The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Health Care Cost of Drug-Related Morbidity and Mortality in Nursing Facilities
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preventable drug-related morbidity and mortality within nursing facilities represent a serious problem urgently requiring expert medical attention. The health care costs of drug-related problems can be both immense and avoidable. However, the research to date has been narrow in scope, focusing on the drug costs avoided and failing to consider the wider range of possible negative outcomes and potential drug-related problems. OBJECTIVES: To develop a model of therapeutic outcomes resulting from drug therapy within nursing facilities, to estimate the magnitude of the cost of drug-related morbidity and mortality within nursing facilities in the United States, and to assess the impact of pharmacist-conducted, federally mandated, monthly, retrospective review of nursing facility residents' drug regimens in reducing the cost of drug-related morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Using decision analysis techniques, a probability pathway model was developed to estimate the cost of drug-related problems within nursing facilities. An expert panel consisting of consultant pharmacists and physicians with practice experience in nursing facilities and geriatric care was surveyed to determine conditional probabilities of therapeutic outcomes attributable to drug therapy. Health care utilization and associated costs derived from negative therapeutic outcomes were estimated. RESULTS: Baseline estimates indicate that the cost of drug-related morbidity and mortality with the services of consultant pharmacists was $4 billion compared with $7.6 billion without the services of consultant pharmacists. CONCLUSIONS: Drug-related morbidity and mortality in nursing facilities represent a serious economic problem. For every dollar spent on drugs in nursing facilities, $1.33 in health care resources are consumed in the treatment of drug-related problems. With the current federally mandated drug regimen review, it is estimated that consultant pharmacists help to reduce health care resources attributed to drug-related problems in nursing facilities by $3.6 million.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fick, D. M., Cooper, J. W., Wade, W. E., Waller, J. L., Maclean, J. R., & Beers, M. H. (2003) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.163.22.2716 · Cited by 2,389
Drug-Related Morbidity and Mortality: Updating the Cost-of-Illness Model
Ernst, F. R., & Grizzle, A. J. (2001) · Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (1996) · doi:10.1016/s1086-5802(16)31229-3 · Cited by 849
Aging Biology and Geriatric Clinical Pharmacology
McLean, A. J., & Le Couteur, D. G. (2004) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.56.2.4 · Cited by 771
Burns, A. (2008) · Journal of the American Pharmacists Association · doi:10.1331/japha.2008.08514 · Cited by 477
Clinical pharmacology in the geriatric patient
Hilmer, S. N., McLachlan, A. J., & Le Couteur, D. G. (2007) · Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1472-8206.2007.00473.x · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Bootman, J. L.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-10-13
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2089
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118298006
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Health Care Cost of Drug-Related Morbidity and Mortality in Nursing Facilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.1997.00440390083011
- The paper
- Bootman, J. L. (1997). The Health Care Cost of Drug-Related Morbidity and Mortality in Nursing Facilities. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1997.00440390083011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.