The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simulated Car Crashes and Crash Predictors in Drivers With Alzheimer Disease
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia and can impair cognitive abilities crucial to the task of driving. Rational decisions about whether such impaired individuals should continue to drive require objective assessments of driver performance. OBJECTIVE: To measure relevant performance factors using high-fidelity driving simulation. DESIGN: We examined the effect of AD on driver collision avoidance using the Iowa Driving Simulator, which provided a high-fidelity, closely controlled environment in which to observe serious errors by at-risk drivers. We determined how such unsafe events are predicted by visual and cognitive factors sensitive to decline in aging and AD. SETTING: The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, and the Iowa Driving Simulator. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine licensed drivers: 21 with AD and 18 controls without dementia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We determined the number of crashes and related performance errors and analyzed how these occurrences were predicted by visual and cognitive factors. RESULTS: Six participants (29%) with AD experienced crashes vs 0 of 18 control participants (P = .022). Drivers with AD were more than twice as likely to experience close calls (P = .042). Plots of critical control factors in the moments preceding a crash revealed patterns of driver in-attention and error. Strong predictors of crashes included visuospatial impairment, reduction in the useful field of view, and reduced perception of 3-dimensional structure-from-motion. CONCLUSIONS: High-fidelity driving simulation provides a unique new source of performance parameters to standardize the assessment of driver fitness. Detailed observations of crashes and other safety errors provide unbiased evidence to aid in the difficult clinical decision of whether older or medically impaired individuals should continue to drive. The findings are complementary to evidence currently being gathered using techniques from epidemiology and cognitive neuroscience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A SWOT Analysis of the Field of Virtual Reality Rehabilitation and Therapy
Rizzo, A. “., & Kim, G. J. (2005) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/1054746053967094 · Cited by 877
Speed-of-Processing and Driving Simulator Training Result in Improved Driving Performance
Roenker, D. L., Cissell, G. M., Ball, K. K., Wadley, V. G., & Edwards, J. D. (2003) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.45.2.218.27241 · Cited by 469
Virtual Reality in Brain Damage Rehabilitation: Review
Rose, F. D., Brooks, B. M., & Rizzo, A. A. (2005) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.241 · Cited by 469
Owsley, C., & McGwin, G. (2010) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.021 · Cited by 451
Is clinical virtual reality ready for primetime?
Rizzo, A. “., & Koenig, S. T. (2017) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000405 · Cited by 372
Metadata
- Authors
- Rizzo, M., Reinach, S., McGehee, D., & Dawson, J.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-05-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 545-551
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091635052
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulated Car Crashes and Crash Predictors in Drivers With Alzheimer Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1997.00550170027011
- The paper
- Rizzo, M., Reinach, S., McGehee, D., & Dawson, J. (1997). Simulated Car Crashes and Crash Predictors in Drivers With Alzheimer Disease. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1997.00550170027011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.