Cited by 36Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSurvey Methodology and NonresponsePsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Mischievous responding in Internet Gaming Disorder research

Open access
Przybylski, Andrew K.·2016·PeerJ

Abstract

The most recent update to the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) included Internet Gaming Disorder as a new potential psychiatric condition that merited further scientific study. The present research was conducted in response to the APA Substance-Related Disorders Working Group’s research call to estimate the extent to which mischievous responding—a known problematic pattern of participant self-report responding in questionnaires—is relevant to Internet Gaming Disorder research. In line with a registered sampling and analysis plan, findings from two studies (ntot= 11,908) provide clear evidence that mischievous responding is positively associated with the number of Internet Gaming Disorder indicators participants report. Results are discussed in the context of ongoing problem gaming research and the discussion provides recommendations for improving the quality of scientific practice in this area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7717/peerj.2401

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mischievous responding can introduce measurement noise that inflates relations that are logically incoherent or absurd to take at face value.

    “Mischievous responding can have the effect of introducing measurement noise that inflates relations that are logically incoherent or absurd to take at face value.”

    From Violent video game engagement is not associated with adolescents' aggressive behaviour: evidence from a registered report (2019) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Method (Participants and measures; page unavailable) uses a fictitious game to identify untruthful responses, and the Results (Confirmatory analyses; page unavailable) find that those respondents reported more Internet Gaming Disorder indicators. The Discussion says this can inflate IGD measurement, but the paper does not show that mischievous responding inflates logically incoherent relationships between variables. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Chess S 2014 Augmented regionalism: ingress as geomediated gaming narrative Information, Communication & Society 17 1105 1117 10.1080/1369118X.2014.881903 · DOI
  2. Cronbach LJ Meehl PE 1955 Construct validity in psychological tests Psychological Bulletin 52 281 302 10.1037/h0040957 13245896 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Elson M Przybylski AK Krämer N 2015 “Technology and human behavior.” Journal of Media Psychology 27 203 204 10.1027/1864-1105/a000170 · DOI
  4. Fan X Miller BC Park K-E Winward BW Christensen M Grotevant HD Tai RH 2006 An exploratory study about inaccuracy and invalidity in adolescent self-report surveys Field Methods 18 223 244 10.1177/152822X06289161 · DOI
  5. Ferguson CJ Coulson M Barnett J 2011 A meta-analysis of pathological gaming prevalence and comorbidity with mental health, academic and social problems Journal of Psychiatric Research 45 1573 1578 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.09.005 21925683 · DOI
  6. Festl R Scharkow M Quandt T 2013 Problematic computer game use among adolescents, younger and older adults Addiction 108 592 599 10.1111/add.12016 23078146 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Griffiths MD Van Rooij AJ Kardefelt-Winther D Starcevic V Király O Pallesen S Müller K Dreier M Carras M Prause N King DL Aboujaoude E Kuss DJ Pontes HM Lopez Fernandez O Nagygyorgy K Achab S Billieux J Quandt T Carbonell X Ferguson CJ Hoff RA Derevensky J Haagsma MC Delfabbro P Coulson M Hussain Z Demetrovics Z 2016 Working towards an international consensus on criteria for assessing Internet Gaming Disorder: a critical commentary on Petry et al. (2014): assessment of Internet Gaming Disorder Addiction 111 167 175 10.1111/add.13057 26669530 PMC5699464 · DOI
  8. Hasin DS O’brien CP Auriacombe M Borges G Bucholz K Budney A Compton WM Crowley T Ling W Petry NM Schuckit M Grant BF 2013 DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders: recommendations and rationale The American Journal of Psychiatry 170 834 851 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12060782 23903334 PMC3767415 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Kardefelt-Winther D 2014 Meeting the unique challenges of assessing Internet Gaming Disorder Addiction 109 1568 1570 10.1111/add.12645 25103106 · DOI
  10. King DL Haagsma MC Delfabbro PH Gradisar M Griffiths MD 2013 Toward a consensus definition of pathological video-gaming: a systematic review of psychometric assessment tools Clinical Psychology Review 33 331 342 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.01.002 23396015 · DOI
  11. Morey RD Chambers CD Etchells PJ Harris CR Hoekstra R Lakens D Lewandowsky S Morey CC Newman DP Schönbrodt FD Vanpaemel W Wagenmakers E-J Zwaan RA 2016 The peer reviewers’ openness initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review Royal Society Open Science 3 150547 10.1098/rsos.150547 26909182 PMC4736937 · DOI
  12. Petry NM Rehbein F Gentile DA Lemmens JS Rumpf H-J Mößle T Bischof TM Tao R Fung DSS Borges G Auriacombe M González Ibáñez A Tam P O’Brien CP 2014 An international consensus for assessing Internet Gaming Disorder using the new DSM-5 approach: Internet Gaming Disorder Addiction 109 1399 1406 10.1111/add.12457 24456155 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Przybylski AK Weinstein N Murayama K Internet gaming disorder: investigating the clinical relevance of a new phenomenon American Journal of Psychiatry In Press 27809571
  14. Robinson-Cimpian JP 2014 Inaccurate estimation of disparities due to mischievous responders several suggestions to assess conclusions Educational Researcher 43 171 185 10.3102/0013189X14534297 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Sell R Goldberg S Conron K 2015 The Utility of an online convenience panel for reaching rare and dispersed populations PLoS ONE 10 e0144011 10.1371/journal.pone.0144011 26641840 PMC4671660 · DOI
  16. Wan C-S Chiou W-B 2006 Psychological motives and online games addiction: a test of flow theory and humanistic needs theory for taiwanese adolescents CyberPsychology & Behavior 9 317 324 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.317 16780399 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Przybylski, A. K.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Przybylski, Andrew K.
Venue
PeerJ
Publisher
PeerJ
Published
2016-09-13
Volume
4
Pages
e2401
ISSN
2167-8359 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2519647477
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
FWCI
18.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PeerJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
John Fell Fund (CZD08320)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
internet gaming disorder, problem gaming, DSM-5, questionnaire validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review