Cited by 451LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareGender, Sexuality, and Education

Health care disparities among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth: A literature review

Open access
Hafeez, Hudaisa, Zeshan, Muhammad, Tahir, Muhammad A, Jahan, Nusrat, Naveed, Sadiq·2017·Cureus

Abstract

About 3.5% Americans identify themselves as lesbian, gay, or bisexual while 0.3% identify themselves as transgender. The LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) community belongs to almost every race, ethnicity, religion, age, and socioeconomic group. The LGBT youth are at a higher risk for substance use, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), cancers, cardiovascular diseases, obesity, bullying, isolation, rejection, anxiety, depression, and suicide as compared to the general population. LGBT youth receive poor quality of care due to stigma, lack of healthcare providers' awareness, and insensitivity to the unique needs of this community. The main objective of this literature review is to highlight the challenges faced by the LGBT youth and to enhance the awareness among physicians about the existing disparities in order to provide a more comprehensive, evidence-based, and humane medical care to this community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7759/cureus.1184

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hafeez, H., Zeshan, M., Tahir, M. A., Jahan, N., & Naveed, S.
Affiliations
Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center (US)
Corresponding author
Naveed, Sadiq
Venue
Cureus
Published
2017-04-20
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
e1184-e1184
ISSN
2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2606192631
Cited by
451
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 5
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
Keywords
health care disparities, LGBTQ youth, LGBTQ health, health stigma, substance use, sexually transmitted infections, mental health, suicide, bullying, physician awareness, quality of care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review