Cited by 36Survey Methodology and NonresponsePsychometric Methodologies and TestingChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Effects of mischievous responding on universal mental health screening: I love rum raisin ice cream, really I do!

Furlong, Michael J., Fullchange, Aileen, Dowdy, Erin·2017·School Psychology Quarterly

Abstract

Student surveys are often used for school-based mental health screening; hence, it is critical to evaluate the authenticity of information obtained via the self-report format. The objective of this study was to examine the possible effects of mischievous response patterns on school-based screening results. The present study included 1,857 high school students who completed a schoolwide screening for complete mental health. Student responses were reviewed to detect possible mischievous responses and to examine their association with other survey results. Consistent with previous research, mischievous responding was evaluated by items that are legitimate to ask of all students (e.g., How much do you weigh? and How many siblings do you have?). Responses were considered "mischievous" when a student selected multiple extreme, unusual (less than 5% incidence) response options, such as weighing more than 225 pounds and having 10 or more siblings. Only 1.8% of the students responded in extreme ways to 2 or more of 7 mischievous response items. When compared with other students, the mischievous responders were less likely to declare that they answered items honestly, were more likely to finish the survey in less than 10 min, reported lower levels of life satisfaction and school connectedness, and reported higher levels of emotional and behavioral distress. When applying a dual-factor mental health screening framework to the responses, mischievous responders were less likely to be cate…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/spq0000168

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Furlong, M. J., Fullchange, A., & Dowdy, E.
Affiliations
University of California System (US)
Venue
School Psychology Quarterly
Published
2017-09
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
320-335
ISSN
  • 1045-3830 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1560
OpenAlex
W2491499331
Cited by
36
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • School Psychology Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
school-based screening, high school students, life satisfaction, school connectedness, survey completion time
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Humans, Mass Screening, Psychometrics, Schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review