Accessibility challenges of e-commerce websites
Open accessAbstract
Today, there are many e-commerce websites, but not all of them are accessible. Accessibility is a crucial element that can make a difference and determine the success or failure of a digital business. The study was applied to 50 e-commerce sites in the top rankings according to the classification proposed by ecommerceDB. In evaluating the web accessibility of e-commerce sites, we applied an automatic review method based on a modification of Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) 1.0. To evaluate accessibility, we used Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool (WAVE) with the extension for Google Chrome, which helps verify password-protected, locally stored, or highly dynamic pages. The study found that the correlation between the ranking of e-commerce websites and accessibility barriers is 0.329, indicating that the correlation is low positive according to Spearman's Rho. According to the WAVE analysis, the research results reveal that the top 10 most accessible websites are Sainsbury's Supermarkets, Walmart, Target Corporation, Macy's, IKEA, H&M Hennes, Chewy, Kroger, QVC, and Nike. The most significant number of accessibility barriers relate to contrast errors that must be corrected for e-commerce websites to reach an acceptable level of accessibility. The most neglected accessibility principle is perceivable, representing 83.1%, followed by operable with 13.7%, in third place is robust with 1.7% and finally understandable with 1.5%. Future work suggests constructing a software tool that includes artificial intelligence algorithms that help the software identify accessibility barriers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
E-commerce is a particularly relevant context for teaching digital accessibility, as many design and development students will likely work on web-based platforms such as online shops.
“E-commerce is a particularly relevant context for teaching digital accessibility, as many design and development students will likely work on web-based platforms such as online shops [2, 7].”
From Proceedings of the 37th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
The Introduction (page unavailable) says e-commerce websites have grown considerably and that applying accessibility guidelines to them is essential, supporting their relevance as an accessibility context. The paper does not address teaching digital accessibility or whether design and development students are likely to work on online shops. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Blindness and Vision Impairment
Etya’ale, D. (2023) · Sustainable development goals series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33851-9_31 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Mobility Restrictions and E-Commerce: Holistic Balance in Madrid Centre during COVID-19 Lockdown
Villa, R. A. D., & de Cáceres, A. M. (2021) · Economies · doi:10.3390/economies9020057 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Acosta-Vargas, P., Acosta, T., & Lujan-Mora, S. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2848978 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationTools for web accessibility evaluation
Abascal, J., Arrue, M., & Valencia, X. (2019) · Human–Computer Interaction Series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_26 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
A Heuristic Method to Evaluate Web Accessibility for Users With Low Vision
Acosta-Vargas, P., Antonio Salvador-Ullauri, L., & Lujan-Mora, S. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2939068 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationPollák, F., Konečný, M., & Ščeulovs, D. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13147986 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Autofocals: Evaluating gaze-contingent eyeglasses for presbyopes
Padmanaban, N., Konrad, R., & Wetzstein, G. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav6187 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
The Perspective of E-Business Sustainability and Website Accessibility of Online Stores
Paștiu, C. A., Oncioiu, I., Gârdan, D. A., Maican, S., Gârdan, I. P., & Muntean, A. C. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12229780 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Combined Method for Evaluating Accessibility in Serious Games
Salvador-Ullauri, L., Acosta-Vargas, P., González, M., & Luján‐Mora, S. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10186324 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationAccessibility Evaluation of Arabic E-Commerce Web Sites Using Automated Tools
Alshamari, M. (2016) · Journal of Software Engineering and Applications · doi:10.4236/jsea.2016.99029 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Comparing Six Free Accessibility Evaluation Tools
PADURE, M., & PRIBEANU, C. (2020) · Informatica Economica · doi:10.24818/issn14531305/24.1.2020.02 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
The role of automated evaluation techniques in online professional translator training
Munková, D., Munk, M., Benko, Ľ., & Hájek, P. (2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.706 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Comparison of Accessibility Tools for the Evaluation of E-Commerce Websites
Paz, F. A., Paz, F. A., Moquillaza, A., Collantes, L., Arenas, J. J., & Villanueva, D. (2021) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68017-6_130 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Comparing Web Accessibility between Major Retailers and Novelties for E-Commerce
Xu, J. (2020) · Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
(Dataset) Web accessibility of the e-commerce website
Acosta-Vargas, P. (2021) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · doi:10.17632/s33r57h5zm · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationTransformação Digital: dimensões organizacionais e societais
CEOS.PP (2020) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · doi:10.26537/ne7d-vf69 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ruiz-Rojas, L. I., Acosta-Vargas, P., De-Moreta-Llovet, J., & Gonzalez-Rodriguez, M. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151511524 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Self-citationChemnad, K., & Othman, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1349668 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Accessibility Analysis of Worldwide COVID-19-Related Information Portals
Acosta-Vargas, P., Novillo-Villegas, S., Salvador-Acosta, B., Calvopiña, M., Kyriakidis, N. C., Ortiz‐Prado, E., & Salvador-Ullauri, L. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191912102 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationТодоров, Т., & Dochkova-Todorova, J. (2023) · International Conference Automatics and Informatics (ICAI) · doi:10.1109/icai58806.2023.10339066 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Web accessibility of Indian cultural heritage information: an analytical study of museum websites
Pandey, R., & Kumar, V. (2023) · Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development · doi:10.1108/jchmsd-08-2021-0153 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Equity in e-commerce accessibility: Gaps and opportunities for a research agenda
de Sousa, L. T. M., de Oliveira, L. K., & Bracarense, L. D. S. F. P. (2023) · Latin American Transport Studies · doi:10.1016/j.latran.2023.100002 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Arya Asok, A. R., & Rekha, R. V. (2025) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103120 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Ghandour, R. (2024) · Journal of Trade Science · doi:10.1108/jts-03-2024-0018 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Integrating accessibility, usability and UX in web project management: a systematic review
Gómez-Delgado, J., Palacios, C. M., & Martín, L. M. (2026) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-025-01298-0 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Michtner, P., & Pinzolits, R. F. J. (2025) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-025-01219-1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Perceptions of Trust and Purchase Decisions in Tourism E-Commerce Platforms
MOHALE, E. T., ROBERSON, J. R., & SMITH, A. J. (2025) · African Journal of Hospitality Tourism and Leisure · doi:10.46222/ajhtl.19770720.611 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Fichtner, J. R., & Strader, T. J. (2024) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-023-01080-0 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Getting users out of the loop: Key factors to surpass the messy middle point
Nichifor, E., Brătucu, G., Chițu, I. B., Țierean, O. M., Litră, A. V., Zamfirache, A., & Vuță, D. R. (2023) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2023.101264 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Kubullek, A.-K., Zimmer, L., Ly, T. T. M., & Dogangün, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the 37th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3764687.3764711 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Voice Controlled Operations and Navigations for e-Commerce
Kalangutkar, A., Yadav, R., Hadapad, P. S., Naik, V. V., Menezes, V., & Sawant, S. (2023) · International Conference on Networks, Multimedia and Information Technology (NMITCON) · doi:10.1109/nmitcon58196.2023.10276232 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Accessibility of COVID-19-related Public Websites in Japan
Furukawa, E., Okuhara, T., Okada, H., & Kiuchi, T. (2024) · American Journal of Health Education · doi:10.1080/19325037.2024.2338454 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Cudjoe, E. K., & Asilevi, P. A. (2026) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-026-01379-8
A New Approach for Product Quality Check Based on Social Networks Opinions Analysis
Enaanai, E. A. A. (2023) · International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication · doi:10.17762/ijritcc.v11i10.8617
Retraction: The design of E-commerce website’s based on IoT
Kadhim, R. W., Hussien, N. M., Mohialden, Y. M., & Joshi, K. K. (2023) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0181778
RetractedComercio electrónico y marketing digital en empresas de moda en Lima Metropolitana, Perú
Alegre-Osores, P. L. (2024) · INNOVA Research Journal · doi:10.33890/innova.v9.n1.2024.2357
A MultiCriteria Approach in ECommerce Product Ranking
Choudhary, T., Aggarwal, V., Jain, P., & Trivedi, S. (2023) · International Conference on Information Management & Machine Intelligence (ICIMMI) · doi:10.1145/3647444.3647891
Sohail, R., Nazir, S. S., Nazim, A., & Chaudhry, U. (2024) · Pakistan BioMedical Journal · doi:10.54393/pbmj.v7i05.1089
Comparison of the accessibility of websites of voivodeship cities in Poland
Drzewiecki, D., & Miłosz, M. (2025) · Journal of Computer Sciences Institute · doi:10.35784/jcsi.7354
Security and Privacy Assessment of U.S. and Non-U.S. Android E-Commerce Applications
Kishnani, U., & Das, S. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-13714-2_27
Evaluación de la accesibilidad web de las entidades de ciencia, tecnología e innovación de Cuba
Pérez, L. B., & Rodríguez, Y. S. (2025) · Palabra clave · doi:10.24215/18539912e262
Espineda, M. N., Vizmanos, F. R., & Ganados, G. N. B. (2026) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-026-01322-x
Empowering Web Accessibility with LLM Powered Code Improvement Tool
Garg, H., Karande, A., Ganwani, D., & Ghane, S. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-20609-1_39
Arana, C. L., Falconi, F., & Moquillaza, A. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30089-8_7
Papanikolaou, K., Lazaris, C., & Katiaj, P. (2026) · Platforms · doi:10.3390/platforms4030020 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Context and length effects in portuguese alternative text generation
Elisiário, V. A., Watanabe, W. M., Oliveira, E., & Sanches, S. R. R. (2026) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-026-01395-8
Voxible: An LLM-Enabled Conversational Web Plugin Designed by Blind and Low-Vision Researchers
Wikandana, I. M., Tang, K., Lyu, J., Jiang, Z., Luo, W., Zhang, W., Huang, Y., Polydorides, A., & Cho, Y. (2026) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3797867.3841193
- Authors
- Acosta-Vargas, P., Salvador-Acosta, B., Salvador-Ullauri, L., & Jadán-Guerrero, J.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Las Américas (EC)
- University of Alicante (ES)
- Universidad Indoamérica (EC)
- Corresponding author
- Acosta-Vargas, Patricia
- Venue
- PeerJ Computer Science
- Publisher
- PeerJ
- Published
- 2022-02-22
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- e891
- ISSN
- 2376-5992 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9044289
- OpenAlex
- W4212921141
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 15.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PeerJ Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- Universidad de Las Américas-Ecuador (INI.PAV.20.01)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile and Web Applications
- Keywords
- web accessibility, e-commerce platforms, WAVE tool, automatic accessibility evaluation, website ranking, access barriers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review