Cited by 115Muscle metabolism and nutritionBiochemical effects in animalsExercise and Physiological Responses

Dietary creatine supplementation does not affect some haematological indices, or indices of muscle damage and hepatic and renal function

Open access
Robinson, Tristan M, Sewell, Dean A, Casey, Anna, Steenge, Gery, Greenhaff, Paul L·2000·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background—The use of creatine (Cr) as a nutritional supplement to aid athletic performance has gained widespread popularity among athletes. However, concerns have recently been expressed over potentially harmful effects of short and long term Cr supplementation on health. Methods—Forty eight young healthy subjects were randomly allocated to three experimental protocols aimed at elucidating any potential health risks associated with five days (20 g/day) to nine weeks (3 g/day) of Cr supplementation. Venous blood samples were collected before and after periods of Cr supplementation and were analysed for some haematological indices, and for indices of hepatic, muscular, and renal dysfunction. Findings—All measured indices were well within their respective normal range at all times. Serum creatinine concentration tended to be increased the day after Cr supplementation. However, values had returned to baseline six weeks after the cessation of supplementation. These increases were probably attributable to increased creatinine production rather than renal dysfunction. No indication of impairment to the haematological indices measured, hepatic function, or muscle damage was apparent after Cr supplementation. Interpretation—These data provide evidence that there are no obvious adverse effects of acute or more chronic Cr supplementation on the haematological indices measured, nor on hepatic, muscle, and renal function. Therefore there is no apparent health risk associated with Cr supplementation to healthy people when it is ingested in quantities that have been scientifically proven to increase muscle Cr stores.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsm.34.4.284

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature has not provided support that creatine promotes renal dysfunction.

    “Nor has the literature provided any support that creatine promotes renal dysfunction [22, 51, 85, 114, 156, 172, 243–248]”

    From International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine (2017) · cites this paper as [244]

    The paper's introductory passage says that concerns about creatine and renal dysfunction lacked scientific evidence, and its Additional information section reports no adverse effects on the renal indices it measured. But the introduction expressly excepts two published case reports of renal dysfunction accompanying supplementation, so the claim that the literature provided no support at all is too absolute. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Performance-related studies in adolescents, younger individuals, and older populations have consistently reported ergogenic benefits with no clinically significant side effects.

    “Performance-related studies in adolescents, younger individuals, and older populations have consistently reported ergogenic benefits with no clinically significant side effects [5, 6, 22, 23, 53, 113, 129, 244, 245, 268].”

    From International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine (2017) · cites this paper as [244]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports no clinically significant changes in the measured health indices after creatine supplementation in young healthy adults. The paper also cites earlier studies reporting performance benefits, but it did not measure performance or study adolescents or older adults. It therefore supports the safety finding for its participants, not the full claim across age groups. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • No significant changes in GFR were observed, suggesting preserved kidney function.

    “No significant changes were observed in GFR, suggesting preserved kidney function.”

    From Effect of creatine supplementation on kidney function: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Sampling Protocol lists serum sodium, potassium, urea, and creatinine as the renal-function measures; it does not list GFR. The Discussion concludes that there were no clinically significant changes in the renal-function indices measured, supporting the general kidney-function inference but not the specific claim that GFR showed no significant change. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Gordon A, Hultman E, Kaijser L, et al. Creatine supplementation in chronic heart failure increases skeletal muscle creatine phosphate and muscle performance. Cardiovasc Res 1995;30:413-18.
  2. Balsom PD, Ekblom B, Soderlund K, et al. Creatine supple- mentation and dynamic high-intensity intermittent exer- cise. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1993;3:143-9.
  3. Earnest CP, Snell PG, Rodriguez R, et al. The eVect of crea- tine monohydrate ingestion on anaerobic power indices, muscular strength and body composition. Acta Physiol Scand 1995;153:207-9.
  4. Casey A, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Howell S, et al. Creatine ingestion favourably aVects performance and muscle metabolism during maximal exercise in humans. Am J Physiol 1996;271:E31-7.
  5. Hultman E, Soderlund K, Timmons J, et al. Muscle creatine loading in men. J Appl Physiol 1996;81:232-7.
  6. Green AL, Simpson EJ, Littlewood JJ, et al. Carbohydrate ingestion augments creatine retention during creatine feed- ing in humans. Acta Physiol Scand 1996;158:195-202.
  7. Walker, J.B. Creatine: biosynthesis, regulation, and function. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 1979;50:177-242.
  8. Anon. Is creatine safe? Sports Medicine Digest 1998;20:93-5.
  9. Koshy KM, Griswold E, Schneeberger EE. Interstitial nephritis in a patient taking creatine. N Engl J Med 1999;340:814-15.
  10. Green AL, Hultman E, Macdonald IA, et al. Carbohydrate ingestion augments skeletal muscle creatine accumulation during creatine supplementation in humans. Am J Physiol 1996;271:E821-6.
  11. The MEDICINE Publishing Foundation. Normal values in medicine. Oxford: The Foundation, 1983.
  12. Earnest C, Almada A, Mitchell T. Influence of chronic crea- tine supplementation on hepatorenal function. FASEB J 1996;10:4566.
  13. Almada A, Mitchell T, Earnest C. Impact of chronic creat- ine supplementation on serum enzyme concentrations. FASEB J 1996;10:4567.
  14. Poortmans J, Auquier H, Renaut V, et al. EVect of short-term creatine supplementation on renal responses in men. Eur J Appl Physiol 1997;76:566-7.
  15. Fitch CD, Sinton DW. A study of creatine metabolism in diseases causing muscle wasting. J Clin Invest 1964;43:444- 52.
  16. Fitch CD, Shields RP, Payne WF, et al. Creatine metabolism in skeletal muscle. III. Specificity of the creatine entry process. J Biol Chem 1968;243:2024-7.
  17. Heymsfield SB, Arteaga C, McManus C, et al. Measure- ment of muscle mass in humans: validity of the 24-hour urinary creatinine method. Am J Clin Nutr 1900;37:478- 94.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson, T. M., Sewell, D. A., Casey, A., Steenge, G., & Greenhaff, P. L.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Greenhaff, Paul L
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2000-08
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
284-288
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2156734439
Cited by
115
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biochemical effects in animals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
creatine supplementation, dietary creatine, hematological parameters, muscle damage, liver function, renal function, serum creatinine, creatine kinase, health risks of supplements, athletes
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood, Blood Chemical Analysis, Creatine, Female, Humans, Kidney, Liver, Male, Muscle, Skeletal, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review