Cited by 3Endometriosis Research and TreatmentTeratomas and Epidermoid CystsGynecological conditions and treatments

Giant Abdominal Wall Endometrioma: A Case Report

Open access
Faqeeh, Hind M, Al Zaher, Fatimah A, Maashi, Afnan M, Albaqshi, Mohammed A, Aljeshi, Ammar A·2021·Cureus

Abstract

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity. Endometriosis may involve a wide spectrum of anatomic locations, but it typically involves pelvic locations. We report the case of a 45-year-old woman who presented with a history of abdominal pain and swelling. She first noticed the swelling eight months prior to presentation, and it had gradually progressed in size. The patient reported that the swelling increased in size during menses. Physical examination revealed a well-defined firm mass to the right of the midline. The mass had a smooth surface but limited mobility after abdominal wall muscle contraction, suggesting an infiltration of the underlying muscular structures. The findings demonstrated by computed tomography of the abdomen confirmed the diagnosis of abdominal wall endometrioma. The patient underwent successful resection of the lesion with complete resolution of her symptoms.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This case report describes a 45-year-old woman with a giant abdominal wall endometrioma presenting as cyclic right-sided abdominal pain and swelling that began 8 months earlier. Surgical resection, including part of the underlying rectus abdominis muscle, led to complete symptom resolution at 6-month follow-up.

Key findings

  • A 45-year-old woman had right-sided abdominal pain and swelling for 8 months; the swelling increased during menses, and she had undergone cesarean section 2 years before presentation.
  • Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT showed a large lobulated, heterogeneously enhancing mass measuring 17 × 15 × 10 cm, infiltrating the underlying muscular structure and displacing adjacent structures, confirming abdominal wall endometrioma.
  • She underwent surgical resection of the endometrioma along with part of the underlying rectus abdominis muscle; blood loss was minimal, the postoperative course was uneventful, and she was discharged 7 days after operation.
  • At 6-month follow-up, she reported major satisfaction and complete resolution of symptoms; the discussion cites an estimated incidence of abdominal wall endometrioma after cesarean section of 0.03%–0.45%.

Methods

  • Single case report of one 45-year-old woman evaluated with clinical history, physical examination, basic laboratory investigations, and contrast-enhanced abdominal CT.
  • The patient underwent surgical resection of the abdominal wall endometrioma and part of the rectus abdominis muscle, followed by outpatient follow-up for 6 months.
  • No formal statistical analysis or comparison group is reported.

Limitations

  • The paper states no explicit limitations.
  • Evident limitations include the single-case design, lack of generalizability, and short 6-month follow-up, which does not assess long-term recurrence even though recurrence is described as a known complication.
  • The text does not report histopathologic confirmation of the endometrioma; diagnosis is described as confirmed by CT.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7759/cureus.12766

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 12 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The patient had complete resolution of her symptoms after resection.

    “The patient underwent successful resection of the lesion with complete resolution of her symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The endometrioma had risen at the site of the previous scar of the cesarean section.

    “It was noted that the endometrioma had risen at the site of the previous scar of the cesarean section.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The swelling increased in size during menses.

    “The patient reported that the swelling increased in size during menses.”
    • Also stated in: § Case presentation · plain
      “The patient reported that the swelling increased in size during menses and was interfering with her daily activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The patient underwent successful resection of the lesion.

    “The patient underwent successful resection of the lesion with complete resolution of her symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The patient had complete resolution of her symptoms.

    “complete resolution of her symptoms”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
  • May combine two claims. 2
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The patient's menstrual periods were not associated with menorrhagia.

    “Her menstrual periods were regular and were not associated with menorrhagia.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The postoperative course was uneventful.

    “The postoperative course was uneventful.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The swelling interfered with the patient's daily activities.

    “The patient reported that the swelling increased in size during menses and was interfering with her daily activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Basic hematological and biochemical laboratory investigations were within normal limits.

    “Basic hematological and biochemical laboratory investigations were within normal limits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The CT scan demonstrated a large lobulated mass with heterogeneous enhancement, measuring 17 × 15 × 10 cm and infiltrating the underlying muscular structure.

    “The CT scan demonstrated a large lobulated mass with heterogenous enhancement, measuring 17 × 15 × 10 cm and infiltrating the underlying muscular structure”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The mass lesion displaced adjacent structures.

    “The mass lesion was noted to displace adjacent structures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The patient reported major satisfaction.

    “reported major satisfaction”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The associated pain was moderately improved after the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

    “The associated pain was moderately improved after the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    There was minimal blood loss during surgery.

    “There was minimal blood loss.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The mass had a smooth surface.

    “The mass had a smooth surface but limited mobility after abdominal wall muscle contraction, suggesting an infiltration of the underlying muscular structures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The patient first noticed the swelling eight months before presentation.

    “She first noticed the swelling eight months prior to presentation”
    • Also stated in: § Case presentation · plain
      “She first noticed the swelling eight months ago”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The patient had no prior history of gynecological conditions.

    “She did not have any prior history of gynecological conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The patient reported no history of bowel or bladder symptoms.

    “However, there were no changes in the overlying skin and she reported no history of bowel or bladder symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The patient was a 45-year-old woman who presented with right-sided abdominal pain and swelling.

    “We present the case of a 45-year-old woman who presented to the outpatient department with a history of right-sided abdominal pain and swelling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The patient was discharged seven days after the operation.

    “The patient was discharged seven days after the operation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The patient was followed up in the outpatient department for six months.

    “The patient was followed up in the outpatient department for six months”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The patient's menstrual periods were regular.

    “Her menstrual periods were regular and were not associated with menorrhagia.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The present case demonstrated that abdominal wall endometrioma may present as a giant lesion causing a pressure effect on the underlying structures.

    “The present case demonstrated that endometrioma may present as a giant lesion causing a pressure effect on the underlying structures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    There were no changes in the overlying skin.

    “However, there were no changes in the overlying skin and she reported no history of bowel or bladder symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The patient underwent a cesarean section two years before presentation due to fetal distress.

    “The patient underwent a cesarean section two years before the presentation due to fetal distress.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Endometriosis may involve a wide spectrum of anatomic locations.

    “Endometriosis may involve a wide spectrum of anatomic locations, but it typically involves pelvic locations [4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Gustofson RL, Kim N, Liu S, Stratton. Endometriosis and the appendix: a case series and comprehensive review of the literature. Fertil Steril. 2006, 86:298-303. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.076 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The rarity of abdominal wall endometrioma suggests that genetic factors could play a role.

    “the rarity of abdominal wall endometrioma suggests that genetic factors could play a role”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Dissemination of endometrial tissue into the surgical scar is common after cesarean section.
    • Rests on an assumption: Some cases of spontaneous abdominal wall endometrioma in patients without a history of uterine surgeries have been reported.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The estimated incidence of abdominal wall endometrioma after cesarean section is between 0.03% and 0.45%.

    “The estimated incidence of abdominal wall endometrioma after cesarean section is between 0.03% and 0.45% [3,6].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] Vercellini P, Vigano P, Somigliana E, Fedele L. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014, 10:261-275. 10.1038/nrendo.2013.255 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] Bektaş H, Bilsel Y, Sarı YS, et al.. Abdominal wall endometrioma; a 10-year experience and brief review of the literature. J Surg Res. 2010, 164:77-81. 10.1016/j.jss.2010.07.043 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Endometriosis typically involves pelvic locations.

    “Endometriosis may involve a wide spectrum of anatomic locations, but it typically involves pelvic locations [4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Gustofson RL, Kim N, Liu S, Stratton. Endometriosis and the appendix: a case series and comprehensive review of the literature. Fertil Steril. 2006, 86:298-303. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.076 source

      Not checked in the free run.

24 of 24
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Computed tomography findings are sufficient to confirm the diagnosis of abdominal wall endometrioma without histopathological confirmation.

    “The findings demonstrated by computed tomography of the abdomen confirmed the diagnosis of abdominal wall endometrioma.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Dissemination of endometrial tissue into the surgical scar is common after cesarean section.

    “As the dissemination of endometrial tissue into the surgical scar is common after cesarean section”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some cases of spontaneous abdominal wall endometrioma in patients without a history of uterine surgeries have been reported.

    “some cases of spontaneous abdominal wall endometrioma in patients without a history of uterine surgeries have been reported.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Abdominal wall endometrioma is very rare.

    “Although very rare, this clinical entity should be kept in mind when encountering a woman with cyclic abdominal pain and swelling.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a few reports describe the use of reconstructive techniques such as abdominal wall plasty and the flap technique, to prevent recurrence and herniation.

    “only a few reports describe the use of reconstructive techniques such as abdominal wall plasty and the flap technique, to prevent recurrence and herniation [4–6].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Mass described on opposite sides of the abdomen

    Major

    The case presentation places the mass on the right, while the CT figure caption calls it left-sided.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faqeeh, H. M., Al Zaher, F. A., Maashi, A. M., Albaqshi, M. A., & Aljeshi, A. A.
Affiliations
Medical University of Warsaw (PL)
Venue
Cureus
Published
2021-01-18
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
e12766-e12766
ISSN
2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125199563
Cited by
3
References
8
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Teratomas and Epidermoid Cysts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
endometriosis, abdominal wall mass, abdominal pain, surgical resection, computed tomography diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review