Cited by 33Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesUsability and User Interface DesignMobile and Web Applications

Accessibility challenges of e-commerce websites

Open access
Acosta-Vargas, Patricia, Salvador-Acosta, Belén, Salvador-Ullauri, Luis, Jadán-Guerrero, Janio·2022·PeerJ Computer Science

Abstract

Today, there are many e-commerce websites, but not all of them are accessible. Accessibility is a crucial element that can make a difference and determine the success or failure of a digital business. The study was applied to 50 e-commerce sites in the top rankings according to the classification proposed by ecommerceDB. In evaluating the web accessibility of e-commerce sites, we applied an automatic review method based on a modification of Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) 1.0. To evaluate accessibility, we used Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool (WAVE) with the extension for Google Chrome, which helps verify password-protected, locally stored, or highly dynamic pages. The study found that the correlation between the ranking of e-commerce websites and accessibility barriers is 0.329, indicating that the correlation is low positive according to Spearman's Rho. According to the WAVE analysis, the research results reveal that the top 10 most accessible websites are Sainsbury's Supermarkets, Walmart, Target Corporation, Macy's, IKEA, H&M Hennes, Chewy, Kroger, QVC, and Nike. The most significant number of accessibility barriers relate to contrast errors that must be corrected for e-commerce websites to reach an acceptable level of accessibility. The most neglected accessibility principle is perceivable, representing 83.1%, followed by operable with 13.7%, in third place is robust with 1.7% and finally understandable with 1.5%. Future work suggests constructing a software tool that includes artificial intelligence algorithms that help the software identify accessibility barriers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7717/peerj-cs.891

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • E-commerce is a particularly relevant context for teaching digital accessibility, as many design and development students will likely work on web-based platforms such as online shops.

    “E-commerce is a particularly relevant context for teaching digital accessibility, as many design and development students will likely work on web-based platforms such as online shops [2, 7].”

    From Proceedings of the 37th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (2025) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says e-commerce websites have grown considerably and that applying accessibility guidelines to them is essential, supporting their relevance as an accessibility context. The paper does not address teaching digital accessibility or whether design and development students are likely to work on online shops. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Acosta-Vargas, P., Salvador-Acosta, B., Salvador-Ullauri, L., & Jadán-Guerrero, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Las Américas (EC)
  • University of Alicante (ES)
  • Universidad Indoamérica (EC)
Corresponding author
Acosta-Vargas, Patricia
Venue
PeerJ Computer Science
Publisher
PeerJ
Published
2022-02-22
Volume
8
Pages
e891
ISSN
2376-5992 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4212921141
Cited by
32
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
FWCI
15.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PeerJ Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Universidad de Las Américas-Ecuador (INI.PAV.20.01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile and Web Applications
Keywords
web accessibility, e-commerce platforms, WAVE tool, automatic accessibility evaluation, website ranking, access barriers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review