Cited by 356Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and RegulationLaw, AI, and Intellectual Property

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The EU Approach to Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence

Open access

Smuha, Nathalie A.·2019·Computer Law Review International

DOI 10.9785/cri-2019-200402

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

As part of its European strategy for Artificial Intelligence (AI), and as a response to the increasing ethical questions raised by this technology, the European Commission established an independent High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG) in June 2018. The group was tasked to draft two deliverables: AI Ethics Guidelines and Policy and Investment Recommendations. Nine months later, its first deliverable was published, putting forward a comprehensive framework to achieve “Trustworthy AI” by offering ethical guidance to AI practitioners. This paper dives into the work carried out by the group, focusing in particular on its AI Ethics Guidelines. First, this paper clarifies the context that led to the creation of the AI HLEG and its mandate (I). Subsequently, it elaborates on the Guidelines’ aim and purpose (II), and analyses the Guidelines’ drafting process (III). Particular focus is given to the questions surrounding the respective role played by ethics and law in the AI governance landscape (IV), as well as some of the challenges that had to be overcome throughout the process (V). Finally, this paper places the Guidelines in an international context, and sets out the next steps (VI) ahead on the journey towards an appropriate governance framework for AI (VII).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9785/cri-2019-200402

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Still being checked.

Sorted by citations

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence
Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Confalonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., & Herrera, F. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 · Cited by 1,762
Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: A Review
Kaur, D., Uslu, S., Rittichier, K. J., & Durresi, A. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3491209 · Cited by 709
Survey of Explainable AI Techniques in Healthcare
Chaddad, A., Peng, J., Xu, J., & Bouridane, A. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23020634 · Cited by 591
Artificial intelligence governance: Ethical considerations and implications for social responsibility
Camilleri, M. A. (2024) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.13406 · Cited by 331
Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Models
Ferrara, E. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.03738 · Cited by 282
A Deep Gravity model for mobility flows generation
Simini, F., Barlacchi, G., Luca, M., & Pappalardo, L. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26752-4 · Cited by 309
Should ChatGPT be biased? Challenges and risks of bias in large language models
Ferrara, E. (2023) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v28i11.13346 · Cited by 282
Designing interpretable ML system to enhance trust in healthcare: A systematic review to proposed responsible clinician-AI-collaboration framework
Nasarian, E., Alizadehsani, R., Acharya, U. R., & Tsui, K.-L. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102412 · Cited by 207
Trustworthy ai: A computational perspective
Liu, H., Wang, Y., Fan, W., Liu, X., Li, Y., Jain, S., Liu, Y., Jain, A., & Tang, J. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3546872 · Cited by 261
Toward AI Governance: Identifying Best Practices and Potential Barriers and Outcomes
Papagiannidis, E., Enholm, I. M., Dremel, C., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2023) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10251-y · Cited by 191
Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI Interaction
Kim, S. S. Y., Watkins, E. A., Russakovsky, O., Fong, R., & Monroy-Hernández, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581001 · Cited by 233
Trust in artificial intelligence: From a foundational trust framework to emerging research opportunities
Lukyanenko, R., Maass, W., & Storey, V. C. (2022) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-022-00605-4 · Cited by 171
Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence for Designing Accessible Cultural Heritage
Pisoni, G., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Gijlers, H., & Tonolli, L. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11020870 · Cited by 183
Managing the race to the moon: Global policy and governance in Artificial Intelligence regulation—A contemporary overview and an analysis of socioeconomic consequences
Walter, Y. (2024) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-024-00109-4 · Cited by 108
Ethical considerations on artificial intelligence in dentistry: A framework and checklist
Rokhshad, R., Ducret, M., Chaurasia, A., Karteva, T., Radenković, M., Roganović, J., Hamdan, M. H., Mohammad‐Rahimi, H., Krois, J., Lahoud, P., et al. (2023) · Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104593 · Cited by 149
Trustworthy AI and Corporate Governance – The EU’s Ethics Guidelines For Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence from a Company Law Perspective
Hickman, E., & Petrin, M. (2020) · European Business Organization Law Review · doi:10.1007/s40804-021-00224-0 · Cited by 155
Interdisciplinary Research in Artificial Intelligence: Challenges and Opportunities
Kusters, R., Misevic, D., Berry, H., Cully, A., Cunff, Y. L., Dandoy, L., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Ficher, M., Grizou, J., Othmani, A., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2020.577974 · Cited by 161
AI Anxiety: a comprehensive analysis of psychological factors and interventions
Kim, J. J. H., Soh, J. Y., Kadkol, S., Solomon, I., Yeh, H., Srivatsa, A. V., Nahass, G. R., Choi, J. Y., Lee, S., Nyugen, T., et al. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00686-9 · Cited by 181
The Robot Privacy Paradox: Understanding How Privacy Concerns Shape Intentions to Use Social Robots
Lutz, C., & Tamò‐Larrieux, A. (2020) · Human-Machine Communication · doi:10.30658/hmc.1.6 · Cited by 142
AI integration in financial services: a systematic review of trends and regulatory challenges
Vukovic, D. B., Dekpo-Adza, S., & Matović, S. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-04850-8 · Cited by 216
Trust and Acceptance Challenges in the Adoption of AI Applications in Health Care: Quantitative Survey Analysis
Kauttonen, J., Rousi, R. A., & Alamäki, A. V. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/65567 · Cited by 133
Broadening the perspective for sustainable artificial intelligence: sustainability criteria and indicators for Artificial Intelligence systems
Rohde, F., Wagner, J., Meyer, A., Reinhard, P., Voß, M., Petschow, U., & Mollen, A. (2024) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101411 · Cited by 151
Digitally Assisted Mindfulness in Training Self-Regulation Skills for Sustainable Mental Health: A Systematic Review
Mitsea, E., Drigas, A. S., & Skianis, C. A. (2023) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs13121008 · Cited by 130
A Review on Human–Machine Trust Evaluation: Human-Centric and Machine-Centric Perspectives
Gebru, B., Zeleke, L., Blankson, D., Nabil, M., Nateghi, S., Homaifar, A., & Tunstel, E. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2022.3144956 · Cited by 101
AI and society: a virtue ethics approach
Farina, M., Zhdanov, P., Karimov, A. R., & Lavazza, A. (2022) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01545-5 · Cited by 112
A Review of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Transformed Health Ecosystems
Denecke, K., & Baudoin, C. R. (2022) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.795957 · Cited by 112
Towards Risk‐Free Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: Significance and Requirements
Alzubaidi, L., Al-Sabaawi, A., Bai, J., Dukhan, A., Alkenani, A. H., Al‐Asadi, A., Alwzwazy, H. A., Manoufali, M., Fadhel, M. A., Albahri, A. S., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1155/2023/4459198 · Cited by 116
Essential properties and explanation effectiveness of explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review
Jung, J., Lee, H., Jung, H., & Kim, H. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16110 · Cited by 87
A Survey of Trustworthy Federated Learning: Issues, Solutions, and Challenges
Zhang, Y., Zeng, D., Luo, J., Fu, X., Chen, G., Xu, Z., & King, I. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3678181 · Cited by 99
A Survey of Artificial Intelligence Challenges: Analyzing the Definitions, Relationships, and Evolutions
Saghiri, A. M., Vahidipour, S. M., Jabbarpour, M. R., Sookhak, M., & Forestiero, A. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12084054 · Cited by 122
A Critical Take on the Policy Recommendations of the EU High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence
Veale, M. (2020) · European Journal of Risk Regulation · doi:10.1017/err.2019.65 · Cited by 85
AI Ethics – Too Principled to Fail?
Mittelstadt, B. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3391293 · Cited by 82
AI Governance in Higher Education: Case Studies of Guidance at Big Ten Universities
Wu, C., Zhang, H., & Carroll, J. M. (2024) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi16100354 · Cited by 99
“These collective efforts underline the importance of a structured approach to AI governance, ensuring that AI technologies are developed and deployed in ways that uphold ethical standards and promote social good (Smuha 2019).”
Artificial Intelligence, Governance and Ethics: Global PerspectivesPreprint
Daly, A., Hagendorff, T., Li, H., Mann, M., Marda, V., Wagner, B., Wang, W., & Witteborn, S. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3414805 · Cited by 91
Beyond a Human Rights-Based Approach to AI Governance: Promise, Pitfalls, Plea
Smuha, N. A. (2020) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-020-00403-w · Cited by 78
Self-citation
Investing in AI for social good: an analysis of European national strategies
Foffano, F., Scantamburlo, T., & Cortés, À. (2022) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01445-8 · Cited by 86
AI literacy for ethical use of chatbot: Will students accept AI ethics?
Kajiwara, Y., & Kawabata, K. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100251 · Cited by 116
Evaluation of trustworthy artificial intelligent healthcare applications using multi-criteria decision-making approach
Alsalem, M. A., Alamoodi, A. H., Albahri, O. S., Albahri, A. S., Martínez, L. M., Yera, R., Duhaim, A. M., & Sharaf, I. M. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.123066 · Cited by 87
Artificial intelligence in the European Union
Ulnicane, I. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429262081-19 · Cited by 70
Explainable AI in 6G O-RAN: A Tutorial and Survey on Architecture, Use Cases, Challenges, and Future Research
Brik, B., Chergui, H., Zanzi, L., Devoti, F., Ksentini, A., Siddiqui, M. S., Costa‐Pérez, X., & Verikoukis, C. V. (2024) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2024.3510543 · Cited by 103
Trustworthy AI Development Guidelines for Human System Interaction
Wickramasinghe, C. S., Marino, D. L., Grandio, J., & Manic, M. (2020) · 2020 13th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI) · doi:10.1109/hsi49210.2020.9142644 · Cited by 71
Navigating the perils of artificial intelligence: a focused review on ChatGPT and responsible research and innovation
Polyportis, A., & Pahos, N. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-02464-6 · Cited by 64
ChatGPT’s Security Risks and Benefits: Offensive and Defensive Use-Cases, Mitigation Measures, and Future Implications
Charfeddine, M., Kammoun, H. M., Hamdaoui, B., & Guizani, M. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3367792 · Cited by 72
Establishing and evaluating trustworthy AI: overview and research challenges
Kowald, D., Scher, S., Pammer-Schindler, V., Müllner, P., Waxnegger, K., Demelius, L., Fessl, A., Toller, M., Mendoza Estrada, I. G., Šimić, I., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2024.1467222 · Cited by 59
AI Trustworthiness in Manufacturing: Challenges, Toolkits, and the Path to Industry 5.0
Ahangar, M. N., Farhat, Z. A., & Sivanathan, A. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25144357 · Cited by 73
Mitigating the adverse effects of AI with the European Union's artificial intelligence act: Hype or hope?
Wörsdörfer, M. (2023) · Global Business and Organizational Excellence · doi:10.1002/joe.22238 · Cited by 70
Requirements for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence – A Review
Kaur, D., Uslu, S., & Arjan Durresi, A. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57811-4_11 · Cited by 56
AI Ethics Issues in Real World: Evidence from AI Incident Database
Wei, M., & Zhou, Z. (2023) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2023.602 · Cited by 54
Considering a Unified Model of Artificial Intelligence Enhanced Social Work: A Systematic Review
Garkisch, M., & Goldkind, L. (2024) · Journal of Human Rights and Social Work · doi:10.1007/s41134-024-00326-y · Cited by 72
ETHICAL CONCERNS ASSOCIATED WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION: A CURSE OR A BLESSING?
Fülöp, M. T., Topor, D. I., Ionescu, C. A., Cifuentes‐Faura, J., & Măgdaș, N. (2023) · Journal of Business Economics and Management · doi:10.3846/jbem.2023.19251 · Cited by 67
Taxonomy of Machine Learning Safety: A Survey and Primer
Mohseni, S., Wang, H., Xiao, C., Yu, Z., Wang, Z., & Yadawa, J. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3551385 · Cited by 53
A Conceptual Framework for Applying Ethical Principles of AI to Medical Practice
Jha, D., Durak, G., Sharma, V., Keleş, E., Çiçek, V., Zhang, Z., Srivastava, A., Rauniyar, A., Hagos, D. H., Tomar, N. K., et al. (2025) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering12020180 · Cited by 97
Trajectories of AI policy in higher education: Interpretations, discourses, and enactments of students and teachers
Tsao, J. W. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100496 · Cited by 81
What do academics say about artificial intelligence ethics? An overview of the scholarship
Bakiner, O. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00182-4 · Cited by 29
Digital ethicswashing: a systematic review and a process-perception-outcome framework
Schultz, M. D., Conti, L. G., & Seele, P. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00430-9 · Cited by 47
Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection and its health technology assessment: A scoping review
Uwimana, A., Gnecco, G., & Riccaboni, M. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109391 · Cited by 51
The Ethics of AI in Games
Melhárt, D., Togelius, J., Mikkelsen, B., Holmgård, C., & Yannakakis, G. N. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2023.3276425 · Cited by 40
How empty is Trustworthy AI? A discourse analysis of the Ethics Guidelines of Trustworthy AI
Stamboliev, E., & Christiaens, T. (2024) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460171.2024.2315431 · Cited by 45
Evaluating Europe's push to enact AI regulations: how will this influence global norms?
Feldstein, S. (2023) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2023.2196068 · Cited by 40
“☑ Fairness Toolkits, A Checkbox Culture?” On the Factors that Fragment Developer Practices in Handling Algorithmic Harms
Balayn, A., Yurrita, M., Yang, J., & Gadiraju, U. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3600211.3604674 · Cited by 47
Affective Game Computing: A Survey
Yannakakis, G. N., & Melhárt, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2023.3315689 · Cited by 44
Convergence of CRISPR and artificial intelligence: A paradigm shift in biotechnology
Dara, M., Dianatpour, M., Azarpira, N., & Omidifar, N. (2024) · Human Gene · doi:10.1016/j.humgen.2024.201297 · Cited by 36
A validated framework for responsible AI in healthcare autonomous systems
Alelyani, T. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-25266-z · Cited by 52
A Trustworthy and Explainable Framework for Benchmarking Hybrid Deep Learning Models Based on Chest X-Ray Analysis in CAD Systems
Albahri, A. S., Jassim, M. M., Alzubaidi, L., Hamid, R. A., Ahmed, M. A., Al-Qaysi, Z. T., Albahri, O. S., Alamoodi, A. H., Alqaysi, M. E., Mohammed, T. J., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622024500019 · Cited by 34
How Do Ethical Factors Affect User Trust and Adoption Intentions of AI-Generated Content Tools? Evidence from a Risk-Trust Perspective
Yu, T., Tian, Y., Chen, Y., Huang, Y., Pan, Y., & Jang, W. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13060461 · Cited by 47
Artificial Intelligence Governance and Ethics : Global Perspectives
Daly, A., Hagendorff, T., Hui, L., Mann, M., Marda, V., Wagner, B., Wang, W., & Witteborn, S. (2019) · Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) · Cited by 33
Digital Sovereignty, Digital Expansionism, and the Prospects for Global AI Governance
Roberts, H., Hine, E., & Floridi, L. (2023) · Philosophical studies series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-41566-1_4 · Cited by 32
Exploring transition states of protein conformational changes via out-of-distribution detection in the hyperspherical latent space
Liu, B., Boysen, J. G., Unarta, I. C., Du, X., Li, Y., & Huang, X. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55228-4 · Cited by 37
Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Framework for Systematic Literature Reviews
Dinh, T. L., Le, T. D., Uwizeyemungu, S., & Pelletier, C. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16030240 · Cited by 57
Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in BRICS and the European Union
Cyman, D., Gromova, E., & Juchnevicius, E. (2021) · BRICS Law Journal · doi:10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-1-86-115 · Cited by 25
An Exploratory Investigation of Chatbot Applications in Anxiety Management: A Focus on Personalized Interventions
Manole, A., Cârciumaru, R., Brînzaș, R., & Manole, F. (2024) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16010011 · Cited by 37
A Framework for Global Cooperation on Artificial Intelligence and Its Governance
Ala-Pietilä, P., & Smuha, N. A. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-69128-8_15 · Cited by 36
Self-citation
Teaching religious studies with artificial intelligence: A qualitative analysis of Lesotho secondary schools teachers’ perceptions
Kurata, L., Ayanwale, M. A., Molefi, R. R., & Sanni, T. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100417 · Cited by 37
Ethical use of artificial intelligence to prevent sudden cardiac death: an interview study of patient perspectives
Maris, M. T., Koçar, A., Willems, D. L., Pols, J. J., Tan, H. L., Lindinger, G. L., & Bak, M. (2024) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-024-01042-y · Cited by 30
A Survey on Trusted Distributed Artificial Intelligence
Ağca, M. A., Faye, S., & Khadraoui, D. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3176385 · Cited by 30
The Role of Human-Centered AI in User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization—Models, Frameworks, and Paradigms
Torkamaan, H., Tahaei, M., Buijsman, S., Xiao, Z., Wilkinson, D., & Knijnenburg, B. P. (2024) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55109-3_2 · Cited by 28
Edge AI for Smart Cities: Foundations, Challenges, and Opportunities
Velaga, K. S., Guo, Y., & Yu, W. (2025) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities8060211 · Cited by 38
A Trustworthy Human–Machine framework for collective decision making in Food–Energy–Water management: The role of trust sensitivity
Uslu, S., Kaur, D., Rivera, S. J., Arjan Durresi, A., Babbar‐Sebens, M., & Tilt, J. H. (2020) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106683 · Cited by 26
A Review of Agentic AI in Cybersecurity: Cognitive Autonomy, Ethical Governance, and Quantum-Resilient Defense
ADABARA, I., Olaniyi Sadiq, B., Nuhu Shuaibu, A., Ibarahim Danjuma, Y., & Venkateswarlu, M. (2025) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.169337.1 · Cited by 34
Toward Learning Trustworthily from Data Combining Privacy, Fairness, and Explainability: An Application to Face Recognition
Franco, D., Oneto, L., Navarin, N., & Anguita, D. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23081047 · Cited by 28
Addressing the clinical unmet needs in primary Sjögren’s Syndrome through the sharing, harmonization and federated analysis of 21 European cohorts
Pezoulas, V. C., Goules, A. V., Kalatzis, F., Chatzis, L. G., Kourou, K. D., Venetsanopoulou, A. I., Exarchos, T. P., Gandolfo, S., Votis, K., Zampeli, E., et al. (2022) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2022.01.002 · Cited by 25
Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning by Rare Embeddings and Gradient Ensembling
Yoo, K., & Kwak, N. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.6 · Cited by 31
Reducing the incidence of biased algorithmic decisions through feature importance transparency: an empirical study
Ebrahimi, S., Abdelhalim, E., Hassanein, K., & Head, M. M. (2024) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2024.2395531 · Cited by 32
Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Education: Pitfalls and PathwaysPreprint
Smuha, N. A. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3742421 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Explainable AI-Driven Quality and Condition Monitoring in Smart Manufacturing
Ahangar, M. N., Farhat, Z. A., Sivanathan, A., Ketheesram, N., & Kaur, S. (2026) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s26030911 · Cited by 30
Adversarial radiomics: the rising of potential risks in medical imaging from adversarial learning
Barucci, A., & Neri, E. (2020) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-020-04879-8 · Cited by 28
Interacting with Machines: Can an Artificially Intelligent Agent Be a Partner?
Schmidt, P., & Loidolt, S. (2023) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-023-00656-1 · Cited by 30
Human-centered AI: advancing ethical, transparent, and context-aware systems for sustainable development
Nizamani, M. M., Zhang, H.-L., & Lai, Z. (2025) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103121 · Cited by 25
Designing and Evaluating User Experience of an AI-Based Defense System
Park, S., Kim, H. K., Park, J., & Lee, Y. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3329257 · Cited by 22
Four shades of AI regulation
Benbouzid, B., Meneceur, Y., Smuha, N. A., & Carey-Libbrecht, L. (2022) · Réseaux · doi:10.3917/res.232.0029 · Cited by 19
Self-citation
Perceptron Theory Can Predict the Accuracy of Neural Networks
Kleyko, D. V., Rosato, A., Frady, E. P., Panella, M., & Sommer, F. T. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2023.3237381 · Cited by 29
AI ethics and ordoliberalism 2.0: towards a ‘Digital Bill of Rights’
Wörsdörfer, M. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00367-5 · Cited by 20
Towards Trustworthy AI-Empowered Real-Time Bidding for Online Advertisement Auctioning
Tang, X., & Yu, H. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3701741 · Cited by 20
Toward an integrated framework for developing European 6G innovation
Ahokangas, P., Gisca, O., Matinmikko‐Blue, M., Yrjölä, S., & Gordon, J. (2023) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102641 · Cited by 18
A Review of Ethical Considerations in Using Artificial Intelligence in E-Learning
Homayouni, L., Hejazi, Y., & Zarifsanaiey, N. (2024) · International and National Conference on E-Learning and E-Teaching (ICeLeT) · doi:10.1109/icelet62507.2024.10493100 · Cited by 19
Survey of EU ethical guidelines for commercial AI: case studies in financial services
Huang, J. Y., Gupta, A., & Youn, M. Y. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00048-1 · Cited by 11
Trustworthy Acceptance: A New Metric for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence Used in Decision Making in Food–Energy–Water Sectors
Uslu, S., Kaur, D., Rivera, S. J., Arjan Durresi, A., Durrësi, M., & Babbar‐Sebens, M. (2021) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75100-5_19 · Cited by 18
Risk and Exposure of XAI in Persuasion and Argumentation: The case of Manipulation
Carli, R., Najjar, A., & Calvaresi, D. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15565-9_13 · Cited by 18
Beyond Code and Algorithms: Navigating Ethical Complexities in Artificial Intelligence
Ľuptáková, I. D., Pospı́chal, J., & Huraj, L. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54813-0_30 · Cited by 17
Navigating the AI regulatory landscape: Balancing innovation, ethics, and global governance
Perboli, G., Nadia, S., & Pratali, S. (2025) · Economic and Political Studies · doi:10.1080/20954816.2025.2569584 · Cited by 29

Authors: Smuha, N. A.
Corresponding author: Smuha, Nathalie A.
ORCID: Smuha, Nathalie A.
Venue: Computer Law Review International
Publisher: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt
Published: 2019-08-01
Volume: 20
Issue: 4
Pages: 97-106
ISSN: 1610-7608 (ISSN-L)
2194-4164
DOI: 10.9785/cri-2019-200402
OpenAlex: W2968511602
Cited by: 356
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 35 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
FWCI: 29.30
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
lirias.kuleuven.be
Licence: other-oa
Locations: Computer Law Review International (publishedVersion)
Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders: European Commission
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KU Leuven
Vlaamse regering
Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology
Topics: Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Keywords: trustworthy AI, AI ethics guidelines, AI governance, drafting process, European Commission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The EU Approach to Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks