Cited by 333Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutHospital Admissions and OutcomesSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Burnout and Internal Medicine Resident Work-Hour Restrictions

Gopal, Ravi, Glasheen, Jeffrey J., Miyoshi, Tom J., Prochazka, Allan V.·2005·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Burnout is very common in internal medicine residents. Effective July 2003, all residents were restricted to work less than an average of 80 hours per week and no more than 30 hours of continuous duty for patient care and educational obligations. We evaluated rates of burnout in internal medicine residents before and after the implementation of the new work-hour restriction. METHODS: University of Colorado Health Science Center internal medicine residents were surveyed in May 2003 and May 2004. The survey contained the Maslach Burnout Inventory, organized into 3 subscales (ie, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment); the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders depression screen; and self-reported quality of care and education. RESULTS: The response rate was 87% (121 of 139 residents) and 74% (106 of 143 residents) in 2003 and 2004, respectively. Self-reported hours worked decreased from a mean of 74.6 to 67.1 (P = .003). In 2004, 13% fewer residents experienced high emotional exhaustion (42% vs 29%; P = .03). There was a trend toward fewer residents with high depersonalization (61% vs 55%; P = .13) and fewer residents with a positive depression screen (51% vs 41%; P = .11). Personal accomplishment did not change. The assessment of self-reported quality of care did not significantly change from 2003 to 2004. Residents reported attending fewer educational conferences per month (18.99 vs 15.56; P = .01). Overall residency satisfaction decreased 6 mm on a 100-mm visual analogue score (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Burnout continues to be a major problem. Reducing hours may be the first step to reduce burnout but may also affect education and quality of care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.165.22.2595

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gopal, R., Glasheen, J. J., Miyoshi, T. J., & Prochazka, A. V.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Health (US)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2005-12-12
Volume
165
Issue
22
Pages
2595
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157109445
Cited by
333
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
31.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
burnout, internal medicine residents, resident work hour restrictions, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, depression, quality of care, resident education, Maslach Burnout Inventory
MeSH terms
Adult, Burnout, Professional, Colorado, Female, Humans, Internal Medicine, Internship and Residency, Job Satisfaction, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Physicians, Prospective Studies, Quality of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Work Schedule Tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review