Cited by 503Williams Syndrome ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

II. Hypersociability in Williams Syndrome

Jones, Wendy, Bellugi, Ursula, Lai, Zona, Chiles, Michael, Reilly, Judy, Lincoln, Alan, Adolphs, Ralph·2000·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Studies of abnormal populations provide a rare opportunity for examining relationships between cognition, genotype and brain neurobiology, permitting comparisons across these different levels of analysis. In our studies, we investigate individuals with a rare, genetically based disorder called Williams syndrome (WMS) to draw links among these levels. A critical component of such a cross-domain undertaking is the clear delineation of the phenotype of the disorder in question. Of special interest in this paper is a relatively unexplored unusual social phenotype in WMS that includes an overfriendly and engaging personality. Four studies measuring distinct aspects of hypersocial behavior in WMS are presented, each probing specific aspects in WMS infants, toddlers, school age children, and adults. The abnormal profile of excessively social behavior represents an important component of the phenotype that may distinguish WMS from other developmental disorders. Furthermore, the studies show that the profile is observed across a wide range of ages, and emerges consistently across multiple experimental paradigms. These studies of hypersocial behavior in WMS promise to provide the ground-work for crossdisciplinary analyses of gene-brain-behavior relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/089892900561968

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, W., Bellugi, U., Lai, Z., Chiles, M., Reilly, J., Lincoln, A., & Adolphs, R.
Affiliations
  • Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Alliant University (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2000-03-01
Volume
12
Issue
Supplement 1
Pages
30-46
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2109056388
Cited by
503
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 24
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (P50-DC01289, P50DC001289)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50 NS 22343, P50NS022343)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01 HD 33113, P01HD033113)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
Williams syndrome, hypersociability, social phenotype, gene-brain-behavior relationship, genotypes, cognitive phenotypes, developmental disorders, personality, infants and toddlers, elementary school students, adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Separation, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child, Preschool, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Infant, Interview, Psychological, Language Development, Male, Psychological Tests, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Williams Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review