The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Smart Governance: A Roadmap for Research and Practice
Abstract
In the early 21st century, societies and their governments around the world have been meeting unprecedented challenges, many of which surpass the capacities, capabilities, and reaches of their traditional institutions and their classical processes of governing. Among these challenges are the need for an accelerated transition of the global economy from its current fossil fuel basis to renewable energies, the so-called post-carbon era also known as the third industrial revolution, the containment and reduction of government spending and debt financing, the increasing rapidity of market changes, and the expanding lag of timely interventions via traditional lawmaking and government action. While upholding the proven principles of Western democracy, democratic self-governance in 21st century market economies apparently needs to develop new institutional formats and novel mechanisms for staying abreast with the systemic dynamics of a tightly interconnected global society. We claim that actionable and omnipresent information along with its underlying technologies are substantial prerequisites and backbones for developing models of smart (democratic) governance, which foster smart, open, and agile governmental institutions as well as stakeholder participation and collaboration on all levels and in all branches of the governing process. We present and discuss an agenda for research and practice, which advances the concept of smart, open, and participatory government of the 21st century.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness
Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6 · Cited by 5,476
Will the real smart city please stand up?: Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial?
Hollands, R. G. (2008) · City · doi:10.1080/13604810802479126 · Cited by 3,025
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 · Cited by 2,451
Cited by
Artificial intelligence: a survey on evolution, models, applications and future trends
Lu, Y. (2019) · Journal of Management Analytics · doi:10.1080/23270012.2019.1570365 · Cited by 641
Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review
Pereira, G. V., Parycek, P., Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-170067 · Cited by 466
Viale Pereira, G., Cunha, M. A., Lampoltshammer, T. J., Parycek, P., & Testa, M. G. (2017) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2017.1353946 · Cited by 378
Being smart: Emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Helbig, N., & Ojo, A. (2014) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.09.001 · Cited by 354
Granier, B., & Kudo, H. (2016) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-150367 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Venue
- iConference 2014 Proceedings
- Publisher
- iSchools
- Published
- 2014-03-01
- OpenAlex
- W1408972556
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 165.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Smart Governance: A Roadmap for Research and Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.9776/14060
- The paper
- Smart Governance: A Roadmap for Research and Practice. (2014). iConference 2014 Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.9776/14060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.