Cited by 165Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsStudy and Philosophy of Religion

RELIGION AND HEALTH: A REVIEW AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS

Open access
Lee, Bruce Y., Newberg, Andrew B.·2005·Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science

Abstract

Abstract. The study of the relationship between religion and health has grown substantially in the past decade. There is little doubt that religion plays an important role in many people's lives and that this has an impact on their health. The question is how researchers and clinicians can best evaluate the available information and how we can improve upon the current findings. In this essay we review the current knowledge regarding religion and health and also critically review issues pertaining to methodology, findings, and interpretation of these studies. It is important to maintain a rigorous perspective with regard to such studies and also to recognize inherent limitations and suggest constructive ways in which to advance this field of study. In the end, such an approach can provide new information that will improve our understanding of the overall relationship between religion and health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00674.x

Cites

227 of 227 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Matthews, D. A., and C.Clark. 1998. The Faith Factor: Proof of the Healing Power of Prayer. New York : Viking (Penguin‐Putnam).
  2. “Spiritual Assessment Required in All Settings.”2003. Hospital Peer Review 28: 55–56.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, B. Y., & Newberg, A. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Newberg, Andrew B.
Venue
Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science
Published
2005-06-02
Volume
40
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0591-2385 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9744
OpenAlex
W2103336559
Cited by
165
References
227
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Zygon® (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
religion and health, religiosity, health outcomes, research methodology critique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review