Cited by 157Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare

Communication About Chronic Critical Illness

Open access
Nelson, Judith E.·2007·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite poor outcomes, life-sustaining treatments including mechanical ventilation are continued for a large and growing population of patients with chronic critical illness. This may be owing in part to a lack of understanding resulting from inadequate communication between clinicians and patients and families. Our objective was to investigate the informational needs of patients with chronic critical illness and their families and the extent to which these needs are met. METHODS: In this prospective observational study conducted at 5 adult intensive care units in a large, university-affiliated hospital in New York, New York, 100 patients with chronic critical illness (within 3-7 days of elective tracheotomy for prolonged mechanical ventilation) or surrogates for incapacitated patients were surveyed using an 18-item questionnaire addressing communication about chronic critical illness. Main outcome measures included ratings of importance and reports of whether information was received about questionnaire items. RESULTS: Among 125 consecutive, eligible patients, 100 (80%) were enrolled; questionnaire respondents included 2 patients and 98 surrogates. For all items, more than 78% of respondents rated the information as important for decision making (>98% for 16 of 18 items). Respondents reported receiving no information for a mean (SD) of 9.0 (3.3) of 18 items, with 95% of respondents reporting not receiving information for approximately one-quarter of the items. Of the subjects rating the item as important, 77 of 96 (80%) and 69 of 74 (93%) reported receiving no information about expected functional status at hospital discharge and prognosis for 1-year survival, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients and their families may lack important information for decision making about continuation of treatment in the chronic phase of critical illness. Strategies for effective communication in this clinical context should be investigated and implemented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.167.22.2509

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, J. E.
Affiliations
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Nelson, Judith E.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2007-12-10
Volume
167
Issue
22
Pages
2509
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164388803
Cited by
157
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k02ag024476-02)
  • National Institute on Aging (K02-AG024476)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Keywords
chronic critical illness, patient-family communication, information needs, prolonged mechanical ventilation, tracheotomy, surrogate decision-making, prognosis disclosure, life-sustaining treatment, intensive care unit, end-of-life decisions
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Communication, Decision Making, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New York, Physician-Patient Relations, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Truth Disclosure, Incidence, Survival Rate, Critical Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review