Cited by 43Fatty Acid Research and HealthMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsPharmaceutical industry and healthcare

The Big Ones That Got Away: Omega-3 Meta-analysis Flawed by Excluding the Biggest Fish Oil Trials—Reply

Kwak, Sang Mi, Myung, Seung-Kwon·2012·Archives of Internal Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4300

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kwak, S. M., & Myung, S.-K.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2012-10-08
Volume
172
Issue
18
Pages
1427-8
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986426702
Cited by
43
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Keywords
omega-3 fatty acids, fish oil, meta-analysis methodology, trial exclusion, cardiovascular disease prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review