Cited by 8Protein Structure and DynamicsMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Researchvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Accurate prediction of CDR-H3 loop structures of antibodies with deep learning

Open access
Chen, Hedi, Fan, Xiaoyu, Zhu, Shuqian, Pei, Yuchan, Zhang, Xiaochun, Zhang, Xiaonan, Liu, Lihang, Qian, Feng +1 more·2024·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Accurate prediction of the structurally diverse complementarity determining region heavy chain 3 (CDR-H3) loop structure remains a primary and long-standing challenge for antibody modeling. Here, we present the H3-OPT toolkit for predicting the 3D structures of monoclonal antibodies and nanobodies. H3-OPT combines the strengths of AlphaFold2 with a pre-trained protein language model and provides a 2.24 Å average RMSD Cα between predicted and experimentally determined CDR-H3 loops, thus outperforming other current computational methods in our non-redundant high-quality dataset. The model was validated by experimentally solving three structures of anti-VEGF nanobodies predicted by H3-OPT. We examined the potential applications of H3-OPT through analyzing antibody surface properties and antibody–antigen interactions. This structural prediction tool can be used to optimize antibody–antigen binding and engineer therapeutic antibodies with biophysical properties for specialized drug administration route.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.91512

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Chen, H., Fan, X., Zhu, S., Pei, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Liu, L., Qian, F., & Tian, B.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Qian, Feng
  • Tian, Boxue
Venue
eLife
Published
2024-06-26
Volume
12
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387745032
Cited by
8
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Tsinghua University (Initiative Scientific Research Program 20231080030)
  • Vanke Special Fund for Public Health and Health Discipline Development (2022Z82WKJ009)
  • Tsinghua-Peking University Center for Life Sciences (20111770319)
  • Tsinghua University-Peking Union Medical College and Hospital Collaboration Foundation (20191080837)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
monoclonal antibodies, nanobodies, AlphaFold2, protein language models, antigen-antibody reaction
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Complementarity Determining Regions, Single-Domain Antibodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review