Cited by 29Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer

The Effectiveness of Metformin in Diabetes Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Patel, Dhara, Ayesha, Ismat E, Monson, Neetha R, Klair, Nimra, Patel, Utkarsh, Saxena, Ayushi, Hamid, Pousette·2023·Cureus

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a growing global health concern, and prevention strategies play a crucial role in reducing its burden. Metformin has been widely studied as a potential intervention for diabetes prevention, but its overall effectiveness and impact on various populations remain unclear. This study aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence on the effectiveness of metformin in diabetes prevention. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar for articles published from inception to June 2023. The reference lists of the included studies were also searched to retrieve possible additional studies. Any quantitative data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4. A P-value of 0.05 was adopted as the significance threshold. Our analysis included 17 studies with a total sample size of 30,474. Our meta-analysis included two key analyses. First, the meta-analysis evaluating the effects of metformin on prediabetes demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of progressing to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The pooled odds ratio (OR) was 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.80), indicating a 35% lower odds of developing T2DM among individuals with prediabetes who received metformin interventions compared to control groups. Secondly, the meta-analysis assessing the efficacy of metformin interventions in preventing T2DM yielded a significant reduction in the risk of developing the disease. The pooled risk ratio was 0.58 (95% CI 0.44-0.77), indicating a 42% lower risk of developing T2DM in individuals receiving metformin interventions compared to those in non-metformin intervention groups. These findings provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of metformin in preventing the progression of prediabetes to T2DM and reducing the overall incidence of the disease. The review demonstrated that metformin is effective in reducing the risk of developing diabetes mellitus among individuals at risk for the disease. The findings highlight the potential of metformin as a valuable intervention for diabetes prevention, particularly in high-risk populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7759/cureus.46108

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Metformin is a highly effective and widely adopted intervention for both managing T2D and preventing its onset in high-risk individuals.

    “Metformin is a highly effective and widely adopted intervention for both managing type 2 diabetes (T2D) and preventing its onset in high-risk individuals [20,27].”

    From Economic evaluation of wearable fitness trackers versus metformin for preventing type 2 diabetes in the UK population (2025) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Abstract reports a 42% lower risk of developing T2DM with metformin, and the Conclusions describe it as a valuable prevention intervention for high-risk populations. The Introduction calls metformin an oral antidiabetic drug, but the passages do not establish that it is highly effective for managing existing T2D or widely adopted for either purpose. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]Metformin Corcoran C Jacobs TF Treasure Island, FL StatPearls Publishing 2022 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK518983/ 30085525

Authors
Patel, D., Ayesha, I. E., Monson, N. R., Klair, N., Patel, U., Saxena, A., & Hamid, P.
Affiliations
California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Patel, Dhara
Venue
Cureus
Published
2023-09-28
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
e46108-e46108
ISSN
2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387117760
Cited by
29
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Keywords
metformin, diabetes prevention, type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, prediabetes progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review