Cited by 6Digital Marketing and Social MediaConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Effects of Social Shopping Behavior from the Perspective of Collective Intelligence and Dissonance

Open access
Chiang, I Ping, Liang, Chia Chi, Yang, Wan Ling·2021·International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies

Abstract

People increasingly depend on the consumer experiences of a virtual community when making purchasing decisions. Potential consumers search for different types of electronic word of mouth when choosing a product to purchase. Social shopping has numerous advantages including community-based interaction and the sharing of consumer experiences; however, few studies have focused on measuring the effects of social shopping. This study established a conceptual framework for measuring the effects of social shopping activities, comprising the key elements of (1) the perceptions of social shopping activities, (2) collective intelligence and dissonance, and (3) the consequences of social shopping. This study collected 836 valid Internet user responses to an online survey. Partial least squares regression was used to analyze the relationship between the elements and to measure the effects in different social shopping stimuli.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7903/ijecs.1737

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Li, Zhen & Hou, Avus. (2019). Online Purchase Preference and Personal Characteristics: A Moderation Approach. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 10(1), 1-21.
  2. Juvan, E., & Dolnicar, S. (2014). The attitude-behavior gap in sustainable tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 48(8), 76-95.
  3. C. L. Hsu and Y. C. Liao, Exploring the linkages between perceived information accessibility and microblog stickiness: The moderating role of a sense of I-ping Chiang, Chia-Chi Liang and Wan-Ling Yang 117 community. Information & Management, 51(7), 833-844, 2014.
  4. J. Surowiecki and M. P. Silverman, The wisdom of crowds. American Journal of Physics, 75(2), 190-192, 2007.
  5. J. C. Sweeney, D. Hausknecht, and G. N. Soutar, Cognitive dissonance after purchase: A multidimensional scale. Psychology & Marketing, 17(5), 369-385, 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiang, I. P., Liang, C. C., & Yang, W. L.
Affiliations
National Taipei University (TW)
Venue
International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies
Published
2021-02-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
103
ISSN
2073-9729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3136518247
Cited by
6
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
social shopping, collective intelligence, cognitive dissonance, customer experience, online communities, electronic word of mouth, consumer behavior, purchase decision, consumer perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review