Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 640

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacing of Photoaged Facial Skin

Richard E. Fitzpatrick·1996·Archives of Dermatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND DESIGN: public demand for procedures to rejuvenate photoaged skin have stimulated the use of high-energy short-pulsed carbon dioxide lasers as a precise and predictable treatment modality. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of clinical improvement achieved in treating perioral and periorbital wrinkles with a high-energy, microsecond-domain pulsed CO2 laser. Photodamaged skin in the perioral (n=73) and periorbital (n=38) regions was treated with multiple passes of confluent single pulses of CO2 laser energy (10 600 nm, 3-mm collimated beam, <1- millisecond pulse, 450 mJ per pulse, 2 to 5 W), with the tissue being cleansed and débrided with normal saline between passes. A nine-point clinical scoring system was devised for evaluation of the degree of wrinkling and photodamage present. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were independently scored by four ¿blinded¿ reviewers. The patients were observed postoperatively for 1 to 12 months for the course of healing, and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: All three classes (mild, moderate, and severe) of photoaging of the skin responded equally well, showing an average wrinkling score reduction of 2.25 for the periorbital region and 2.34 for the perioral region, the most superficial wrinkles and photodamage being eliminated and the more severe being markedly improved. An unexpected finding was tightening of loose and folded skin. Side effects included transient erythemia and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, and one instance of an isolated hypertrophic scar. CONCLUSIONS: Resurfacing of photoaged skin by means of a high-energy, microsecond-domain pulsed CO2 laser with a specific clinical treatment protocol results in predictable improvement in perioral and periorbital wrinkling and photodamage with minimal risks. Heat-induced collagen shrinkage appears to contribute to these results by tightening loose skin and folds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1001/archderm.132.4.395

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 640

Metadata

Authors
Fitzpatrick, R. E.
Venue
Archives of Dermatology
Publisher
American Medical Association
Published
1996-04-01
Volume
132
Issue
4
Pages
395-395
ISSN
0003-987X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091335998
Cited by
640
References
1
FWCI
59.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacing of Photoaged Facial Skin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archderm.132.4.395
The paper
Fitzpatrick, R. E. (1996). Pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacing of Photoaged Facial Skin. Archives of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.132.4.395

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.