Cited by 47COVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Prevention and ImpactLegal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges

Characterizing early Canadian federal, provincial, territorial and municipal nonpharmaceutical interventions in response to COVID-19: a descriptive analysis

Open access
McCoy, Liam G., Smith, Jonathan, Anchuri, Kavya, Berry, Isha, Pineda, Joanna, Harish, Vinyas, Lam, Andrew T., Yi, Seung Eun +3 more·2020·CMAJ Open

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are the primary tools to mitigate early spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic; however, such policies are implemented variably at the federal, provincial or territorial, and municipal levels without centralized documentation. We describe the development of the comprehensive open Canadian Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention (CAN-NPI) data set, which identifies and classifies all NPIs implemented in regions across Canada in response to COVID-19, and provides an accompanying description of geographic and temporal heterogeneity. METHODS: We performed an environmental scan of government websites, news media and verified government social media accounts to identify NPIs implemented in Canada between Jan. 1 and Apr. 19, 2020. The CAN-NPI data set contains information about each intervention's timing, location, type, target population and alignment with a response stringency measure. We conducted descriptive analyses to characterize the temporal and geographic variation in early NPI implementation. RESULTS: We recorded 2517 NPIs grouped in 63 distinct categories during this period. The median date of NPI implementation in Canada was Mar. 24, 2020. Most jurisdictions heightened the stringency of their response following the World Health Organization's global pandemic declaration on Mar. 11, 2020. However, there was variation among provinces or territories in the timing and stringency of NPI implementation, with 8 out of 13 provinces or territories declaring a state of emergency by Mar. 18, and all by Mar. 22, 2020. INTERPRETATION: There was substantial geographic and temporal heterogeneity in NPI implementation across Canada, highlighting the importance of a subnational lens in evaluating the COVID-19 pandemic response. Our comprehensive open-access data set will enable researchers to conduct robust interjurisdictional analyses of NPI impact in curtailing COVID-19 transmission.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9778/cmajo.20200100

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because of public health policy guidelines during the pandemic in [Institution Location], patient encounters for non-COVID-related diseases decreased.

    “because of public health policy guidelines during the pandemic in [Institution Location] 47 , patient encounters for non-COVIDrelated diseases decreased 48 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCoy, L. G., Smith, J., Anchuri, K., Berry, I., Pineda, J., Harish, V., Lam, A. T., Yi, S. E., Hu, S., Rosella, L., & Fine, B.
Affiliations
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (CA)
Venue
CMAJ Open
Published
2020-07
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
E545-E553
ISSN
2291-0026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082955665
Cited by
47
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • CMAJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Toronto
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
Keywords
non-pharmaceutical interventions, COVID-19 pandemic response, state of emergency
MeSH terms
Physical Distancing, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Testing, Canada, Geography, Government, Humans, Time Factors, Infection Control, Policy, Pandemics, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review