Informed push distribution of contraceptives in Senegal reduces stockouts and improves quality of family planning services
Open accessAbstract
Contraceptive use in Senegal is among the lowest in the world and has barely increased over the past 5 years, from 10% of married women in 2005 to 12% in 2011. Contraceptive stockouts in public facilities, where 85% of women access family planning services, are common. In 2011, we conducted a supply chain study of 33 public-sector facilities in Pikine and Guediawaye districts of the Dakar region to understand the magnitude and root causes of stockouts. The study included stock audits, surveys with 156 consumers, and interviews with facility staff, managers, and other stakeholders. At the facility level, stockouts of injectables and implants occurred, on average, 43% and 83% of the year, respectively. At least 60% of stockouts occurred despite stock availability at the national level. Data from interviews revealed that the current "pull-based" distribution system was complex and inefficient. In order to reduce stockout rates to the commercial-sector standard of 2% or less, the Government of Senegal and the Senegal Urban Reproductive Health Initiative developed the informed push distribution model (IPM) and pilot-tested it in Pikine district between February 2012 and July 2012. IPM brings the source of supply (a delivery truck loaded with supplies) closer to the source of demand (clients in health facilities) and streamlines the steps in between. With a professional logistician managing stock and deliveries, the health facilities no longer need to place and pick up orders. Stockouts of contraceptive pills, injectables, implants, and intrauterine devices (IUDs) were completely eliminated at the 14 public health facilities in Pikine over the 6-month pilot phase. The government expanded IPM to all 140 public facilities in the Dakar region, and 6 months later stockout rates throughout the region dropped to less than 2%. National coverage of the IPM is expected by July 2015.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A programme in Senegal using an informed Push Model reduced stock outs for contraceptives.
“one programme in Senegal used an informed Push Model, in which projected demand dictates quantities of drug orders, to reduce stock outs for contraceptives,32”
From Do changes to supply chains and procurement processes yield cost savings and improve availability of pharmaceuticals, vaccines or health products? A systematic review of evidence from low-income and middle-income countries (2017) · cites this paper as [32]
The Conclusion says the informed push model was an effective solution to contraceptive stockouts in Senegal. The Strategy for Change says logisticians restocked facilities to maintain about two months of estimated supply needs, but it also says the model eliminated facility orders. Thus the stockout claim is supported, while the citing sentence’s description of projected demand dictating drug orders is not. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yadav, P. (2015) · Health Systems & Reform · doi:10.4161/23288604.2014.968005 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Seidman, G., & Atun, R. (2017) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000243 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Impact of vaccine stockouts on immunization coverage in Nigeria
Gooding, E., Spiliotopoulou, E., & Yadav, P. (2019) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.006 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Daff, B. M., Seck, C., Belkhayat, H., & Sutton, P.
- Affiliations
- Ministère de la Santé Publique et Action Sociale (SN)
- IntraHealth International (US)
- McKinsey & Company (United States) (US)
- Gates Foundation (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sutton, Perri
- Venue
- Global Health: Science and Practice
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 245-252
- ISSN
- 2169-575X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4168620
- OpenAlex
- W2166862845
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Global Health Science and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Keywords
- contraceptive stockouts, family planning services, injectable contraceptives, contraceptive implants, oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, Senegal, Dakar
- MeSH terms
- Contraceptive Agents, Female, Contraceptive Devices, Delivery of Health Care, Family Planning Services, Female, Health Facilities, Humans, Senegal, Public Sector
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review