CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 59

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

10 Steps to Conduct a Systematic Review

Calderon Martinez, Ernesto, Flores Valdés, Jose R, Castillo, Jaqueline L, Castillo, Jennifer V, Blanco Montecino, Ronald M, Morin Jimenez, Julio E, Arriaga Escamilla, David, Diarte, Edna·2023·Cureus
DOI 10.7759/cureus.51422PMC PMC10828625
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7759/cureus.51422

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Boolean operators Boolean operators help break down and narrow down the search. "AND" will narrow your search so you get fewer results. It tells the database that your search results must include every one of your search terms. "OR" means MORE results. OR tells the database that you want results that mention one or both of your search terms. "NOT" means you are telling the database that you wish to have information related to the first term but not the second. Image credits to authors of the articles (Created on www.canva.com)
Figure 1 Boolean operators Boolean operators help break down and narrow down the search. "AND" will narrow your search so you get fewer results. It tells the database that your search results must include every one of your search terms. "OR" means MORE results. OR tells the database that you want results that mention one or both of your search terms. "NOT" means you are telling the database that you wish to have information related to the first term but not the second. Image credits to authors of the articles (Created on www.canva.com)CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. About the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Accessed. December 8, 2023: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/about-cdsr.
  2. Bettany-Saltikov J. How to do a systematic literature review in nursing: a step-by-step guide. Open University Press, United Kingdom; 2016.
  3. Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007, 7:1-6. 10.1186/1472-6947-7-16/TABLES/2 · DOI
  4. Livier Castillo J, Flores Valdés JR, Maney Orellana M, et al.. The use and efficacy of oral phenylephrine versus placebo treating nasal congestion over the years on adults: a systematic review. Cureus. 2023, 15:e49074. 10.7759/cureus.49074 · DOI
  5. Calderon Martinez E, Herrera D, Mogan S, et al.. Impact of silymarin supplements on liver enzyme levels: a systematic review. Cureus. 2023, 15:e47608. 10.7759/cureus.47608 · DOI
  6. Freedman SB, Adler M, Seshadri R, Powell EC. Oral ondansetron for gastroenteritis in a pediatric emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2006, 354:1698-705. 10.1056/NEJMoa055119 · DOI
  7. Embase. The Medical Research Database for High-Quality, Comprehensive Evidence. Accessed: December 9, 2023: https://www.elsevier.com/products/embase.
  8. ScienceDirect. Elsevier’s Premier Platform of Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Literature. Accessed: December 10, 2023: https://www.elsevier.com/products/sciencedirect.
  9. Covidence. The World's #1 Systematic Review Tool. Accessed: December 10, 2023: http://2023.
  10. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Higgins JP. Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018, 8:e019703. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019703 · DOI · Paper page
  11. What Is GRADE? | BMJ Best Practice. Accessed. December 13, 2023: https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/what-is-grade/.
  12. Johnston J, Barrett A, Stenfors T. How to … synthesise qualitative data. Clin Teach. 2020, 17:378-81. 10.1111/tct.13169 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Calderon Martinez, E., Flores Valdés, J. R., Castillo, J. L., Castillo, J. V., Blanco Montecino, R. M., Morin Jimenez, J. E., Arriaga Escamilla, D., & Diarte, E.
Venue
Cureus
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2023-12-31
ISSN
2168-8184
DOI
10.7759/cureus.51422
PMC
PMC10828625
Cited by
59
References
11
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review