Cited by 540LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Sexual Identity, Sex of Sexual Contacts, and Health-Related Behaviors Among Students in Grades 9–12 — United States and Selected Sites, 2015

Open access
Kann, Laura, Olsen, Emily O’Malley, McManus, Tim, Harris, William A., Shanklin, Shari L., Flint, Katherine H., Queen, Barbara, Lowry, Richard +7 more·2016·MMWR. Surveillance Summaries

Abstract

PROBLEM: Sexual identity and sex of sexual contacts can both be used to identify sexual minority youth. Significant health disparities exist between sexual minority and nonsexual minority youth. However, not enough is known about health-related behaviors that contribute to negative health outcomes among sexual minority youth and how the prevalence of these health-related behaviors compare with the prevalence of health-related behaviors among nonsexual minorities. REPORTING PERIOD: September 2014-December 2015. DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEM: The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) monitors six categories of priority health-related behaviors among youth and young adults: 1) behaviors that contribute to unintentional injuries and violence; 2) tobacco use; 3) alcohol and other drug use; 4) sexual behaviors related to unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, including human immunodeficiency virus infection; 5) unhealthy dietary behaviors; and 6) physical inactivity. In addition, YRBSS monitors the prevalence of obesity and asthma and other priority health-related behaviors. YRBSS includes a national school-based Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) conducted by CDC and state and large urban school district school-based YRBSs conducted by state and local education and health agencies. For the 2015 YRBSS cycle, a question to ascertain sexual identity and a question to ascertain sex of sexual contacts was added for the first time to the national YRBS questionnaire and to the standard YRBS questionnaire used by the states and large urban school districts as a starting point for their YRBS questionnaires. This report summarizes results for 118 health-related behaviors plus obesity, overweight, and asthma by sexual identity and sex of sexual contacts from the 2015 national survey, 25 state surveys, and 19 large urban school district surveys conducted among students in grades 9-12. RESULTS: Across the 18 violence-related risk behaviors nationwide, the prevalence of 16 was higher among gay, lesbian, and bisexual students than heterosexual students and the prevalence of 15 was higher among students who had sexual contact with only the same sex or with both sexes than students who had sexual contact with only the opposite sex. Across the 13 tobacco use-related risk behaviors, the prevalence of 11 was higher among gay, lesbian, and bisexual students than heterosexual students and the prevalence of 10 was higher among students who had sexual contact with only the same sex or with both sexes than students who had sexual contact with only the opposite sex. Similarly, across the 19 alcohol or other drug use-related risk behaviors, the prevalence of 18 was higher among gay, lesbian, and bisexual students than heterosexual students and the prevalence of 17 was higher among students who had sexual contact with only the same sex or with both sexes than students who had sexual contact with only the opposite sex. This pattern also was evident across the six sexual risk behaviors. The prevalence of five of these behaviors was higher among gay, lesbian, and bisexual students than heterosexual students and the prevalence of four was higher among students who had sexual contact with only the same sex or with both sexes than students who had sexual contact with only the opposite sex. No clear pattern of differences emerged for birth control use, dietary behaviors, and physical activity. INTERPRETATION: The majority of sexual minority students cope with the transition from childhood through adolescence to adulthood successfully and become healthy and productive adults. However, this report documents that sexual minority students have a higher prevalence of many health-risk behaviors compared with nonsexual minority students. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION: To reduce the disparities in health-risk behaviors among sexual minority students, it is important to raise awareness of the problem; facilitate access to education, health care, and evidence-based interventions designed to address priority health-risk behaviors among sexual minority youth; and continue to implement YRBSS at the national, state, and large urban school district levels to document and monitor the effect of broad policy and programmatic interventions on the health-related behaviors of sexual minority youth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.ss6509a1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transgender young people are about three times more likely than cisgender peers to have made a plan for suicide.

    “Similarly, compared to their cisgender peers, transgender young people were about three times more likely to have thought about suicide (16% vs. 44%, respectively), three times more likely to have made a plan for suicide (13% vs. 39%), and five times more likely to have attempted suicide (6% vs. 29%) [3].”

    From Findings from a feasibility study of an adapted cognitive behavioral therapy group intervention to reduce depression among lgbtq (Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer) young people (2019) · cites this paper as [3]

    The “Made a Suicide Plan” section reports a roughly threefold difference, but it compares gay, lesbian, and bisexual students (38.2%) with heterosexual students (11.9%). It does not report a transgender-versus-cisgender comparison or the cited 39% versus 13% figures. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Transgender young people are about three times more likely than cisgender peers to have thought about suicide.

    “Similarly, compared to their cisgender peers, transgender young people were about three times more likely to have thought about suicide (16% vs. 44%, respectively), three times more likely to have made a plan for suicide (13% vs. 39%), and five times more likely to have attempted suicide (6% vs. 29%) [3].”

    From Findings from a feasibility study of an adapted cognitive behavioral therapy group intervention to reduce depression among lgbtq (Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer) young people (2019) · cites this paper as [3]

    The “Seriously Considered Attempting Suicide” section reports an approximately threefold difference, but it compares gay, lesbian, or bisexual students (42.8%) with heterosexual students (14.8%). It does not establish the claimed comparison between transgender and cisgender young people; sexual identity and gender identity are different categories. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Depression disproportionately affects young people who identify as LGBTQ.

    “Depression is a debilitating and burdensome mental health disorder that disproportionately affects young people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer (LGBTQ) [1,2,3,4].”

    From Findings from a feasibility study of an adapted cognitive behavioral therapy group intervention to reduce depression among lgbtq (Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer) young people (2019) · cites this paper as [3]

    The “Felt Sad or Hopeless” section reports a higher prevalence among gay, lesbian, and bisexual high-school students (60.4%) than heterosexual students (26.4%). That measure is not a depression diagnosis, and the “Data Collection Procedures and Questionnaires” section shows that the sexual-identity question did not identify transgender or queer students separately. The source therefore supports a narrower disparity than the sentence attributes to it. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Transgender young people are about five times more likely than cisgender peers to have attempted suicide.

    “Similarly, compared to their cisgender peers, transgender young people were about three times more likely to have thought about suicide (16% vs. 44%, respectively), three times more likely to have made a plan for suicide (13% vs. 39%), and five times more likely to have attempted suicide (6% vs. 29%) [3].”

    From Findings from a feasibility study of an adapted cognitive behavioral therapy group intervention to reduce depression among lgbtq (Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer) young people (2019) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Attempted Suicide section reports a roughly fivefold difference (29.4% versus 6.4%), but it compares gay, lesbian, and bisexual students with heterosexual students—not transgender students with cisgender peers. The Data Collection Procedures and Questionnaires section describes sexual-identity and sexual-contact questions, not a measure of transgender identity. The claimed population comparison is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • National prevalence data show that over half of LGBTQ young people experienced depressive symptoms at significantly higher rates compared to cisgender heterosexual young people.

    “This is unsurprising given the national prevalence data showing over half of LGBTQ young people experienced depressive symptoms at significantly higher rates compared to cisgender heterosexual young people [3,4].”

    From Findings from a feasibility study of an adapted cognitive behavioral therapy group intervention to reduce depression among lgbtq (Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer) young people (2019) · cites this paper as [3]

    The “Felt Sad or Hopeless” section (Table 24; page not provided) reports that 60.4% of gay, lesbian, and bisexual high-school students nationwide experienced prolonged sadness or hopelessness, compared with 26.4% of heterosexual students. This supports the over-half figure and the higher prevalence, but the survey measured sexual identity, not transgender or cisgender status, and its outcome was sadness or hopelessness rather than a general measure of depressive symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Robin L, Brener ND, Donahue SF, Hack T, Hale K, Goodenow C. Associations between health risk behaviors and opposite-, same-, and both-sex sexual partners in representative samples of vermont and massachusetts high school students. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:349-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.156.4.349 · DOI
  2. Pathela P, Schillinger JA. Sexual behaviors and sexual violence: adolescents with opposite-, same-, or both-sex partners. Pediatrics 2010;126:879-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-0396 · DOI
  3. Garofalo R, Wolf RC, Kessel S, Palfrey SJ, DuRant RH. The association between health risk behaviors and sexual orientation among a school- based sample of adolescents. Pediatrics 1998;101:895-902. http://dx.doi. org/10.1542/peds.101.5.895 · DOI
  4. Mayer KH, Bradford JB, Makadon HJ, Stall R, Goldhammer H, Landers S. Sexual and gender minority health: what we know and what needs to be done. Am J Public Health 2008;98:989-95. http://dx.doi. org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.127811 · DOI
  5. Saewyc EM, Bauer GR, Skay CL, et al. Measuring sexual orientation in adolescent health surveys: evaluation of eight school-based surveys. J Adolesc Health 2004;35:345.e1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jadohealth.2004.06.002 · DOI
  6. Savin-Williams RC. A critique of research on sexual-minority youths. J Adolesc 2001;24:5-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ jado.2000.0369 · DOI
  7. Coker TR, Austin SB, Schuster MA. The health and health care of lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents. Annu Rev Public Health 2010;31:457-77. http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/ annurev.publhealth.012809.103636?cookieSet=1 · DOI
  8. Institute of Medicine. The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: building a foundation for better understanding. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK64806
  9. Brener ND, Kann L, McManus T, Kinchen SA, Sundberg EC, Ross JG. Reliability of the 1999 youth risk behavior survey questionnaire. J Adolesc Health 2002;31:336-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S1054-139X(02)00339-7 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Espelage DL, Aragon SR, Birkett M. Homophobic teasing, psychological outcomes, and sexual orientation among high school students: What influence do parents and schools have? School Psych Rev 2008;37:202-16.
  11. Goodenow C, Szalacha L, Westheimer K. School support groups, other school factors, and the safety of sexual minority adolescents. Psychol Sch 2006;43:573-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.20173 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Saewyc EM, Konishi C, Rose HA, Homma Y. School-based strategies to reduce suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and discrimination among sexual minority and heterosexual adolescents in Western Canada. Int J Child Youth Fam Stud 2014;5:89-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.18357/ ijcyfs.saewyce.512014 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Brener ND, Mcmanus T, Galuska DA, Lowry R, Wechsler H. Reliability and validity of self-reported height and weight among high school students. J Adolesc Health 2003;32:281-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S1054-139X(02)00708-5 (21.6-30.3) 26.9 (19.2-36.4) 33.3 (21.4-47.9) 28.3 (22.9-34.3) 34.7 (29.2-40.7) 23.4 (18.8-28.8) California 33.5 (30.9-36.1) 34.2 (27.7-41.4) 29.1 (17.6-44.1) 33.3 (29.7-37.2) 40.8 (29.6-53.0) 32.6 (28.8-36.8) Connecticut 31.6 (28.8-34.5) 22.8 (15.3-32.5) 22.6 (14.4-33.6) 29.5 (25.5-33.8) 27.5 (18.0-39.7) 31.8 (28.8-35.0) Delaware 30.2 (27.7-32.9) 34.6 (26.8-43.4) 35.6 (25.5-47.2) 31.8 (27.5-36.3) 45.8 (35.7-56.3) 29.4 (26.3-32.7) Florida 33.1 (31.4-34.8) 34.4 (30.5-38.5) 32.2 (24.7-40.7) 36.0 (33.6-38.4) 35.0 (30.5-39.7) 29.6 (28.0-31.2) Hawaii 22.6 (21.1-24.2) 25.2 (20.8-30.3) 22.8 (17.7-28.7) 23.3 (20.8-26.0) 24.8 (18.7-32.1) 22.3 (20.3-24.5) Illinois 31.1 (28.2-34.2) 28.5 (22.3-35.6) 29.8 (18.0-45.2) 33.3 (29.1-37.9) 34.2 (27.0-42.2) 29.3 (26.0-32.8) Indiana 27.0 (23.1-31.3) 15.7 (10.7-22.4) 24.0 (13.0-39.9) 25.0 (19.6-31.3) 16.5 (11.2-23.5) 28.2 (22.7-34.5) Kentucky 20.0 (18.1-22.1) 28.2 (21.8-35.6) 27.2 (17.0-40.6) 21.5 (18.8-24.5) 32.1 (24.9-40.2) 17.8 (14.9-21.1) Maine 30.1 (28.5-31.7) 28.2 (25.4-31.2) 32.3 (26.2-39.1) 30.2 (28.7-31.8) 28.3 (24.9-32.0) 30.0 (27.8-32.3) Maryland 29.2 (28.6-29.7) 25.4 (23.9-26.8) 28.1 (25.8-30.5) 30.3 (29.5-31.2) 28.1 (26.3-29.9) 28.7 (28.0-29.5) Massachusetts 31.4 (29.3-33.5) 27.7 (22.0-34.2) 35.3 (24.4-47.9) 32.2 (29.9-34.7) 31.7 (23.6-41.1) 30.4 (26.8-34.3) Michigan 28.4 (25.3-31.7) 19.8 (14.0-27.1) 19.3 (11.9-29.9) 29.3 (26.0-32.8) 23.2 (16.0-32.3) 27.2 (23.7-31.0) Nevada 28.9 (26.1-31.9) 30.9 (19.6-45.0) 31.8 (20.2-46.2) 30.0 (25.2-35.3) 32.3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kann, L., Olsen, E. O., McManus, T., Harris, W. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Queen, B., Lowry, R., Chyen, D., Whittle, L., Thornton, J., Lim, C., Yamakawa, Y., Brener, N., & Zaza, S.
Affiliations
  • National Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis STD and TB Prevention (US)
  • ICF International, Rockville, Maryland
  • Westat (United States) (US)
Venue
MMWR. Surveillance Summaries
Published
2016-08-12
Volume
65
Issue
9
Pages
1-202
ISSN
  • 1545-8636 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-0738
OpenAlex
W2516625584
Cited by
540
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 7
FWCI
119.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • MMWR Surveillance Summaries (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
sexual minority youth, sexual identity, health behavior, tobacco use, alcohol and other drug use, sexual behavior, sexually transmitted infections, obesity, asthma, physical inactivity, dietary behavior, high school students, health disparities, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, bisexual students, gay and lesbian students, heterosexual students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Bisexuality, Female, Humans, Male, Minority Groups, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk-Taking, Sexual Behavior, Students, United States, Violence, Wounds and Injuries, Health Behavior, Homosexuality, Male, Homosexuality, Female, Substance-Related Disorders, Heterosexuality, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review