Cited by 7Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingBiochemical effects in animals

Effects of Five Weeks of Resistance Training and Relatively-Dosed Creatine Monohydrate Supplementation on Body Composition and Muscle Strength, and Whole-Body Creatine Metabolism in Resistance-Trained Males

Open access
Thomas André, Joshua J. Gann, Sarah K. McKinley-Barnard, Darryn S. Willoughby·2016·International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science

Abstract

Background: Creatine (Cr) supplementation has been established as an ergogenic aid in most individuals during anaerobic exercise. However, discrepancies exist in the data when using absolute dosing. Objective: The effects of five weeks of resistance training with relatively-dosed Cr followed by four weeks of resistance training after ceasing supplementation were determined. Methods: Resistance-trained men, 19 (CR = 9, PL = 10), ingested Cr or placebo for five weeks with resistance training. Participants ingested 0.3 g/kg lean body mass/day for one week, 0.075 g/kg lean body mass/day for four weeks, with a four-week wash out. Five muscle samples, six blood samples, and nine urine samples were collected. Separate two-way ANOVAs for each criterion variable were used employing an alpha level of ≤ 0.05. Results: A group x time interaction for increased total body mass for CR Day 1 and 64 (p = 0.03) and total lean mass for CR Day 1 and 64 (p = 0.01). Group x time interactions occurred for Cr supplementation increasing serum Cr at Day 4, 8, and 22 (p = 0.03), urinary Cr at Day 4 (p = 0.01), and total muscle Cr at Day 8 (p < 0.001), 22 (p = 0.003), and 36 (p < 0.001). No significant differences occurred for serum (p = 0.14) or urine (p = 0.15) creatinine. Conclusion: Elevated levels of urinary Cr demonstrate dosing could be reduced. Keywords: Urine, creatinine, resistance training, muscle strength, serum

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.4n.2p.27

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Resistance-trained males who received creatine at 0.3 g/kg lean body mass/day for 7 days followed by 4 weeks at 0.075 g/kg lean body mass/day experienced no significant change in intracellular water, extracellular water, or total body water.

    “For example, resistance-trained males who received creatine at a dose of 0.3 g/kg lean body mass/day for 7 days (approximately 20 g/day) followed by 4 weeks at 0.075 g/kg lean body mass/day for 28 days (approximately 5 g/day) experienced no significant change in ICW, ECW, or TBW [40].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
André, T., Gann, J. J., McKinley-Barnard, S. K., & Willoughby, D. S.
Venue
International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science
Published
2016-05-15
Volume
4
Issue
2
ISSN
2202-946X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2337935707
Cited by
7
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biochemical effects in animals
Keywords
creatine monohydrate supplementation, resistance training, body composition, lean body mass, muscle strength, urinary creatine, serum creatine, resistance-trained men

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review