The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Death and End-of-Life Planning in One Midwestern Community
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The major health care organizations in a geographically defined area implemented an extensive, collaborative advance directive education program approximately 2 years prior to this study. OBJECTIVES: To determine for a geographically defined population the prevalence and type of end-of-life planning and the relationship between end-of-life plans and decisions in all local health care organizations, including hospitals, medical clinics, long-term care facilities, home health agencies, hospices, and the county health department. METHODS: For more than 11 months, end-of-life planning and decisions were retrospectively studied for all adult decedents residing in areas within 5 ZIP codes. These decedents were mentally capable in the 10 years prior to death and died while under the care of the participating health care organizations. Data were collected from medical records and death certificates. Treating physicians and decedent proxies were also contacted for interviews. RESULTS: A total of 540 decedents were included in this study. The prevalence of written advance directives was 85%. Almost all these documents (95%) were in the decedent's medical record. The median time between advance directive documentation and death was 1.2 years. Almost all advance directive documents requested that treatment be forgone as death neared. Treatment was forgone in 98% of the deaths. Treatment preferences expressed in advance directives seemed to be consistently followed while making end-of-life decisions. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a more complete picture of death, end-of-life planning, and decision making in a geographic area where an extensive advance directive education program exists. It indicates that advance planning can be prevalent and can effectively guide end-of-life decisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Detering, K. M., Hancock, A. D., Reade, M. C., & Silvester, W. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c1345 · Cited by 2,332
Morrison, R. S., & Meier, D. E. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp035232 · Cited by 542
Hammes, B. J., Rooney, B. L., & Gundrum, J. D. (2010) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02956.x · Cited by 214
Self-citationMorrison, R. S., Chichin, E., Carter, J., Burack, O., Lantz, M., & Meier, D. E. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53116.x · Cited by 206
Hickman, S. E., Nelson, C. A., Perrin, N. A., Moss, A. H., Hammes, B. J., & Tolle, S. W. (2010) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02955.x · Cited by 203
Self-citationKlingler, C., in der Schmitten, J., & Marckmann, G. (2016) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216315601346 · Cited by 201
Detering, K., Silvester, W., Corke, C., Milnes, S., Fullam, R., Lewis, V., & Renton, J. (2014) · BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care · doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000450 · Cited by 92
Incidence and predictors of advance care planning among persons with cognitive impairment.
Garand, L., Dew, M. A., Lingler, J. H., & DeKosky, S. T. (2011) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/jgp.0b013e3181faebef · Cited by 84
Goals of care or goals of trust? how family members perceive goals for dying nursing home residents
Rosemond, C., Hanson, L. C., & Zimmerman, S. (2017) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2016.0271 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammes, B. J., & Rooney, B. L.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-02-23
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 383
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073869152
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.