The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
The Diagnosis of Primary Aldosteronism and Separation of Two Major Subtypes
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To develop a simple screening and diagnostic test for primary aldosteronism and to compare it with established techniques. DESIGN: Comparison of several techniques for screening, diagnosis, and differentiation of primary aldosteronism using normotensive and hypertensive subjects. METHODS: Four hundred thirty-four normotensive subjects, 263 essential hypertensive subjects, 48 subjects with primary aldosteronism due to a unilateral adrenal adenoma, and 14 in whom primary aldosteronism was associated with findings of bilateral hyperaldosteronism were studied. Plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone were measured in venous blood obtained at 8 AM after 2 hours of ambulation and compared with established suppressive (plasma aldosterone) and stimulatory (plasma renin activity) maneuvers used for the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism. RESULTS: The ratio of plasma aldosterone to plasma renin activity provided complete separation of patients with primary aldosteronism from the normal and essential hypertensive groups. Moreover, based on the use of traditional localizing procedures separating unilateral hyperaldosteronism due to a solitary adenoma from bilateral hyperaldosteronism, confirmed by surgical intervention in the former subgroup, the ratio provided differentiation of these two forms of primary aldosteronism. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the plasma aldosterone to plasma renin activity ratio appears to be useful in the screening, diagnosis, and differentiation of unilateral and bilateral forms of primary aldosteronism. These observations may also be applicable to patients receiving some antihypertensive medications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Incidentally Discovered Adrenal Masses*
KLOOS, R. T., GROSS, M. D., FRANCIS, I. R., KOROBKIN, M., & SHAPIRO, B. (1995) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv-16-4-460 · Cited by 828
The clinically inapparent adrenal mass: update in diagnosis and management
Mansmann, G., Lau, J., Balk, E., Rothberg, M., Miyachi, Y., & Bornstein, S. R. (2004) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2002-0031 · Cited by 781
Hyperaldosteronism Among Black and White Subjects With Resistant Hypertension
Calhoun, D. A., Nishizaka, M. K., Zaman, M. A., Thakkar, R. B., & Weissmann, P. (2002) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000040261.30455.b6 · Cited by 763
Primary aldosteronism: renaissance of a syndrome
Young, W. F. (2007) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02775.x · Cited by 680
Zeiger, M. A., Thompson, G. B., Duh, Q.-Y., Hamrahian, A. H., Angelos, P., Elaraj, D., Fishman, E., Kharlip, J., Zeiger, M. A., Thompson, G. B., et al. (2009) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep.15.s1.1 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Weinberger, M. H.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1993-09-27
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2125-2125
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087915352
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Diagnosis of Primary Aldosteronism and Separation of Two Major Subtypes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.153.18.2125
- The paper
- Weinberger, M. H. (1993). The Diagnosis of Primary Aldosteronism and Separation of Two Major Subtypes. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.153.18.2125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.