The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skillsamong Technical Education Students
Open accessAbstract
Higher order thinking skills is an important aspect in teaching and learning especially at higher education institutions.Thinking skills practices are part of the generic skills that should be infused in all technical subjects.Students with higher order thinking skills are able to learn, improve their performance and reduce their weaknesses.Hence, the purpose of this research was to identify the level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills among technical education students in the Faculty of Technical Education (FPTek), Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.A total of 158 students of FPTek were randomly selected as sample.A set of questionnaires adapted from Marzano Rubrics for Specific Task or Situations (1993) was used as research instrument.This is a quantitative research and the gathered data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software.The findings indicated that students perceived they have moderate level for investigation, experimental inquiry, comparing, deducing, constructing support, inducing and invention.However, decision making, problem solving, error analyzing, abstracting, analyzing perspectives and classifying are at low level.The Eta analysis indicated that there is a very low positive relationship between the level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills and gender, academic achivement as well as socio economic status.Besides that, the findings also showed that there is no statistically significant difference in gender, academic achivement and socio economic status on the level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills.However, there is significant difference in socio economic status on the level of decision making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
(1996) · Cited by 20,179
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203029053 · Cited by 20,105
How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1990) · Cited by 14,529
Introduction to research in education
Ary, D. (1972) · Cited by 7,699
Data Mining - Concepts and Techniques.
Perner, P. (2002) · Künstliche Intell. · Cited by 4,886
Research Methods in Education: An Introduction
Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (1980) · Cited by 1,459
Education and Learning to Think
(1987) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/1032 · Cited by 1,177
WaveCluster: A Multi-Resolution Clustering Approach for Very Large Spatial Databases
Sheikholeslami, G., Chatterjee, S., & Zhang, A. (1998) · Cited by 756
Defining higher order thinking
Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405849309543588 · Cited by 708
Cited by
Learning retention in mathematics over consecutive weeks: Impact of motivated forgetting
Valderama, J., & Oligo, J. (2021) · International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) · doi:10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21577 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. B., Yunos, J. B. M., Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. B., & Mohamad, M. M. B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Social Science and Humanity
- Publisher
- EJournal Publishing
- Published
- 2011
- Pages
- 121-125
- ISSN
- 2010-3646 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2334052488
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 6.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skillsamong Technical Education Students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7763/ijssh.2011.v1.20
- The paper
- Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. B., Yunos, J. B. M., Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. B., & Mohamad, M. M. B. (2011). The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skillsamong Technical Education Students. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijssh.2011.v1.20
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.