Toward AI Governance: Identifying Best Practices and Potential Barriers and Outcomes
Open accessAbstract
In recent years artificial intelligence (AI) has been seen as a technology with tremendous potential for enabling companies to gain an operational and competitive advantage. However, despite the use of AI, businesses continue to face challenges and are unable to immediately realize performance gains. Furthermore, firms need to introduce robust AI systems and mitigate AI risks, which emphasizes the importance of creating suitable AI governance practices. This study, explores how AI governance is applied to promote the development of robust AI applications that do not introduce negative effects, based on a comparative case analysis of three firms in the energy sector. The study illustrates which practices are placed to produce knowledge that assists with decision making while at the same time overcoming barriers with recommended actions leading to desired outcomes. The study contributes by exploring the main dimensions relevant to AI’s governance in organizations and by uncovering the practices that underpin them.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This comparative case study of three Norwegian energy firms examines how AI governance practices help organizations develop robust AI applications while mitigating risks. It identifies procedural, relational, and structural governance practices, the barriers they address, and outcomes such as cost reduction, flexibility, robustness, and competitive advantage.
Key findings
- AI governance is organized around procedural, relational, and structural practices: ML pipelines, dashboards, data quality at source, domain experts leading projects, AI education for employees, internal AI teams, unified tools, and weak AI applications focused on specific tasks.
- Firms faced barriers including difficult AI cloud development, AI development differing from traditional software, lack of data or domain knowledge, employee AI-phobia and misunderstanding of AI capabilities, legal constraints/GDPR, and hard-to-predict costs and effort. Recommended actions included offline recommendation systems, standardized executable components, shared libraries, domain experts leading, AI training, clear data management roles, KPIs, and internal AI teams.
- Outcomes reported across cases were reducing maintenance costs, increasing flexibility and robustness, improving confidence in results, and gaining competitive advantage. One respondent reported maintenance costs falling from around two million a year to around ten thousand a year; another cited an estimated 20–30% reduction in maintenance costs based on big data.
- The proposed model links enablers such as existing AI culture and architecture, and inhibitors such as legal constraints, domain challenges, high development costs, and AI-phobia, to desired outcomes including competitive advantage, cost reduction, and dependable AI systems.
Methods
- Exploratory comparative multi-case study of three Norwegian energy firms (Company A: 200 employees, 180 million dollars turnover; Company B: 530 employees, 260 million dollars; Company C: 100 employees, 23 million dollars).
- Data collection included 15 semi-structured interviews with business and IT respondents who had key positions, good understanding of AI technologies, and at least one year in their current position and five years relative experience; interviews averaged 55 min, ranged from 25 to 90 min, were conducted via Zoom, recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Secondary data included annual reports, vision and firm structure documents, and internal documents.
- Analysis used narrative analysis, NVivo, open and axial coding, and cross-case analysis. Initial 200 descriptive codes were reduced to 95 after iteration; three iterations of data analysis were conducted, with independent coding by three authors and triangulation across sources.
Limitations
- Stated: the data came from companies that do not require extensive use of sensitive data, so there may be bias or an incomplete picture of challenges around relevant practices; data collection was a snapshot in time and may not reflect the complete breadth of practices; all cases are from the same sector, so generalizability may be an issue.
- Evident: the study is qualitative and based on three firms and 15 interviews, so findings are not statistically generalizable; the paper itself calls for future research with firms from different sectors and for positivist testing of antecedents and effects.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 31 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Standardization and unification of AI technologies was an issue in Company A because the team consisted of people from different backgrounds and skills, creating obstacles in AI development.
“Standardization and unification of AI technologies was an issue because the team is consisted of people from different backgrounds and with different skills creating obstacles in AI development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Findingreasoning
Data privacy (GDPR) is not a genuine concern in the cases except the last case, because their data mainly consists of environmental data that anyone could access or buy.
“Thirdly, data privacy (GDPR) is not a genuine concern (expect in the last case) since their data mainly consists of environmental data that anyone could access or buy”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Findingown data
AI was found to be most helpful for increasing flexibility and robustness of the development process.
“Among the outcomes of the study, AI was found to be most helpful for (1) reducing maintenance costs, (2) increasing flexibility and robustness of the development process, (3) improving confidence in the results and final products, and (4) gaining a competitive edge over the competition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
AI was found to be most helpful for reducing maintenance costs.
“Among the outcomes of the study, AI was found to be most helpful for (1) reducing maintenance costs, (2) increasing flexibility and robustness of the development process, (3) improving confidence in the results and final products, and (4) gaining a competitive edge over the competition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The evaluation of ML pipelines was a continuous process that took place at different points of the pipeline for ensuring robustness and quality.
“The evaluation of ML pipelines was a continuous process that took place at different points of the pipeline for ensuring robustness and quality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
- Findingown data
Employees in the case firms saw AI and automation as a way of losing their status and position.
“Employees did not trust the outcomes, sometimes they described the recommendations as naive, and most importantly, employees saw AI and automation as a way of losing their status and position.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
AI strategy for current or feature development projects seems to be the centre for top managers as they need to design products that focus on specific needs while adding business value.
“As for the structural practices, AI strategy for current or feature development projects seems to be the centre for top managers as they need to design products that focus on specific needs, while adding business value.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
- Findingown data
All firms attempted to fix potential issues in data sources through data collection corrections and use of APIs, instead of extending their cleaning process.
“All firms attempted to fix potential issues in the data sources, through data collection corrections and the use of APIs, instead of extending their cleaning process”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
- Findingreasoning
The outcomes were similar in all the case firms.
“The outcomes were similar in all cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In Company C, data roles and data management were not always in the spotlight as almost all employees could access data when the company was small.
“Nevertheless, data roles and data management were not always in the spotlight as almost all employees could access data since the company’s size was small.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Findingown data
Most employees who started using AI as an assistant in their decision-making processes very often misunderstood AI's ability to predict certain patterns, especially when AI models were updated.
“AI teams explained what AI is all about and how it works because most employees who started using AI as assistant in their decision-making processes misunderstood very often AI’s ability to predict certain patterns (especially true when AI models were updated)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The direct threat employees experienced from AI and automation was handled by many workshops and internal meetings.
“This direct threat, as they experienced it, was handled by many workshops and internal meetings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The obstacles of AI deployment span various levels of analysis, from the personal (fear of AI and reluctance of employees to adopt it) to the organizational (organizational directives on how to comply with laws and regulations).
“In addition, they span various levels of analysis, from the personal, such as fear of AI and reluctance of employees to adopt it, to organizational-level ones, such as organizational directives on how to comply with laws and regulations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
To ensure trustworthiness and confidence in its services, Company C implemented ways for explaining AI decisions (XAI) that allow customer service employees to communicate efficiently with customer requests involving AI decisions or suggestions.
“To ensure trustworthiness and confidence in their provided services, the team has implemented ways for explaining AI decisions (XAI) which allow customer service employees to communicate efficiently with customer requests that involved AI decisions or AI suggestions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Findingown data
Establishing an AI culture inside the firm through extensive training was not an easy process, especially in the first two case companies.
“Lastly, establishing an AI culture inside the firm through extensive training was not an easy process, especially true for the two first cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The need to unify and standardize the set of used tools was more than a necessity in the case firms.
“The need to unify and standardize the set of used tools was more than a necessity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Company C adopted AI practices to build capabilities to create customized applications for each client.
“Hence, they decided to adopt AI practices to build the necessary capabilities to create customized applications for each client.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Findingreasoning
One of the main enablers for AI governance is unification in the choice of technologies and infrastructure.
“One of the main enablers for AI governance is unification in the choice of technologies and infrastructure because there are different tools for developing AI products.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Flexibility and robustness were products of the development process, as the case firms' AI systems have to be able to adapt and estimate market trends.
“Flexibility and robustness were products of the development process as their AI systems have to be able to adapt and estimate market trends.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
For all projects, data governance, data quality, and data security are common elements to ensure quality and security.
“For all projects, data governance, data quality and data security are common elements to ensure quality and security.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
- Findingreasoning
Company B's data administrator process is straightforward because there are only two roles primarily: one administrator who can perform all actions and one reader who can only read specific data.
“Last but not least, the data administrator is a straightforward process because there are only two roles primarily, one administrator who can perform all actions (e.g., write and read), and one reader who can only read specific data as part of their work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Findingown data
Company A had legacy code written in different programming languages, which made compatibility among applications an issue.
“For example, Company A had legacy code written in different programming languages making compatibility among applications an issue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Company B faced a challenge from employees who refused to use new technologies because they did not trust the results or opposed the change.
“Another challenge that the developers faced came from employees who refused to use the new technologies as they did not trust the results or even oppose the change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Findingnone given
The outcomes of the pipelines were AI products considered weak AI, executing singular tasks or providing suggestions for decision making (AI assistants).
“The outcomes of the pipelines were AI products that are considered to be weak AI, executing singular tasks or providing with suggestions for decision making (AI assistants).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
- Findingown data
Managers had to separate nice-to-have features requested by clients or employees to avoid delaying the project and skyrocketing development costs leading to project failure.
“Managers had to separate the nice to have features that were often requested by either clients or employees. Otherwise, these requests could delay considerably the project and skyrocket the cost of development leading the project’s failure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
- Findingown data
The study identified specific procedural, structural and relational components that are necessary for achieving positive outcomes from AI governance.
“this study identified specific procedural, structural and relational components that are necessary for achieving this.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Not all companies have managed to build AI solutions that have had significant organizational effects and resulted in added business value.
- Study design and conductnone given
Confirmability was achieved by conducting interviews with different employees in the same firm who have key positions and belong to the same or different departments.
“Finally, confirmability was achieved by conducting interviews with different employees in the same firm who have key positions and belong to the same or different departments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Allowing the development of AI applications that are not under any supervision could be harmful.
“Allowing the development of AI applications that are not under any supervision could be harmful (Chatterjee et al., 2020; Mishra & Pani, 2020);”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chatterjee et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mishra & Pani, 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The main challenge for adopting AI in organizational operations is that AI technologies vary in scope and complexity, hindering familiarity, especially for non-technical employees.
“The main challenge for adopting AI in organizational operations is that AI technologies vary in scope and complexity, hindering familiarity, especially for non-technical employees (Holmstrom, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holmstrom, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Businesses adopting AI face new challenges, such as reducing the gap between intent and action.
“As businesses adopt Artificial Intelligence (AI), they are faced with new value propositions, but they also have to deal with new challenges, such as reducing the gap between intent and action(Amershi et al., 2019; Enholm et al., 2021; Mishra & Pani, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Amershi et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Enholm et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mishra & Pani, 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
ML technologies have the ability to bring societal inequalities into organizational processes.
“But these technologies also have the ability to bring societal inequalities into organizational processes (Teodorescu et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Teodorescu et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Triangulation across multiple sources and methods through the convergence of information was used to ensure validity in findings.
“To ensure validity in our findings, we used triangulation across multiple sources and methods through the convergence of information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
To make the ultimate decision, a business owner or manager must employ intuition to reconcile the choices provided by AI.
“To make the ultimate decision, a business owner or manager must employ intuition to reconcile the choices provided by AI (Kar & Kushwaha, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kar & Kushwaha, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI solutions can always provide a variety of responses and probabilities for each of the difficult management alternatives a business owner must choose among.
“When it comes to difficult management responsibilities that a business owner must do, AI solutions can always provide a variety of responses and probabilities for each of these alternatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kar & Kushwaha, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI lacks the ability to make decisions in specific contexts.
“However, AI lacks the ability to make decisions in specific contexts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kar & Kushwaha, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI has the potential to foster a digital innovation process by developing new and evidence-based approaches for data collection.
“Also, AI has the potential to foster a digital innovation process by developing new and evidence-based approaches for data collection (Mariani & Nambisan, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mariani & Nambisan, 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI enables organizations to modify particular parameters to appeal to a wider audience when content is released online.
“First, it enables organizations to modify particular parameters to appeal to a wider audience when content is released online”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Trocin et al., 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
All cases are from the same sector, so generalizability could be an issue.
“Lastly, all cases are from the same sector. Hence, generalizability could be an issue that should be taken into consideration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There is a form of ephemerality in AI governance which places an increased focus on establishing processes, mechanisms, and structures to ensure it functions as required and aligns with the organization's goals.
“Thus, there is a form of ephemerality which places an increased focus on establishing processes, mechanisms, and structures to ensure that it is functioning as required and that it aligns well with the goals of the organization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
AI can foster digital process and service innovation.
“where AI can foster digital process and service innovation as companies did in this study”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Trocin et al., 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 75
- May combine two claims. 82
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAI was found to be most helpful for improving confidence in the results and final products.
“Among the outcomes of the study, AI was found to be most helpful for (1) reducing maintenance costs, (2) increasing flexibility and robustness of the development process, (3) improving confidence in the results and final products, and (4) gaining a competitive edge over the competition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenLegal regulations restrict the cases to using AI in specific areas, for instance they are not allowed to speculate on prices.
“while legal regulations restrict them to using AI in specific areas, for instance they are not allowed to speculate on prices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCompany A collected necessary data through vendors, enabling comparison of data and ensuring high quality outcomes for trained models.
“The necessary data was collected through vendors, so it was possible to compare data and ensure high quality outcomes for the trained models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataDomain experts participated in evaluation in Company A to provide insights and feedback to make model outputs reliable and trustworthy.
“Also, domain experts participated in the evaluation so they can provide their insights and feedback to make the model outputs reliable and trustworthy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataControl of key domain knowledge was one of Company A's main concerns; it did not want to give away domain knowledge to external partners because they could build and sell similar AI products to rivals.
“Control of key domain knowledge was one of the main concerns for firm. Company A did not want to give away domain knowledge to external partners, who offer specialized AI products, since they could build and sell similar AI products to their rivals”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompany A's AI team brought value by forecasting energy consumption, assisting in decision-making for end-users, and automating repetitive tasks.
“The AI team brought value to the firm by forecasting energy consumption, assisting in decision-making for the end-users and automating repetitive tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompany A replaced Excel file data exchange with APIs because Excel files were not secure and could not scale up.
“In the beginning, data was exchanged through Excel files. These files were not secure, and at the same time they realized that they could not scale up, so APIs were used to replace Excel files.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe set-up goals of the cases mainly concern reducing costs and forecasting energy demands.
“Lastly, the set-up goals mainly concern reducing costs and forecasting energy demands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAll cases operate in the same industry and have overlapping areas of operation.
“Firstly, all the cases operate in the same industry and have overlapping areas of operation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAs a result of the AI team's work, Company A's performance was boosted and maintenance costs were down.
“As a result, performance was boosted and maintenance costs were down.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompany A developed intelligence that runs on top of cloud services to achieve automation and flexibility while avoiding developing the entire software from scratch.
“The development team aimed for automation and flexibility but they did not want to develop the entire software from scratch since it would be time-consuming to do everything. At the same time, they did not prefer to use software of other companies, so they decided to develop the intelligence that runs on top of cloud services”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompany A created ML pipelines in the cloud to govern data cleaning and model evaluation, making it easier to oversee the overall process and apply quantifiable metrics on ML results.
“To govern the process of data cleaning and model evaluation, ML pipelines were created in the cloud. This made it easier to oversee the overall process and apply quantifiable metrics on the ML results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompany A maintained local ML pipelines to support decision-making in case of failure, ensuring a reliable and robust system that could always generate output.
“In case of failure, local systems (ML pipelines) were ready to support decision-making, ensuring a reliable and robust system that could always generate output and assists employees with their everyday tasks”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe selected firms share the perspective that AI must be developed, expanded and adopted in the following years as it will be crucial for gaining or maintaining competitive advantage.
“The most common perspective among the selected firms is that AI must be developed, expanded and adopted in the following years as it will be crucial for gaining or maintaining their competitive advantage over rivals or new companies entering the frame and seeking a piece of the pie.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenDevelopment best practices were followed in all cases, such as the use of Git, documentation, and containerization platforms like Docker.
“Secondly, development best practices were followed such as the use of Git, documentation and containerization platforms like Docker.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAI contributes to the reduction of predictive maintenance costs in Company A, where maintenance is challenging due to harsh Norwegian weather, especially during winter.
“AI contributes to the reduction of predictive maintenance costs, which is challenging in Norway due to its harsh weather conditions, especially during winter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompany A restricted data access to intranet to increase security, but did not define clear data management roles, making the data request process time-consuming.
“To increase security, data access was only possible through intranet, but the company did not define clear data management roles, making the data request process time consuming”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompany A prioritized prediction safety over profitability, emphasizing reducing errors rather than increasing profit margins.
“Rather than increase profit margins, the model outputs emphasize reducing errors, because Company A places higher priority on prediction safety instead of profitability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAI was found to be most helpful for gaining a competitive edge over the competition.
“Among the outcomes of the study, AI was found to be most helpful for (1) reducing maintenance costs, (2) increasing flexibility and robustness of the development process, (3) improving confidence in the results and final products, and (4) gaining a competitive edge over the competition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompany A's team decided through internal workshops to unify used tools (e.g., programming languages, databases) and create a shared vocabulary through collaborative wiki pages.
“The team decided through internal workshops to unify the used tools (e.g., programming languages, databases) while creating a shared vocabulary through collaborative wiki pages”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCompany B gathered data internally and externally from various vendors to verify and ensure data quality for AI models.
“To build the AI capabilities data were gathered internally and externally from various vendors as it needed to verify and ensure the quality of the data since it is crucial for the AI models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompany C created procedures covering any AI behavior change and when timeline changes are allowed to be published in production to avoid AI failures.
“To ensure robustness, the development team has created procedures that covers extensively any AI behavior change and when the timeline that these changes are allowed to be published, for example, not before a big event, in production to avoid AI failures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe obstacles identified during the process of deploying AI are observable at different phases and concern different job roles.
“we find that the obstacles that are identified during the process of deploying AI are observable at different phases and concern different job roles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataReducing maintenance costs and forecasting energy consumption were the top priorities in the case firms, since most of the business value comes from these two outcomes.
“The need for reducing maintenance costs and forecasting energy consumption were the top priorities since most of the business value come from these two outcomes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataRadical changes in processes and operations made AI training for end-users more than necessary in Company A.
“Due to radical changes in processes and operations AI training for end-users was more than necessary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataWith help of AI developers, domain experts built notification systems by declaring which notifications should be sent via email and which displayed in dashboards.
“Also, with the help of AI developers they built notifications systems, by declaring which notifications should be sent via email and which should be displayed in dashboards”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBy including notification systems, error detection, and decision-making tools, firms measure the credibility of their systems and evaluate performance through KPIs.
“In addition, intelligence systems should include notification systems, error detection and decision-making tools. By doing so, firms measure the credibility of their systems and evaluate the performance gained through KPIs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompany A tested models against real-time datasets after deployment, enabling adjustments, better understanding of data, and improved overall quality of the system.
“Another way to ensure robust outcomes after deployment was to test the models against real-time datasets. Through This, they were able to make adjustments to the models, obtain a better understanding of the data, and improve the overall quality of the system”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataDomain experts managed projects in Company A because their knowledge and expertise were needed at each step of development; their insights could determine which data were needed for ML models.
“Domain experts manage the projects as their knowledge and expertise are needed at each step of the development phase. For example, their insights could determine, which data should be needed for the machine learning models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn all cases, domain experts were involved in all development phases because their domain knowledge was crucial to project success and they led projects as project managers.
“In all cases, domain experts were involved in all development phases for two reasons. Firstly, their domain knowledge was crucial to the success of the project, and secondly, they led the projects as project managers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCompany B developed AI models in conjunction with domain experts.
“they have begun developing AI models in conjunction with domain experts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIt is common in AI projects to reuse parts of one pipeline for another, which reduces overall development time considerably.
“It is common in AI projects to reuse parts of one pipeline for another, which reduces the overall development time considerably.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCompany B reduced a cost of around two million a year to around ten thousand a year.
“We had a cost of around two million a year and it has been reduced to around ten thousand a year, almost nothing”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompany B kept system complexity low to prevent high development costs while introducing end-users to AI capabilities to enable trust and adoption.
“The complexity of the system was kept low to prevent high development costs while the end-users were introduced to AI capabilities to enable them to trust and adopt AI in their daily work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompany B adopted Docker from the start to package applications into containers, and these standardized executable components boosted flexibility.
“By contrast, a containerization platform like Docker was adopted from the start to let developers to package applications into containers. Thus, these standardized executable components boosted flexibility and the cloud services were put aside.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCompany C has AI unit tests in place to ensure system outputs are reliable.
“AI unit tests are also in place to ensure the system's outputs are reliable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataData management practices in the cases mostly consider securing data, using secure databases and intranet access, and creating a few roles for data access, usually two types: developers with full access and end-users with access to specific data.
“Data management practices consider mostly securing data, using secure databases and intranet access, and creating a few roles for data access, where usually there are two types of roles, (1) developers with full access and (2) end-users with access to specific data”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCompany C never experienced problems related to AI fear because all employees have a good understanding of what AI can offer and how it helps them.
“It is worth mentioning that Company C never experienced any problems related to AI fear since all employees have a good understanding of what AI can offer and how it helps them in their everyday lives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataManagers need to allocate the right resources and plan precisely because costs and timelines for AI projects do not follow the usual software projects.
“Also, managers need to allocate the right resources and plan precisely as the costs and timelines for AI projects do not follow the usual software projects”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningEnd-users had to follow AI suggestions intuitively and use their domain knowledge to fill gaps that AI was not capable of.
“Nevertheless, the end-users had to follow the AI suggestions intuitively and use their domain knowledge to fill gaps that AI was not capable of.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll firms aimed to build new capabilities using external software; algorithms, trading strategies, and ML pipelines are developed by internal AI teams using platforms from third partners, keeping domain knowledge in house.
“As far as the procedural practices are concerned, all firms aimed to build new capabilities using external software. Algorithms, trading strategies and machine learning pipelines are developed by the internal AI teams, using platforms from third partners, keeping domain knowledge in house.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCompany B uses AI as a tool for prediction for identifying market opportunities and reducing maintenance costs.
“To sum up, company B uses AI as a tool for prediction for identifying market opportunities and reducing maintenance costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenDespite use of ML applications with neural networks, all Company B's applications are considered weak AI (limited to a narrow task).
“Despite the use of ML applications with neural networks, all the applications are considered to be weak AI (AI that is limited to a narrow task).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn Company B, developers spent many hours explaining what a statistical output is, how the model makes predictions, and what is possible and not doable; training lasted for months.
“the developers spent many hours explaining what a statistical output is and how the model actually make predictions. Furthermore, they elaborated on what is possible and what is not doable, which took a long time for the end-users to digest all these new information and the training process lasted for months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenWhen people start using the applications in Company B, they misunderstand AI capabilities; end-users had unrealistic expectations of what the model could or should predict.
“Nevertheless, when people start using the applications, they misunderstand the AI capabilities. End-users had unrealistic expectations of what the model could or should predict”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCompany C formed a dedicated team to deal with privacy issues by introducing procedures during data transformation and storage phases.
“As previously mentioned, the firm uses private data, so a dedicated team was formed to deal with privacy issues by introducing procedures during the data transformation and data storage phases”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenPipelines provide confidence in the quality of the end result as the final product is robust, easily maintainable, and extendable for new features.
“At the same time, pipelines provide confidence in the quality of the end result as the final product is robust, easily maintainable and extendable for new features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIt is expensive to add many features and takes a lot of time to develop in Company B.
“Nevertheless, it is expensive to add many features and takes a lot of time to develop.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataReducing maintenance costs and errors, and creating flexible systems that can scale, were top priorities for Company B.
“Reducing maintenance costs and errors, as well as creating flexible systems that can scale, were all top priorities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataExternal AI consultants assisted only at the beginning and were called on in rare cases when the development team was unsure how to proceed with a particular project.
“External AI consultants assisted only at the beginning, and they were only called on in rare cases when the development team was unsure how to proceed with a particular project”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn Company A, changes caused human agents to feel phobic when interacting with the machine and raised concerns about being automated away and unemployed.
“All these changes caused human agents to feel phobic when interacting with the machine, as they had the overall watch and check periodically that everything is in working order. From the employees’ point of view, these automations raised concerns as they saw themselves being automated and driven away from their posts, which could result in unemployment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCompany C uses cloud services to cover areas where development team members have no expertise or time to develop.
“In addition, cloud services are used to cover areas that the members of the development team have no expertise or the time to develop”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompany C's growth led to introducing data management roles and restrictions on data types and situations under which employees can access data, accomplished through data-gates.
“The growth in numbers led to the decision of introducing data management roles and restrictions on the data types and situations under which employees can access data. This was accomplished through data-gates where employees had to ask for permission from the supervisor of the system”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCompany B decided not to have a dedicated employee responsible for data management because of the simplicity in roles and because they do not deal with private data in their applications.
“This simplicity in roles and the fact that they do not deal with private data in their applications led to the decision to not have a dedicated employee responsible for data management.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningBecause of the weak AI limitation, Company B still uses conventional and traditional ways in parallel with AI, while planning to replace them over time.
“Because of that the company still uses conventional and traditional ways in parallel with AI, while they plan to replace them over time in the future”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompany C's AI applications focus on specific needs, usually involving forecasting ancillary services, customer needs (AI assistants), and reducing maintenance costs by minimizing business risks.
“The AI applications focus on specific needs, which usually involve forecasting ancillary services, customer needs (AI assistants) and reducing maintenance costs by minimizing business risks at the same time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningTwo main reasons Company C did not experience AI fear are extensive onboarding training and that job applicants are aware the firm uses extensive AI products and have prior knowledge or willingness to embrace AI.
“Two could be the main reasons for that. Firstly, employees have an extensive onboarding training process and secondly, people who applied to the company are aware that the firm uses extensive AI products; thus, work candidates have prior knowledge of AI technology and AI products or are willing to embrace AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCompany C uses APIs from different vendors to gather data for AI models.
“To gather the data for their AI models, Company C uses APIs from different vendors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCustomer feedback drove Company C to become more efficient and build new highly demanded services.
“A direct effect was that customers came with constructive feedback driving the firm to become even more efficient and building new services that were highly demanded”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCompany A held regular meetings explaining what AI can and cannot do to address employee fears.
“so we had regular meetings explaining what AI can do and not”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompany B initially used cloud services but moved to InfluxDB because cloud services were not flexible enough.
“Initially, the team used cloud services, but they were not flexible enough, or at least to their liking, so they moved to influx databases that allow storing and retrieving time series data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCompany C identified a big gap in the market because energy-producing companies did not offer customized services.
“Company C realized that there was a big gap in the market since energy-producing companies did not offer any customized services.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenLegal regulations forbid certain uses of AI, for example the prediction of energy prices.
“On top of that legal regulations forbid certain uses of AI, for example, the prediction of energy prices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEmployees in the case firms did not trust the AI outcomes and sometimes described the recommendations as naive.
“Employees did not trust the outcomes, sometimes they described the recommendations as naive, and most importantly, employees saw AI and automation as a way of losing their status and position.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFlexibility, productivity, and reduction of costs were immediate positive effects that Company A saw, allowing them to remain competitive and achieve their AI strategy goals.
“Flexibility, productivity, and reduction of costs were the immediate effects that the company saw as positive results allowing them to remain a competitive player while achieving their set up goals of their overall AI strategy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataDomain experts helped create meaningful dashboards for alerting information to employees, explaining historical data, and assisting in decision making for end users.
“In addition, domain experts help with the creation of meaningful dashboards that are responsible for alerting information to employees, explaining historical data and assisting in decision making for end users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIt became essential to increase the speed of models and scale up because the company increased the amount of data while creating new intelligence based on the data.
“Furthermore, it became essential to increase the speed of models and scale up because the company increased the amount of data while creating new intelligence based on the data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataCompany B used sensors and autoregressive (AR) models to detect anomalies in the system, saving time and effort and reducing maintenance costs in the long run.
“Based on these inputs, autoregressive (AR) models were developed to detect anomalies in the system, saving time and effort, which means fewer maintenance costs in the long run”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe changes toward cloud and automation boosted efficiency, and employees liked automation that lifted the heavy load of the work.
“These changes were boosting efficiency and employees liked automation that lifted the heavy load of the work”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCompanies in this study tried to create ML pipelines and interactive dashboards, but not all of them had a real focus on explainability of the results since they are still in early stages and focus on parts they believe are more urgent.
“companies in this study tried to create ML pipelines and interactive dashboards, but not all of them had a real focus on explainability of the results since they are still in early stages and focus on parts that they believe are more urgent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningDifferent concerns emerge at different phases of AI projects, so AI governance also encapsulates a temporal angle in its formation and deployment.
“In addition, different concerns emerge at different phases of AI projects, so AI governance also encapsulates a temporal angle in its formation and deployment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenAI governance requires continuous adaptation and modification as new data emerges or conditions change, for instance how employees perceive AI.
“One of the main challenges we identify is that AI governance requires continuous adaptation and modification as new data emerges or conditions change, for instance how employees perceive AI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenEmployees appreciate AI automating repetitive tasks since they do not want to do monotonous work.
“Firms should use AI for automating tasks that are repetitive, which is appreciated by employees since they do not want to do monotonous work”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAI governance is a multi-faceted issue for organizations and spans multiple levels, therefore requiring a structured approach when it is deployed.
“the study reveals not only that AI governance is a multi-faceted issue for organizations but that it spans multiple levels, therefore requiring a structured approach when it is deployed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe firms studied were leveraging AI to help them reinvent their operations, following an information analysis approach rather than an information collection approach.
“The firms we looked at were leveraging AI to help them reinvent their operations. Instead of having an information collection approach, these firms followed an information analysis approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe interviewees are experienced and have a solid understanding of AI development over time.
“This means they are experienced, and they gained a solid understanding of AI development over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAudio files were transcribed verbatim, making raw data transparent and findings reproducible.
“The audio files were transcribed in a verbatim way so that the text remains identical to the audio, meaning that all raw data are transparent, and the findings and results could be reproduced and tracked down rigorously.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI has the potential to generate business value in performance, productivity and effectiveness, but it is not autonomous; it works in concert with human capabilities.
“While AI has the potential to generate business value in terms of performance, productivity and effectiveness, it is not autonomous, as it works in concert with human capabilities (Zhang et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOrganizational capabilities result from combining and deploying multiple complementary resources within a firm to achieve competitive advantage.
“Consequently, organizational capabilities are the results of combining and deploying multiple complementary resources within a firm to achieve competitive advantage (Mikalef & Gupta, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mikalef & Gupta, 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningComparing the selected companies is fair because they are all in Norway, have similar AI teams in size and experience, and limited cultural differences.
“Comparing the selected companies is fair because (1) they are all allocated in Norway, (2) they have similar AI teams in terms of size and experience, although the size of the companies ranges, and (3) their cultural differences are limited.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI algorithms can be considered performative: they assist in decision-making, can form organizational processes, or take autonomous decisions, leading to new organizational capabilities.
“Simultaneously, the AI algorithms can be considered performative in the sense that they assist in decision-making, the extent to which their use can form organizational processes, or even take autonomous decisions (Faraj et al., 2018; Grønsund & Aanestad, 2020) that leads to new organization capabilities through AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe nature of AI projects undertaken by firms indicates they face similar challenges, so they require similar solutions.
“Also, the nature of AI projects undertaken by firms indicates that they face similar challenges, so they require similar solutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe text and audio were checked manually to ensure they matched.
“As part of the process, we had to go through the text and the audio to make sure everything was looking good since we wanted our text to match the audio and the only way to guarantee that was by checking all results manually.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBusinesses have implemented and deployed AI solutions to automate processes, increase efficiency and reduce costs, in order to gain competitive advantage.
“In order to gain a competitive advantage over their competitors (Raisch & Krakowski, 2021), businesses have implemented and deployed AI solutions to automate their processes, increase efficiency and reduce costs (Frank et al., 2019; Gregory et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenDependability was achieved by being consistent in the analysis process and being in line with the accepted standards.
“Dependability was achieved by being consistent in the analysis process and being in line with the accepted standards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBusinesses using AI continue to face challenges and are unable to immediately realize performance gains.
“However, despite the use of AI, businesses continue to face challenges and are unable to immediately realize performance gains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van den Broek et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe firms have common traits and operations, but they have some key differences in their business strategy.
“In terms of transferability, the firms have common traits and operations, but they have some key differences in their business strategy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is a gap in AI governance, which deals with both IT governance and data governance, and has a direct relationship with AI.
“There is, however, a gap in AI governance, which deals with both IT governance and data governance, and has a direct relationship with AI (Mikalef et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mikalef et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe study enhanced research methodology by strengthening credibility, dependability, transferability and confirmability.
“Trustworthiness in the evaluation process and the findings themselves were of the utmost importance; thus, we enhanced the research methodology by strengthening credibility, dependability, transferability and confirmability (Korstjens & Moser, 2018; Sikolia et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Korstjens & Moser, 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sikolia et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFirms need to introduce robust AI systems and mitigate AI risks, emphasizing the importance of creating suitable AI governance practices.
“Furthermore, firms need to introduce robust AI systems and mitigate AI risks, which emphasizes the importance of creating suitable AI governance practices.”
- Also stated in: § Governance of AI Projects · hedged
“Allowing the development of AI applications that are not under any supervision could be harmful (Chatterjee et al., 2020; Mishra & Pani, 2020); thus, it is important to promote a trustworthy AI that is lawful (complying with laws and regulations), ethical (ensuring ethical principles and values) and robust (from a technical and social perspective).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chatterjee et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mishra & Pani, 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Governance of AI Projects · hedged
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningData were analyzed and coded independently by three authors bringing various insights and points of view, allowing identification of similarities and differences, creating a comprehensible and coherent framework.
“What is more, data were analyzed and coded independently by three authors bringing various insights and points of view so that the authors could identify similarities and differences in their results, creating a comprehensible and coherent framework.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataDocuments served as validations for findings.
“These documents served both as validations for our findings as well as information that we did not have prior to the interviews, assisting us to obtain a better understanding of the vision, objectives and regulations of each company.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhen a firm optimizes firm-level resources and adopts AI technological innovations, it can enhance transformed projects' business value, driving business value and impacting performance.
“When a firm optimizes its firm-level resources and adopts AI technological innovations, it can enhance its transformed projects' business value which drives business value and impacts performance (Wamba-Taguimdje et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wamba-Taguimdje et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll firms operate in the same industry and have similar capabilities in collecting, analyzing and interpreting data for making business decisions.
“All firms operate in the same industry and have similar capabilities in terms of collecting, analyzing and interpreting data for making business decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThree iterations of data analysis were necessary to develop a theory based on empirical data.
“Hence, in order to develop a theory based on empirical data, it was necessary to establish three iterations of data analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe researchers validated findings by examining reports, public information, and presentations related to the research, focused on AI aspects.
“In order to obtain a high level of confidence, researchers validated findings by examining reports, public information and presentations related to this research and focused on the AI aspects (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataA total of 15 individuals were interviewed, including both domain and technical experts who have worked in their current positions for at least one year, but have relative experience of at least five years.
“A total of 15 individuals were interviewed, including both domain and technical experts who have worked in their current positions for at least one year, but have relative experience of at least five years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe value of AI in organizations varies based on the sector and the organization's activity.
“The value of AI in organizations varies based on the sector and the organization's activity(Collins et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Collins et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe similarity of outcomes across the cases could be because their desired goals were similar.
“That could be because their desired goals were similar.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEnablers include existing AI culture and architecture within a company, whereas inhibitors are mostly legal constraints, domain challenges, high development costs, and AI-phobia.
“Enablers include existing AI culture and architecture within a company, whereas inhibitors are mostly legal constraints, domain challenges, high development costs, and AI-phobia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLack of domain knowledge or lack of data for creating business intelligence can be an inhibitor.
“Another inhibitor could be lack of domain knowledge or lack of data for creating business intelligence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenBuilding AI capabilities would be impossible for Company C if it did not follow best development practices.
“Building these AI capabilities though would be impossible if the company did not follow best development practices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataAI development is usually more expensive than traditional software development.
“A note of caution is that AI development is usually more expensive than traditional software development”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
- Rests on an assumption: The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenLack of AI understanding could lead to AI phobia, which is a huge inhibitor when a digital transformation process is in place.
“The lack of AI understanding could lead to AI phobia, which is a huge inhibitor when digital transformation process is in place.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe proposed model includes structural, procedural, and relational components as key components and illustrates the techniques that companies have used over the last five years.
“Our model (Fig. 1), which includes the structural, procedural, and relational components as key components, illustrates the techniques that companies have used over the last five years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAI culture promotes the acceptance of AI, meaning that employees use and trust AI.
“AI culture promotes the acceptance of AI, meaning that employees use and trust AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe model's most essential results are a competitive advantage, cost reduction, and dependable AI systems.
“The model's most essential results are a competitive advantage, cost reduction, and dependable AI systems, all of which are critical to any business's success, particularly in competitive marketplaces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSuperiority in results boosts confidence in decisions and the potential customer value is high, especially for firms that have a more direct relationship with their clients.
“This superiority in results, boosts confidence in decisions and the potential customer value is high, especially for firms that have a more direct relationship with their clients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningNumerous impediments can lead to failure and waste of company resources.
“since numerous impediments can lead to failure and waste of company resources”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCompanies gain a significant competitive advantage over the competition as they can reduce the overall product cost and provide clients with exceptional services adapted to their specific needs.
“As a result, companies gain a significant competitive advantage over the competition as they can reduce the overall product cost and provide clients with exceptional services that adopt in their specific needs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe significance of governing AI can be critical in attaining digital innovation.
“The significance of governing AI can be critical in attaining digital innovation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningA unified system for building AI pipelines makes the system more robust, as it will be easier to maintain and improve different components of the system.
“Hence, the system will be more robust as it will be easier to maintain and improve different components of the system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAlthough several interviews were conducted with key employees within the organizations, the data collection was based on a snapshot in time and may not accurately reflect the complete breadth of practices.
“Second, while we conducted several interviews with key employees within the organizations, our data collection was based on a snapshot in time and may not accurately reflect the complete breadth of practices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationUnderstanding how people deal with emotional challenges is crucial for AI systems to emulate human reasoning.
“It is worth mention that emotional intelligence is not part of these systems although understanding how people deal with emotional challenges is crucial for AI systems to emulate human reasoning (Luong et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Luong et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe black-box nature of models and AI in general can be less problematic because the use of data visualizations simplifies complex data sets and provides end-users useful information that can affect business performance.
“That way the black-box nature of models and AI in general can be less problematic because the use of data visualizations simplifies complex data sets and provides end-users useful information that can affect business performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe data were collected through interviews with companies that do not require extensive use of sensitive data, so there might be bias in the data or an incomplete picture of the challenges around relevant practices.
“First, the data are collected through interviews with companies that do not require extensive use of sensitive data; thus, there might be bias in our data or provide an incomplete picture of the entire challenges around relevant practices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningData visualization facilitates greater transparency and a more direct way of revising the models used to analyze data.
“This in turn facilitates greater transparency and a more direct way of revising the models used to analyze data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAI allows organizations to gather online behavioral data and store it for a set period of time (e.g. one year) in accordance with GDPR regulations.
“second, it allows them to gather online behavioral data and store it for a set period of time (e.g. one year) in accordance with GDPR regulations (Trocin et al., 2021a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Trocin et al., 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHumans will be able to evaluate results and detect any outliers or anomalies in processed data.
“In other words, humans will be able to evaluate results and detect any outliers or anomalies in processed data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEmotional intelligence is not part of these AI systems.
“It is worth mention that emotional intelligence is not part of these systems although understanding how people deal with emotional challenges is crucial for AI systems to emulate human reasoning (Luong et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Luong et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe proposed model suggests that although there are inhibitors and barriers and despite the different ways of approaching AI governance, it offers positive outcomes if best practices are followed.
“Our proposed model suggests that although there are inhibitors and barriers and despite the different ways of approaching AI governance, it offers positive outcomes, if best practices are followed, and this study identified specific procedural, structural and relational components that are necessary for achieving this.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningManagers having extended conversations with employees of other departments ensuring them that AI will not replace them could be crucial for the company's internal stability, as people might lose trust in the leadership, leave the company taking their expertise with them, or resist using new technologies and try to undermine the value of AI.
“This could be crucial for the company’s internal stability as people might lose trust in the leadership, they might leave the company taking their expertise with them or resist using new technologies and try to undermine the value of AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study used a multi-case study of three organizations that have been using AI for several years, with a series of interviews with key respondents.
“Through a multi-case study of three organizations that have been using AI for several years, we conducted a series of interviews with key respondents and identified a set of activities that were relevant under each of the three dimensions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
AI governance is essential to achieve goals such as automating processes, increasing efficiency and reducing costs.
“To achieve these goals, AI governance is essential.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Input from both business and IT departments is needed to understand how AI governance is designed.
“as input from both departments is needed in order to understand how AI governance is designed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AI value realization is not yet fully understood.
“Hence, we argue that AI value realization is not yet fully understood and called for and specific governance practices may help in doing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AI Governance practices are not consolidated.
“AI Governance in both the public sector and private sector is a set of practices that still have not been consolidated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no established framework or theoretical model commonly accepted by industry that describes in detail the overall governance firms should adopt.
“In addition, there is no established framework or theoretical model that is commonly accepted by the industry and describes in detail the overall governance firms should adopt.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inadequate empirical data on mechanisms and procedures that firms deploy.
“The inadequate empirical data on mechanisms and procedures that firms deploy led us to engage this research using an exploratory, comparative case study approach that boosts generalizability while at the same time giving room for extending theory via cross-case analyses (Ramesh et al., 2017).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The interviewees' accounts accurately reflect the firms' AI governance practices.
“The interviewees talked about how their company transformed over the years and the necessary steps that were taken in order to expand and maintain a competitive advantage, while minimizing AI risks.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The three case companies are representative of firms in the energy sector or of AI governance best practices, so practices identified in them can be recommended for other companies.
“In the course of the discussion, we identified a number of patterns that were either similar or different and explored the reasons behind them through open discussion, trying to establish consistency and cohesion, arguing which interpretation seems most reasonable to our goal and how AI Governance is created among these cases and which practices companies should adopt or introduce.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Not all companies have managed to build AI solutions that have had significant organizational effects and resulted in added business value.
“However, not all companies have managed to build AI solutions that have had significant organizational effects and resulted in added business value.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent research has proposed solutions to AI-enabled ESG implementation problems, including hybrid data governance models, explainable AI models, stakeholder training, and staged digital transformation plans.
“Recent research have proposed solutions to these problems, including the adoption of hybrid data governance models, explainable AI models, stakeholder training and staged digital transformation plans68–70.”
From A decision-support framework for evaluating AI-enabled ESG strategies in the context of sustainable manufacturing systems (2025) · cites this paper as [70]
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455 · see citing works
(2014) · Cited by 15,747 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation-Augmentation Paradox
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. M. (2020) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/2018.0072 · Cited by 3,508 · see citing works
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018) · European Journal of General Practice · doi:10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092 · Cited by 3,217 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0072 · Cited by 2,755 · see citing works
Qualitative Research in Information Systems
Myers, M. D. (1997) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249422 · Cited by 2,485 · see citing works
(2018) · MIS Quarterly Executive · doi:10.17705/2msqe · Cited by 1,994 · see citing works
Mikalef, P., & Gupta, M. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103434 · Cited by 1,700 · see citing works
Self-citationThe qualitative research interview
Qu, S. Q., & Dumay, J. (2011) · Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management · doi:10.1108/11766091111162070 · Cited by 1,653 · see citing works
Wamba-Taguimdje, S.-L., Fosso Wamba, S., Kala Kamdjoug, J. R., & Tchatchouang Wanko, C. E. (2020) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-10-2019-0411 · Cited by 1,280 · cited 1× · see citing works
“When a firm optimizes its firm-level resources and adopts AI technological innovations, it can enhance its transformed projects' business value which drives business value and impacts performance (Wamba-Taguimdje et al., 2020).”
BackgroundResearching Information Systems and Computing
Oates, B. J., Griffiths, D. M., & McLean, R. (2022) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781036231330 · Cited by 1,196 · see citing works
Software Engineering for Machine Learning: A Case Study
Amershi, S., Begel, A., Bird, C., DeLine, R. A., Gall, H. C., Kamar, E. S., Nagappan, N., Nushi, B., & Zimmermann, T. (2019) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) · doi:10.1109/icse-seip.2019.00042 · Cited by 1,181 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Business Value: a Literature Review
Enholm, I. M., Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2022) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10186-w · Cited by 1,046 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As businesses adopt Artificial Intelligence (AI), they are faced with new value propositions, but they also have to deal with new challenges, such as reducing the gap between intent and action(Amershi et al., 2019; Enholm et al., 2021; Mishra & Pani, 2020).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWorking and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm
Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005 · Cited by 929 · see citing works
Managing artificial intelligence
Berente, N., Gu, B., Recker, J., & Santhanam, R. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/16274 · Cited by 898 · see citing works
Collins, C., Dennehy, D., Conboy, K., & Mikalef, P. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102383 · Cited by 783 · see citing works
Self-citationGoverning artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges
Cath, C. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0080 · Cited by 745 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(Cath, 2018).”
Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor
Frank, M. R., Autor, D., Bessen, J. E., Brynjolfsson, E., Cebrian, M., Deming, D. J., Feldman, M., Groh, M., Lobo, J., Moro, E., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1900949116 · Cited by 713 · see citing works
Big Data Research in Information Systems: Toward an Inclusive Research Agenda
University of Virginia, Abbasi, A., Sarker, S., University of Virginia, Aalto University, Chiang, R., & University of Cincinnati (2016) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00423 · Cited by 688 · see citing works
Qualitative Case Study Guidelines
Baškarada, S. (2014) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1008 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Data Network Effects for Creating User Value
Gregory, R. W., Henfridsson, O., Kaganer, E., & Kyriakou, H. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0178 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
From AI to digital transformation: The AI readiness framework
Holmström, J. (2021) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2021.03.006 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Health information technology and digital innovation for national learning health and care systems
Sheikh, A., Anderson, M., Albala, S. A., Casadei, B., Franklin, B. D., Richards, M. A., Taylor, D. G., Tibble, H., & Mossialos, E. A. (2021) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(21)00005-4 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Principles for Conducting Critical Realist Case Study Research in Information Systems1
Wynn, & Williams, C. K. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703481 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Augmenting the algorithm: Emerging human-in-the-loop work configurations
Grønsund, T., & Aanestad, M. (2020) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101614 · Cited by 364 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…AI algorithms can be considered per-formative in the sense that they assist in decision-making, the extent to which their use can form organizational processes, or even take autonomous decisions (Faraj et al., 2018; Grønsund & Aanestad, 2020) that leads to new organization capabilities through AI.”
BackgroundThe EU Approach to Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence
Smuha, N. A. (2019) · Computer Law Review International · doi:10.9785/cri-2019-200402 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
When the Machine Meets the Expert: An Ethnography of Developing AI for Hiring
van den Broek, E., Sergeeva, A., & Huysman, M. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/16559 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Will Humans-in-the-Loop Become Borgs? Merits and Pitfalls of Working with AI
Fügener, A., Grahl, J., Gupta, A., & Ketter, W. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/16553 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
The Information Artifact in IT Governance: Toward a Theory of Information Governance
Tallon, P. P., Ramirez, R. V., & Short, J. E. (2013) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222300306 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
The role of information governance in big data analytics driven innovation
Mikalef, P., Boura, M., Lekakos, G., & Krogstie, J. (2020) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2020.103361 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Self-citationStrategic Directions for AI: The Role of CIOs and Boards of Directors
Li, J., Li, M., Wang, X., & Thatcher, J. B. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/16523 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
A Review of IT Governance: A Taxonomy to Inform Accounting Information Systems
Wilkin, C. L., & Chenhall, R. H. (2010) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/jis.2010.24.2.107 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Trocin, C., Hovland, I. V., Mikalef, P., & Dremel, C. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121081 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, D., Pee, L. G., & Cui, L. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102304 · Cited by 228 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While AI has the potential to generate business value in terms of performance, productivity and effectiveness, it is not autonomous, as it works in concert with human capabilities (Zhang et al., 2021).”
BackgroundResponsible AI for Digital Health: a Synthesis and a Research Agenda
Trocin, C., Mikalef, P., Papamitsiou, Z., & Conboy, K. (2023) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10146-4 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Self-citationFailures of Fairness in Automation Require a Deeper Understanding of Human–ML Augmentation
Teodorescu, M. H., Morse, L., Awwad, Y., & Kane, G. C. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/16535 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
What is the State of Artificial Intelligence Governance Globally?
Butcher, J., & Beridze, I. (2019) · The RUSI Journal · doi:10.1080/03071847.2019.1694260 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Kar, A. K., & Kushwaha, A. K. (2023) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10219-4 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Multiple-case Study Methods in Governance-related Research
Stewart, J. (2011) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.589618 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Mariani, M. M., & Nambisan, S. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121009 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Chatterjee, S., Ghosh, S. K., & Chaudhuri, R. (2020) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-05-2019-0183 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Using Reflexive Interviewing to Foster Deep Understanding of Research Participants’ Perspectives
Pessoa, A. S. G., Harper, E. A., Santos, I. S., & Gracino, M. C. D. S. (2019) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406918825026 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Special Issue: Information Technology and Organizational Governance: The IT Governance Cube
Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B. R., & Venkatraman, N. V. (2013) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222300301 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Johnson, M., Albizri, A., & Harfouche, A. (2023) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10137-5 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Business value appropriation roadmap for artificial intelligence
Mishra, A. N., & Pani, A. K. (2021) · VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems · doi:10.1108/vjikms-07-2019-0107 · Cited by 82 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Allowing the development of AI applications that are not under any supervision could be harmful (Chatterjee et al., 2020; Mishra & Pani, 2020); thus, it is important to promote a trustworthy AI that is lawful (complying with laws and regulations), ethical (ensuring ethical principles and values)…”
BackgroundResearch on IT Governance, Risk, and Value: Challenges and Opportunities
Debreceny, R. S. (2013) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-10339 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Developing an Artificial Intelligence Capability: A Theoretical Framework for Business Value
Mikalef, P., Fjørtoft, S. O., & Torvatn, H. Y. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-36691-9_34 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationLebovitz, S., Levina, N., & Lifshitz-Assaf, H. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/16564 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Do Agile Managed Information Systems Projects Fail Due to a Lack of Emotional Intelligence?
Luong, T. T., Sivarajah, U., & Weerakkody, V. (2021) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-019-09962-6 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
AI management beyond the hype: exploring the co-constitution of AI and organizational context
Holmström, J., & Hällgren, M. (2021) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01249-2 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Scalable growth in IT-enabled service provisioning: a sensemaking perspective
Lewis, M. O., Mathiassen, L., & Rai, A. (2011) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2011.5 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
The Evolution of Information Governance at Intel
Tallon, P. P., Short, J. E., & Harkins, M. W. (2013) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Conflicts and complements between eastern cultures and agile methods: an empirical investigation
Ramesh, B., Cao, L., Kim, J., Mohan, K., & James, T. L. (2017) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/s41303-016-0023-0 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Toward big data and analytics governance: redefining structural governance mechanisms
Fadler, M., & Legner, C. (2021) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2021.691 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Saunders, C., Benlian, A., Henfridsson, O., & Wiener, M. (2020). IS Control & Governance. M. Quarterly.
- Sikolia, D., Biros, D., Mason, M., & Weiser, M. (2013). Trustworthiness of grounded theory methodology research in information systems Proceedings of the Eighth Midwest Association for Information Systems Conference, Illinois.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ooi, K.-B., Tan, G. W.-H., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Capatina, A., Chakraborty, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Huang, T.-L., Kar, A. K., Lee, V.-H., et al. (2025) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2023.2261010 · Cited by 746 · see citing works
Self-citationResponsible Artificial Intelligence Governance: A Review and Research Framework
Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., & Conboy, K. (2025) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101885 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Self-citationAI governance: themes, knowledge gaps and future agendas
Birkstedt, T., Minkkinen, M., Tandon, A., & Mäntymäki, M. (2023) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-01-2022-0042 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Camilleri, M. A. (2024) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.13406 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
AI Governance: A Systematic Literature Review
Batool, A., Zowghi, D., & Bano, M. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00653-w · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Hashid, A., & Almaqtari, F. A. (2024) · Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100218 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Laine, J., Minkkinen, M., & Mäntymäki, M. (2024) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2024.103969 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Sætra, H. S. (2022) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.2438 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Information Systems: Perspectives to Responsible AI
Dennehy, D., Griva, A., Pouloudi, N., Dwivedi, Y. K., Mäntymäki, M., & Pappas, I. (2022) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10365-3 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
The Role of IT Governance in the Integration of AI in Accounting and Auditing Operations
Almaqtari, F. A. (2024) · Economies · doi:10.3390/economies12080199 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Uncovering the dark side of AI-based decision-making: A case study in a B2B context
Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., Conboy, K., & van de Wetering, R. (2023) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.10.003 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentity, crimes, and law enforcement in the Metaverse
Qin, H. X., Wang, Y., & Hui, P. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-04266-w · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Dong, X., Zhou, N., Zhao, X., & Yang, S. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124439 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence governance: Understanding how public organizations implement it
de Almeida, P. G. R., & dos Santos, C. D. (2025) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2024.102003 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Wahab, M. D. A., & Radmehr, M. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29580 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Závodná, L. S., Überwimmer, M., & Frankus, E. (2024) · Journal of Economics and Management · doi:10.22367/jem.2024.46.13 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence and family businesses: a systematic literature review
Kumar, D., & Ratten, V. (2024) · Journal of Family Business Management · doi:10.1108/jfbm-08-2024-0160 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Blockchain and NFTs for Trusted Ownership, Trading, and Access of AI Models
Battah, A. A., Madine, M. M., Yaqoob, I., Salah, K., Hasan, H. R., & Jayaraman, R. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3215660 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
A five-layer framework for AI governance: integrating regulation, standards, and certification
Agarwal, A., & Nene, M. J. (2025) · Transforming Government People Process and Policy · doi:10.1108/tg-03-2025-0065 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Alruwaili, A. N., Alshammari, A. M., Alhaiti, A., Elsharkawy, N. B., Ali, S. I., & Ramadan, O. M. E. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03044-6 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Corporate Governance
Калкан, Г. (2024) · Journal of Corporate Finance Research / Корпоративные Финансы · doi:10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.18.2.2024.17-25 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Olawade, D. B., Weerasinghe, K., Teke, J., Msiska, M., Boussios, S., & Hatzidimitriadou, E. (2025) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105909 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Recent Literature on Data Governance (2017–2023)
Bližnák, K., Munk, M., & Pilková, A. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3476373 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
AI‐Powered Sustainable Tourism: Unlocking Circular Economies and Overcoming Resistance to Change
Hwang, B., Jitanugoon, S., & Puntha, P. (2025) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.4276 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Bena, Y. A., Ibrahim, R. B., Mahmood, J., Al-Dhaqm, A., Alshammari, A., Nasser, M., Yusuf, M. N., & Ayemowa, M. O. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3528941 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Aljohani, A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-09569-9 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Chaturvedi, A., Yadav, N., & Dasgupta, M. (2025) · International journal of human computer interactions · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2456534 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Activating supply chain business models' value potentials through Systems Engineering
Nürk, J., & Dařena, F. (2023) · Systems Engineering · doi:10.1002/sys.21676 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Theory and practice in secure software development lifecycle: A comprehensive survey
Otieno, M., Odera, D., & Ounza, J. E. (2023) · World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews · doi:10.30574/wjarr.2023.18.3.0944 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Xia, H., Chen, H., Zhang, Z., & Kamal, M. M. (2025) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124425 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Generative AI and the augmentation of information practices in knowledge work
Jarrahi, M. H., Li, L., Robinson, A. P., & Meng, S. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2551570 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Navigating the organizational AI journey: The AI transformation framework
Holmström, J., & Magnusson, J. (2025) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2025.01.002 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The role of use for the business value of big data analytics
Yeh, Y.-T., Eden, R., Fielt, E., & Syed, R. (2025) · Journal of strategic information systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2025.101888 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
An Integrative Theoretical Framework for Responsible Artificial Intelligence
Haidar, A. (2023) · International Journal of Digital Strategy Governance and Business Transformation · doi:10.4018/ijdsgbt.334844 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Public Administration 5.0: Enhancing Governance and Public Services with Smart Technologies
-, R. E. (2024) · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i04.26086 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Yawson, R. M., & Goryunova, E. (2025) · Advances in Developing Human Resources · doi:10.1177/15234223251335908 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Intelligent finance and change management implications
Guo, H.-C., & Polak, P. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01923-4 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Heinisuo, E., Kuoppakangas, P., & Stenvall, J. (2025) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-025-10599-x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Expanding AI adoption in public sector organizations: perspectives on management practices
Alamäki, A. V. (2025) · Transforming Government People Process and Policy · doi:10.1108/tg-05-2025-0124 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Huang, J., & Chen, Y. (2025) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.147117 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Leuthe, D., Meyer-Hollatz, T., Plank, T., & Senkmüller, A. (2024) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-024-10526-6 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Qin, H. X., Zhu, G., Fan, M., & Hui, P. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713569 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Zaidan, E., Truby, J., Ibrahim, I. A., & Hoppe, T. (2025) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103159 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Purpose-Driven Intelligence in Green Marketing
Emon, M. M. H. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3017-4.ch004 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Tong, A., Zainol, Z., Chong, T. S., & Renganathan, K. (2025) · Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers · doi:10.1108/yc-10-2024-2303 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The wheel of artificial intelligence governance
Monteiro, N., & Singh, V. (2025) · Sustainable Futures · doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101279 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Structured AI decision-making in disaster management
Dcruz, J. G., Zolotas, A. C., Greenwood, N. R., & Arana‐Catania, M. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-15317-w · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Doing versus saying: responsible AI among large firms
Bughin, J. (2024) · Ai & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02014-x · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Agarwal, S., Kweh, Q. L., Jamali, D., Wider, W., Hossain, S. F. A., & Fauzi, M. A. (2025) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-025-01480-7 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., & Conboy, K. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_5 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationTop Skills Honing for Today�s Accountants: a Literature Review
Joshi, P. L., & Dsouza, S. (2024) · The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.33312/ijar.765 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Research Frontiers in Machine Learning & Knowledge Extraction
Holzinger, A., Longo, L., Cangelosi, A., & Ser, J. D. (2025) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make8010006 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
AI and Data Privacy in Business
Gupta, A., Amarnani, M., Soanki, S., & Kishore, J. (2025) · International Conference on Advances in Computer Science, Electrical, Electronics, and Communication Technologies (CE2CT) · doi:10.1109/ce2ct64011.2025.10939576 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
AI in Governance and Policy Making
Saxena, A. K. (2024) · International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) · doi:10.21275/sr24519015426 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Ramya, R., Priya, S. B., Thamizhikkavi, P., & Anand, M. (2024) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-9173-0.ch004 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
A Conceptual Framework for AI Governance in Public Administration – A Smart Governance Perspective
Rajagopal, M., Ramkumar, S., Ramar, G., Mansurali, A., & Karuppasamy, S. K. (2023) · International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC) · doi:10.1109/i-smac58438.2023.10290366 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Hiremath, S., Ramesh, P., Konek, S. S., Bhavikatti, V., Vemula, R., & Omnamasivaya, B. (2025) · Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy · doi:10.1108/jepp-04-2025-0112 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Azenzoul, A., Mahouat, N., & Mokhlis, K. (2026) · Corporate Governance · doi:10.1108/cg-11-2025-0931 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Isagah, T., & Dhaou, S. B. (2023) · Digital Government Research · doi:10.1145/3598469.3598518 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A Survey of Bias and Fairness in Healthcare AI
Mienye, I. D., Obaido, G., Emmanuel, I. D., & Ajani, A. A. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) · doi:10.1109/ichi61247.2024.00103 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
AI Governance: Achieving EU AI Act Compliance in the Dynamo Project
Tikanmäki, I., Burns, F., Edelberg, J., Kuivanen, P., Tuomi, E., & Ylimaa, J. (2025) · European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security · doi:10.34190/eccws.24.1.3378 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Building antifragile manufacturing systems through strategic technology integration
Ghobakhloo, M., Foroughi, B., Fathi, M., Al‐Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., & Mubarak, M. F. (2025) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-08-2025-0789 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Hassan, A. M., Coert, J. H., Clemens, M. W., Hassanein, A. H., Waljee, J. F., Nelson, J. A., Mehrara, B. J., & Selber, J. C. (2026) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1097/xcs.0000000000001834 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The Readiness of the Public Sector to Implement AI: A Government-Specific Framework
Sirait, E. R. E., Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70274-7_19 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Revolution in Accounting and Auditing Field: A Bibliometric Analysis
Sallem, N. R. M., Hussain, N. H. C., Muhmad, S. N., Adnan, N. S., & Halmi, S. A. H. (2024) · Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal · doi:10.14738/assrj.119.2.17402 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Kasaye, M. D., Getahun, A. G., & Kalayou, M. H. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251330552 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The role of firm AI capabilities in generative AI-pair coding
Bughin, J. (2024) · Journal of Decision Systems · doi:10.1080/12460125.2024.2428187 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Nested Complexity” Framework for Human‐Centered AI ‐Augmented Leadership
Goryunova, E., & Yawson, R. M. (2025) · Journal of Leadership Studies · doi:10.1002/jls.70016 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Beulen, E., & Dans, M. A. (2026) · Information · doi:10.3390/info17040336 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Reinhard, P., Li, M. M., Peters, C., & Leimeister, J. M. (2026) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-026-10716-4 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Yiğitcanlar, T., David, A., Marasinghe, R., Senadheera, S., Hossain, T., Ye, X., & Taeihagh, A. (2026) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities9050081 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Almaqtari, F. A. (2024) · Information Discovery and Delivery · doi:10.1108/idd-08-2023-0085 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Towards an Industry 5.0 Enhanced by AI: A Theoretical Framework
BELKADI, A., & Bachiri, M. (2025) · doi:10.3390/engproc2025112002 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Smarter, not harder: the AI capability paradox in emerging-market SMEs
Lambert, J., Laskovaia, A. K., Garanina, O. L., & Bogatyreva, K. (2026) · Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies · doi:10.1108/jeee-10-2025-0632 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Machine Learning System Development in Information Systems Development Praxis
Laato, S., Minkkinen, M., Mäntymäki, M., & Dennehy, D. (2024) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.05406 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Sahu, S., Mallick, N., & Patnaik, S. (2024) · Practice, progress, and proficiency in sustainability · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-6336-2.ch007 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Protschky, D., Schüll, M., & Urbach, N. (2024) · Wirtschaftsinformatik & Management · doi:10.1365/s35764-024-00531-4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Tariq, U., & Ahmed, I. (2025) · Ubiquitous Technology Journal · doi:10.71346/utj.v1i2.21 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Burden to be Better in the Era of AI: Assessment of Barriers to GenAI Adoption Among NGOs
Kabra, G., & Saharan, A. (2025) · VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11266-025-00766-8 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Shatila, K. (2026) · Strategy & Leadership · doi:10.1108/sl-01-2026-0020 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Large language models for business and management applications: A review
Arslan, M., Munawar, S., Riaz, Z., & Cruz, C. (2026) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2026.104864 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Trust in human–AI collaboration in finance: a bibliometric–systematic literature review
Mirabile, M., Corazza, G. E., & Alonso, J. M. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03049-y · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The governance of artificial intelligence in agriculture: A review and future research directions
Ragany, M., Wolfert, J., & Dara, R. A. (2026) · Outlook on Agriculture · doi:10.1177/00307270261450225 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Strategic commitments shape collective cybersecurity under AI inequality
Bashir, A., Shamszaman, Z. U., Song, Z., Perc, M., & Han, T. A. (2026) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2026.118728 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Robert, M., Goff, R. L., Mignon, S., & Giuliani, P. (2023) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-023-05292-8 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Yi, S., Choi, J., & Kim, G. (2024) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669241276427 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Generative AI for Code Development: Advancements, Limitations, and Prospects
Krichen, M., & Abdalzaher, M. S. (2025) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-90573-5_7 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Fatimah, S., & Puspitasari, D. (2026) · Journal Economic Business Innovation · doi:10.69725/jebi.v2i4.321 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Konten Ilegal Kecerdasan Buatan Berbasis Deepfake dan Upaya Penanggulangannya di Indonesia
Lestari, P. A., Saputri, Z. R., Jamilah, R., Febiyanti, F., Fadilah, M. F., Firnanda, M. F., & Koeswara, T. S. N. (2025) · Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi · doi:10.51903/r5xwq018 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Dugonjić, I., Velikinac, N., Spalević, P., Stošić, L. V., Simic, V., Malisic, S., Antonijević, M., & Bačanin, N. (2026) · Smart Grids and Sustainable Energy · doi:10.1007/s40866-026-00343-y · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Beyond control? Governing AI in organizations for responsible use
Sturm, S. G., Krause, F., & van Giffen, B. (2026) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2026.06.003 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
American Public Health Association (2025) · NEW SOLUTIONS A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy · doi:10.1177/10482911251337448 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Examining the Barriers and Enablers of AI Adoption in a Multimedia Organization
Mkhize, T. G., Oosterwyk, G., & Kautondokwa, P. (2023) · EPiC series in computing · doi:10.29007/mgdl · Cited by 3 · see citing works
People, Machines, Enterprises and AI Unite for Impactful Change
Dwi, M., & Hidayatullah, A. N. A. (2024) · Journal of Ecohumanism · doi:10.62754/joe.v3i3.3438 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
IT Governance in the Artificial Intelligence Age: Trends and Practices
Ābelnīca, K., Petrovskis, G., Vindecs, A., & Romānovs, A. (2024) · International Scientific Conference on Information Technology and Management Science of Riga Technical University (ITMS) · doi:10.1109/itms64072.2024.10741935 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
AI and Decision-Making Process: A Meta-synthesis of the Literature
Javidan, A., & Za, S. (2024) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-76970-2_16 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Du, Y., Hao, G., & Zhu, H. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17177817 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The Convergence of AI Governance: A Framework for Privacy, Security, and Model Management
Devagiri, B. R. (2025) · European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology · doi:10.37745/ejcsit.2013/vol13n3898104 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Evaluating Canada's Position in AI Adoption for eHealth System
Kimiagari, S. (2025) · International Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.4018/ijkm.384590 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Preparing Ethics Advisors to AI Governance: Strategies, Regulations, Global Considerations
Carnevale, A. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05526-2_5 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Papagiannidis, E., Enholm, I. M., Dremel, C., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Papagiannidis, Emmanouil
- Venue
- Information Systems Frontiers
- Published
- 2022-04-20
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 123-141
- ISSN
- 1387-3326 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9419
- PMC
- PMC9018249
- OpenAlex
- W4224250711
- Semantic Scholar
- cbc38e465a14adcfc541c4ae82659955e636762b
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 82 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 31.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Information Systems Frontiers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- AI governance, artificial intelligence in organizations, energy sector, AI risk mitigation, best practices, implementation barriers, organizational decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review