  28. 2022, Nearest neighbor search on embeddings rapidly identifies distant protein relations, Frontiers in Bioinformatics, 2
  29. 2019, HH-suite3 for fast remote homology detection and deep protein annotation, BMC Bioinformatics, 20, 473, 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 2017, MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets, Nat Biotechnol, 35, 1026, 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 2023, Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek, 1, 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 2022, AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models, Nucleic Acids Research, 50, D439, 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 2014, Skylign: a tool for creating informative, interactive logos representing sequence alignments and profile hidden Markov models, BMC Bioinformatics, 15, 7, 10.1186/1471-2105-15-7 · DOI
  34. 2023, Protein Embedding based Alignment (preprint). Preprints, 10.22541/au.168534397.72964200/v1 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, S. R., Peshwa, M., & Sun, Z.
Affiliations
New England Biolabs (United States) (US)
Venue
eLife
Published
2024-02-26
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392154586
Cited by
2
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
eLife (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
New England Biolabs
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
remote homology detection, positional encoding, protein language models, ESM-2, local alignment, sequence similarity search, amino acid composition, Foldseek, low-dimensional embedding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review