Cited by 420Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsDigital Games and Media

Problematic computer game use among adolescents, younger and older adults

Festl, Ruth, Scharkow, Michael, Quandt, Thorsten·2013·Addiction

Abstract

Aims: Playing digital games has been associated with forms of addictive behavior. Past research on the subject has often been criticized on theoretical and empirical grounds, due mainly to measurement or sampling issues. The present study aims to overcome these two limitations, and presents data from a representative study in G ermany using an already established instrument for measuring problematic game use. Design: Large‐scale, representative study using a computer‐assisted telephone survey. Setting: G ermany. Participants: A total of 580 adolescents between 14 and 18 years of age, 1866 younger adults between 19–39 years and 1936 older adults aged 40 years and older (overall n = 4382). Measurements: Problematic game use was measured with the G aming A ddiction S hort S cale (GAS), which covers seven criteria including salience, withdrawal and conflicts. Additionally, differential aspects of personality, as well as gaming behaviour, were measured. Findings: Only seven respondents [0.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1, 0.3] met all criteria of the GAS Scale. In contrast, 3.7% (95% CI: 3.1, 4.3) of the respondents can be considered problematic users, meeting at least half these conditions. The percentage of problematic gamers among adolescents is above average (7.6%, 95% CI: 5.6, 10.1). High GAS scores are associated with aggression, low sociability and self‐efficacy and lower satisfaction with life. Additionally, these scores correspond with intensive use and preferences for certain gaming genres across all age groups. Conclusions: Following G aming A ddiction S hort S cale criteria, gaming addiction is currently not a widespread phenomenon among adolescents and adults in G ermany. G aming A ddiction S hort S cale scores are associated with intensive use, as well as certain problematic aspects of individuals' personalities and social lives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.12016

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Festl, R., Scharkow, M., & Quandt, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Hohenheim (DE)
  • University of Münster (DE)
Corresponding author
Festl, Ruth
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11-19
Volume
108
Issue
3
Pages
592-599
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1519933583
Cited by
420
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 10
FWCI
11.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
Keywords
gaming addiction, video games, adolescents, young adults, older adults, aggression, self-efficacy, life satisfaction, sociability, gaming intensity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aggression, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Personality Disorders, Prevalence, Behavior, Addictive, Age Distribution, Video Games, Self Efficacy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review