Cited by 1,106Climate Change and Environmental ImpactClimate Change Policy and EconomicsClimate variability and models

Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: The Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II

USGCRP·2018

Abstract

This report is an authoritative assessment of the science of climate change, with a focus on the United States. It represents the second of two volumes of the Fourth National Climate Assessment, mandated by the Global Change Research Act of 1990.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7930/nca4.2018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
USGCRP
Corresponding author
USGCRP
Published
2018
OpenAlex
W2904980512
Cited by
1,106
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 143 · 2022: 152 · 2021: 232 · 2020: 201 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
climate change impacts, climate risk, climate change adaptation, climate science, United States climate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review