Cited by 25Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

OES-Fed: a federated learning framework in vehicular network based on noise data filtering

Open access
Lei, Yuan, Wang, Shir Li, Su, Caiyu, Ng, Theam Foo·2022·PeerJ Computer Science

Abstract

The Internet of Vehicles (IoV) is an interactive network providing intelligent traffic management, intelligent dynamic information service, and intelligent vehicle control to running vehicles. One of the main problems in the IoV is the reluctance of vehicles to share local data resulting in the cloud server not being able to acquire a sufficient amount of data to build accurate machine learning (ML) models. In addition, communication efficiency and ML model accuracy in the IoV are affected by noise data caused by violent shaking and obscuration of in-vehicle cameras. Therefore we propose a new Outlier Detection and Exponential Smoothing federated learning (OES-Fed) framework to overcome these problems. More specifically, we filter the noise data of the local ML model in the IoV from the current perspective and historical perspective. The noise data filtering is implemented by combining data outlier, K-means, Kalman filter and exponential smoothing algorithms. The experimental results of the three datasets show that the OES-Fed framework proposed in this article achieved higher accuracy, lower loss, and better area under the curve (AUC). The OES-Fed framework we propose can better filter noise data, providing an important domain reference for starting field of federated learning in the IoV.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7717/peerj-cs.1101

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 IoV scenario.
Figure 1 IoV scenario.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 System model.
Figure 2 System model.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 OES-Fed framework.
Figure 3 OES-Fed framework.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Statistics on the number of actual clients in the OES-Fed model using the MNIST dataset, the CIFAR-10 dataset and the vehicle classification dataset.
Figure 4 Statistics on the number of actual clients in the OES-Fed model using the MNIST dataset, the CIFAR-10 dataset and the vehicle classification dataset.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Comparison of the accuracy of each model for MNIST, CIFAR-10 and the vehicle classification datasets using different models and non-iid data settings.
Figure 5 Comparison of the accuracy of each model for MNIST, CIFAR-10 and the vehicle classification datasets using different models and non-iid data settings.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Comparison of loss values for each model for MNIST, CIFAR-10 and the vehicle classification datasets using different models and non-iid data settings.
Figure 6 Comparison of loss values for each model for MNIST, CIFAR-10 and the vehicle classification datasets using different models and non-iid data settings.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Comparison of AUC values for each model for MNIST using different models and non-iid data settings.
Figure 7 Comparison of AUC values for each model for MNIST using different models and non-iid data settings.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 8 Comparison of AUC values for each model for CIFAR-10 using different models and non-iid data settings.
Figure 8 Comparison of AUC values for each model for CIFAR-10 using different models and non-iid data settings.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 9 Comparison of AUC values for each model for the vehicle classification dataset using different models and non-iid data settings.
Figure 9 Comparison of AUC values for each model for the vehicle classification dataset using different models and non-iid data settings.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 10 Accuracy comparison of all clients in the last round for the MNIST dataset, CIFAR-10 dataset and the vehicle classification dataset using the OES-Fed model and FedAVG model.
Figure 10 Accuracy comparison of all clients in the last round for the MNIST dataset, CIFAR-10 dataset and the vehicle classification dataset using the OES-Fed model and FedAVG model.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Ahmed, 2020, Active learning based federated learning for waste and natural disaster image classification, IEEE Access, 8, 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3038676 · DOI
  2. Bao, 2021, Edge computing-based joint client selection and networking scheme for federated learning in vehicular IoT, China Communications, 18, 39, 10.23919/JCC.2021.06.004 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Baumer, 2018, Lessons from between the white lines for isolated data scientists, The American Statistician, 72, 66, 10.1080/00031305.2017.1375985 · DOI
  4. Burlet, 2017, Isolated guitar transcription using a deep belief network, PeerJ Computer Science, 3, e109, 10.7717/peerj-cs.109 · DOI
  5. Chithaluru, 2021a, Energy-efficient blockchain implementation for cognitive wireless communication networks (CWCNs), Energy Reports, 7, 8277, 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.136 · DOI
  6. Chithaluru, 2021b, An energy-efficient routing scheduling based on fuzzy ranking scheme for internet of things, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9, 7251, 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3098430 · DOI
  7. Chithaluru, 2021, ARIOR: adaptive ranking based improved opportunistic routing in wireless sensor networks, Wireless Personal Communications, 116, 153, 10.1007/s11277-020-07709-0 · DOI
  8. Ghane, 2020, Preserving privacy in the internet of connected vehicles, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22, 5018, 10.1109/TITS.2020.2964410 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Goh, 2020, Outlier percentage estimation for shape‐ and parameter‐independent outlier detection, IET Image Processing, 14, 3414, 10.1049/iet-ipr.2020.0334 · DOI
  10. Goudarzi, 2021, An efficient filter with low memory usage for multimedia data of industrial internet of things, PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e589, 10.7717/peerj-cs.589 · DOI
  11. Gunagwera, 2022, A longitudinal inter-vehicle distance controller application for autonomous vehicle platoons, PeerJ Computer Science, 8, e990, 10.7717/peerj-cs.990 · DOI
  12. Husnoo, 2021, Do not get fooled: defense against the one-pixel attack to protect IoT-enabled deep learning systems, Ad Hoc Networks, 122, 102627, 10.1016/j.adhoc.2021.102627 · DOI
  13. Lakhan, 2021, Federated learning enables intelligent reflecting surface in fog-cloud enabled cellular network, PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e758, 10.7717/peerj-cs.758 · DOI
  14. Manias, 2021, Making a case for federated learning in the internet of vehicles and intelligent transportation systems, IEEE Network, 35, 88, 10.1109/MNET.011.2000552 · DOI
  15. Novikova, 2022, Analysis of privacy-enhancing technologies in open-source federated learning frameworks for driver activity recognition, Sensors, 22, 2983, 10.3390/s22082983 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Pokhrel, 2020a, Federated learning with blockchain for autonomous vehicles: analysis and design challenges, IEEE Transactions on Communications, 68, 4734, 10.1109/TCOMM.2020.2990686 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Pokhrel, 2020b, Improving TCP performance over WiFi for internet of vehicles: a federated learning approach, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 69, 6798, 10.1109/TVT.2020.2984369 · DOI
  18. Posner, 2021, Federated learning in vehicular networks: opportunities and solutions, IEEE Network, 35, 152, 10.1109/MNET.011.2000430 · DOI
  19. Poudyal, 2021, Multiarea inertia estimation using convolutional neural networks and federated learning, IEEE Systems Journal, 99, 1, 10.1109/JSYST.2021.3134599 · DOI
  20. Rahajoe, 2019, Forecasting feature selection based on single exponential smoothing using wrapper method, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10, 139, 10.14569/issn.2156-5570 · DOI
  21. Raza, 2021, A vehicle to vehicle relay-based task offloading scheme in vehicular communication networks, PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e486, 10.7717/peerj-cs.486 · DOI
  22. Reunanen, 2020, Automatic optimization of outlier detection ensembles using a limited number of outlier examples, International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 10, 377, 10.1007/s41060-020-00222-4 · DOI
  23. Singh, 2022, Hybrid genetic firefly algorithm-based routing protocol for VANETs, IEEE Access, 10, 9142, 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3142811 · DOI
  24. Tehseen, 2021, A framework for the prediction of earthquake using federated learning, PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e540, 10.7717/peerj-cs.540 · DOI
  25. Toet, 2016, Alternating guided image filtering, PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e72, 10.7717/peerj-cs.72 · DOI
  26. Wang, 2020, Simulation of vehicle network communication security based on random geometry and data mining, IEEE Access, 8, 69389, 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2986338 · DOI
  27. Wang, 2021, Rapid global path planning algorithm for unmanned surface vehicles in large-scale and multi-island marine environments, PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e612, 10.7717/peerj-cs.612 · DOI
  28. Wang, 2020, An intrusion detection method based on federated learning and convolutional neural network, Netinfo Security, 20, 47, 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1122.2020.04.006 · DOI
  29. Xu, 2022, Outlier detection algorithm based on k-nearest neighbors-local outlier factor, Journal of Algorithms & Computational Technology, 16, 17483026221078111, 10.1177/17483026221078111 · DOI
  30. Yang, 2021b, MSTA-Net: forgery detection by generating manipulation trace based on multi-scale self-texture attention, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 32, 4854, 10.1109/TCSVT.2021.3133859 · DOI
  31. Yang, 2022, Differentially private federated learning via reconfigurable intelligent surface, ArXiv preprint, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.17028 · DOI
  32. Ye, 2020, Federated learning in vehicular edge computing: a selective model aggregation approach, IEEE Access, 8, 23920, 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968399 · DOI
  33. Zhang, 2018, The model research on location fusion algorithm with big data selection and accuracy correction, 10.12783/dtcse/wicom2018/26274 · DOI
  34. Zhao, 2020, Local differential privacy-based federated learning for internet of things, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8, 8836, 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3037194 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Lei, Y., Wang, S. L., Su, C., & Ng, T. F.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Art, Computing and Creative Industry, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Sultan Idris Education University (MY)
  • Guangxi Vocational & Technical Institute of Industry (CN)
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Shir Li
  • Su, Caiyu
Venue
PeerJ Computer Science
Publisher
PeerJ
Published
2022-09-20
Volume
8
Pages
e1101
ISSN
2376-5992 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4296391926
Cited by
25
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PeerJ Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • The Higher Education Dept. of the Ministry of Education of P. R. China
  • Industry and University Cooperation Collaborative Education Project (202002118061)
  • Guangxi Colleges in 2022 (2022KY1296)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
federated learning, vehicular networks, Internet of Vehicles, outlier detection, exponential smoothing, Kalman filter, K-means clustering, privacy-preserving machine learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review