Cited by 1Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthLipid metabolism and disordersCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Inclisiran: a systematic review exploring the revolutionary approach of twice-yearly dosing regimen in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia

Open access
Singareddy, Sanjana, Dhakal, Surakchhya, Limbaña, Therese Anne, Murugan, Vignesh, Nazmin, Farhana, Garcia, Jian, Khan, Safeera·2024·Cureus

Abstract

The global burden of hyperlipidemia is on the rise, along with an increase in associated cardiovascular complications. Since most of the patients affected by hyperlipidemia are elderly individuals with multiple comorbidities, the introduction of even a single additional drug for asymptomatic conditions such as hyperlipidemia can drastically reduce treatment compliance due to their long medication history. Hence, researchers are trying to come up with a drug with a long duration of action requiring less frequent dosing without compromising compliance and improving the outcome. This led to the discovery of inclisiran, a "wonder drug" that utilizes small interference RNA and requires only twice-yearly administration to maintain patients' lipid levels at optimal levels. We conducted a systematic review by following standardized guidelines on the long-term efficacy and safety of the new drug, inclisiran, in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. We conducted an advanced search on PubMed using the MeSH strategy and then employed appropriate keywords to search other major databases, such as PubMed Central and Medline, using various inclusion and exclusion criteria, which yielded 94 articles from various databases. We narrowed down the search to 10 randomized controlled trials (ORION trials) after removing duplicates and screening for irrelevant titles for inclusion in the study. The ORION trials on inclisiran evaluated the drug's impact on various parameters, such as low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL), apolipoprotein B (apoB), and so on, while considering the safety aspects of the drug. All the trials indicate greater efficacy of inclisiran and long-term maintenance of the results achieved when compared to a placebo and showed a long dosing interval, thereby increasing treatment compliance. Additionally, as the drug's dose increased, we observed greater reductions in the mentioned parameters without a significant increase in the incidence of adverse events. According to the review's data analysis, inclisiran, with its greater efficacy, has the potential to replace conventional pharmacological therapy in the near future, with the best results achieved when combined with lifestyle modifications. However, a long-term assessment of the drug's efficacy and safety is required before implementing it in clinical practice to identify any potential safety concerns, particularly related to the administration of higher dosage over a longer period.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7759/cureus.69918

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inclisiran's twice-yearly dosing schedule may improve adherence, particularly in high-risk populations where sustained LDL-C reduction is critical.

    “Its twice-yearly dosing schedule may improve adherence, particularly in high-risk populations where sustained LDL-C reduction is critical.17”

    From Small Interfering RNA for LDL-Cholesterol Reduction (2026) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Review (page not provided) says twice-yearly dosing may improve adherence while maintaining substantial LDL-C reductions. It also reports sustained LDL-C reductions in patients with high cardiovascular risk factors, but does not establish that the adherence benefit is particularly pronounced in high-risk populations. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singareddy, S., Dhakal, S., Limbaña, T. A., Murugan, V., Nazmin, F., Garcia, J., & Khan, S.
Affiliations
California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Singareddy, Sanjana
Venue
Cureus
Published
2024-09-22
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
e69918-e69918
ISSN
2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402714716
Cited by
0
References
26
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
inclisiran, hypercholesterolemia, hyperlipidemia, siRNA, PCSK9 inhibition, LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, non-HDL cholesterol, medication adherence, drug safety, lifestyle modification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review