Cited by 55Electronic Health Records SystemsSocial Policies and Healthcare ReformHealth Services Management and Policy

Digital maturity: are we ready to use technology in the NHS?

Open access
Johnston, Daniel S·2017·Future Healthcare Journal

Abstract

Digital maturity assessments (DMAs) are a self-assessment mechanism for organisations. They can be effectively utilised to generate local digital roadmaps. In their simplest form, these allow organisations to understand their state of readiness to integrate digital technologies. This is achieved by assessing the capability and compatibility of their information systems to communicate or interface both within and across organisations. Through utilising and responding to the findings of DMAs, it is thought that the NHS will be better able to provide a patient-centred service to meet local needs within a national framework. It is this exchange and integration of information across health and social care systems that will drive innovation and transformation in the NHS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7861/futurehosp.4-3-189

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kane G , Palmer D , Phillips A , Kiron D , Buckley N . Aligning the organization for its digital future . Boston: MITSloan Management Review , 2016 .
  2. National Data Guardian for Health and Care . Review of data security, consent and opt-outs . Leeds : Office of the National Data Guardian , 2016 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnston, D. S.
Corresponding author
Johnston, Daniel S
Venue
Future Healthcare Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
189-192
ISSN
2514-6645 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2764071742
Cited by
55
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Future Healthcare Journal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Social Policies and Healthcare Reform
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
Keywords
digital maturity assessment, National Health Service, digital road maps, digital integration, information systems interoperability, integrated care, patient-centered care, healthcare innovation, organizational readiness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review