The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effects of Remote, Intercessory Prayer on Outcomes in Patients Admitted to the Coronary Care Unit
Abstract
CONTEXT: Intercessory prayer (praying for others) has been a common response to sickness for millennia, but it has received little scientific attention. The positive findings of a previous controlled trial of intercessory prayer have yet to be replicated. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether remote, intercessory prayer for hospitalized, cardiac patients will reduce overall adverse events and length of stay. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, double-blind, prospective, parallel-group trial. SETTING: Private, university-associated hospital. PATIENTS: Nine hundred ninety consecutive patients who were newly admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU). INTERVENTION: At the time of admission, patients were randomized to receive remote, intercessory prayer (prayer group) or not (usual care group). The first names of patients in the prayer group were given to a team of outside intercessors who prayed for them daily for 4 weeks. Patients were unaware that they were being prayed for, and the intercessors did not know and never met the patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The medical course from CCU admission to hospital discharge was summarized in a CCU course score derived from blinded, retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Compared with the usual care group (n = 524), the prayer group (n = 466) had lower mean +/- SEM weighted (6.35 +/- 0.26 vs 7.13 +/- 0.27; P=.04) and unweighted (2.7 +/- 0.1 vs 3.0 +/- 0.1; P=.04) CCU course scores. Lengths of CCU and hospital stays were not different. CONCLUSIONS: Remote, intercessory prayer was associated with lower CCU course scores. This result suggests that prayer may be an effective adjunct to standard medical care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · Cited by 49,742
Hapeman, D. E. (1991) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484817 · Cited by 9,373
Eisenberg, D. M., Davis, R. B., Ettner, S. L., Appel, S., Wilkey, S., Van Rompay, M., & Kessler, R. C. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.18.1569 · Cited by 6,658
Selye, H. (1956) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,224
Multiple comparisons among means
Dunn, O. J. (1961) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090 · Cited by 5,006
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXII: How to Use Articles About Clinical Decision Rules
McGinn, T. G., Guyatt, G. H., Wyer, P. C., Naylor, C. D., Stiell, I. G., Richardson, W. S., & for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.1.79 · Cited by 1,014
Laupacis, A. (1997) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540300056034 · Cited by 793
Psychosocial Modifiers of Immunocompetence in Medical Students
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Garner, W., Speicher, C., Penn, G. M., Holliday, J., & Glaser, R. (1984) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-198401000-00003 · Cited by 782
Positive Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer in a Coronary Care Unit Population
BYRD, R. C. (1988) · Southern Medical Journal · doi:10.1097/00007611-198807000-00005 · Cited by 583
Methodologic Standards for the Development of Clinical Decision Rules in Emergency Medicine
STIELL, I., & WELLS, G. (1999) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70309-4 · Cited by 571
Cited by
Religion and spirituality: Linkages to physical health.
Powell, L. H., Shahabi, L., & Thoresen, C. E. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.36 · Cited by 1,093
A Biopsychosocial-Spiritual Model for the Care of Patients at the End of Life
Sulmasy, D. P. (2002) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/42.suppl_3.24 · Cited by 854
Discussing Spirituality With Patients: A Rational and Ethical Approach
McCord, G. (2004) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.71 · Cited by 289
Benson, H., Dusek, J. A., Sherwood, J. B., Lam, P., Bethea, C. F., Carpenter, W., Levitsky, S., Hill, P. C., Clem, D. W., Jain, M. K., et al. (2006) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2005.05.028 · Cited by 287
RELIGION AND HEALTH: A REVIEW AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS
Lee, B. Y., & Newberg, A. B. (2005) · Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00674.x · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, W. S., Gowda, M., Kolb, J. W., Strychacz, C. P., Vacek, J. L., Jones, P. G., Forker, A., O'Keefe, J. H., & McCallister, B. D.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1999-10-01
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 2273-8
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104260386
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 40.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effects of Remote, Intercessory Prayer on Outcomes in Patients Admitted to the Coronary Care Unit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.159.19.2273
- The paper
- Harris, W. S., Gowda, M., Kolb, J. W., Strychacz, C. P., Vacek, J. L., Jones, P. G., Forker, A., O'Keefe, J. H., & McCallister, B. D. (1999). A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effects of Remote, Intercessory Prayer on Outcomes in Patients Admitted to the Coronary Care Unit. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.159.19.2273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.