The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cerebral Morphologic Distinctions Between Williams and Down Syndromes
Open accessAbstract
Neurobehavioral studies of Williams syndrome (WS) and Down syndrome (DS) have revealed distinct profiles of cognitive strengths and weaknesses. In a previous report, we described several gross brain morphologic distinctions on magnetic resonance images between these two disorders. While the observed cerebral hypoplasia was of equal degree in the two groups, cerebellar size was entirely normal in the subjects with WS but dramatically reduced in subjects with DS. In WS, paleocerebellar vermal lobules subtended a smaller area on midsagittal sections, but neocerebellar lobules were actually larger. These results suggested important distinctions between WS and DS in terms of the action and anatomic targets of factors that alter brain development in these syndromes. The present study extends the earlier findings by focusing in detail on the morphologic features of the cerebral hemispheres, particularly cerebral gray matter. The results suggest that some frontal and temporal limbic structures are relatively preserved in WS, while some basal ganglia and diencephalic structures are relatively preserved in DS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MATURATION OF HUMAN CEREBRUM OBSERVED IN VIVO DURING ADOLESCENCE
JERNIGAN, T. L., TRAUNER, D. A., HESSELINK, J. R., & TALLAL, P. A. (1991) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/114.5.2037 · Cited by 444
Self-citationThe neurobiologie consequences of down syndrome
Coyle, J. T., Oster-Granite, M. L., & Gearhart, J. D. (1986) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/0361-9230(86)90074-2 · Cited by 248
LATE CHILDHOOD CHANGES IN BRAIN MORPHOLOGY OBSERVABLE WITH MRI
Jernigan, T. L., & Tallal, P. (1990) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1990.tb16956.x · Cited by 202
Self-citationDissociated visual perceptual and spatial deficits in focal lesions of the right hemisphere
Newcombe, F., & Russell, W. R. (1969) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.32.2.73 · Cited by 201
Cited by
Dendritic Anomalies in Disorders Associated with Mental Retardation
Kaufmann, W. E. (2000) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/10.10.981 · Cited by 731
The neuropsychology of down syndrome: evidence for hippocampal dysfunction.
Pennington, B. F., Moon, J., Edgin, J., Stedron, J., & Nadel, L. (2003) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00522 · Cited by 514
II. Hypersociability in Williams Syndrome
Jones, W., Bellugi, U., Lai, Z., Chiles, M., Reilly, J., Lincoln, A., & Adolphs, R. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892900561968 · Cited by 503
Self-citationNeuroanatomy of Down’s Syndrome: A High-Resolution MRI Study
Pinter, J. D., Eliez, S., Schmitt, J. E., Capone, G. T., & Reiss, A. L. (2001) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.10.1659 · Cited by 452
Bridging cognition, the brain and molecular genetics: evidence from Williams syndrome
Bellugi, U., Lichtenberger, L., Mills, D., Galaburda, A., & Korenberg, J. R. (1999) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(99)01397-1 · Cited by 353
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jernigan, T. L., Bellugi, U., Sowell, E., Doherty, S., & Hesselink, J. R.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-02-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 186-191
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065598529
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cerebral Morphologic Distinctions Between Williams and Down Syndromes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1993.00540020062019
- The paper
- Jernigan, T. L., Bellugi, U., Sowell, E., Doherty, S., & Hesselink, J. R. (1993). Cerebral Morphologic Distinctions Between Williams and Down Syndromes. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1993.00540020062019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.