Evaluation of 3 Hemoglobin A1c Point of Care Instruments. Point of Care Testing for HbA1c: Evaluation of Cobas b101, B-Analyst and Afinion™
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The systematic review and meta-analysis included 11 studies involving 1,593 participants and 3,285 paired HbA1c measurements comparing POC devices with reference HPLC-based laboratory methods.
“A total of 11 studies involving 1,593 participants and 3,285 paired measurements were included.”
From Comparison of point‑of‑care HbA1c devices with laboratory HPLC methods: A systematic review and meta‑analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Njoroge, A., Augusto, O. J., Page, S. T., Kigondu, C., Oluka, M. N., Puttkammer, N. H., & Farquhar, C. (2021) · Endocrinology Diabetes & Metabolism · doi:10.1002/edm2.292 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Analysis: Investigating the quality of POCT devices for HbA1c, what are our next steps?
Lenters‐Westra, E., & English, E. (2019) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296819850838 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Wei, Y., Gu, M., Ren, Y., & Hu, Z. (2026) · Biomedical Reports · doi:10.3892/br.2026.2120 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Friedecky, B., & Kratochvíla, J. (2018) · Klinická biochemie a metabolismus · doi:10.61568/kbm.2018.024
- Authors
- Sanchez-Mora, C., Fernandez-Riejos, P., Maesa-Marquez, J., & Gonzalez-Rodriguez, C.
- Venue
- Clinical Laboratory
- Publisher
- Clinical Laboratory Publications
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 07+08/2017
- Pages
- 1107-1112
- ISSN
- 1433-6510 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2744675627
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Laboratory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Advanced Glycation End Products research
- Keywords
- HbA1c, point-of-care testing, glycated hemoglobin measurement, instrument evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Point-of-Care Testing, Blood Cell Count, Diabetes Mellitus, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Point-of-Care Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
