Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 231

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Simulated Car Crashes and Crash Predictors in Drivers With Alzheimer Disease

Rizzo, M., Reinach, S., McGehee, D., Dawson, J.·1997·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia and can impair cognitive abilities crucial to the task of driving. Rational decisions about whether such impaired individuals should continue to drive require objective assessments of driver performance. OBJECTIVE: To measure relevant performance factors using high-fidelity driving simulation. DESIGN: We examined the effect of AD on driver collision avoidance using the Iowa Driving Simulator, which provided a high-fidelity, closely controlled environment in which to observe serious errors by at-risk drivers. We determined how such unsafe events are predicted by visual and cognitive factors sensitive to decline in aging and AD. SETTING: The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, and the Iowa Driving Simulator. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine licensed drivers: 21 with AD and 18 controls without dementia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We determined the number of crashes and related performance errors and analyzed how these occurrences were predicted by visual and cognitive factors. RESULTS: Six participants (29%) with AD experienced crashes vs 0 of 18 control participants (P = .022). Drivers with AD were more than twice as likely to experience close calls (P = .042). Plots of critical control factors in the moments preceding a crash revealed patterns of driver in-attention and error. Strong predictors of crashes included visuospatial impairment, reduction in the useful field of view, and reduced perception of 3-dimensional structure-from-motion. CONCLUSIONS: High-fidelity driving simulation provides a unique new source of performance parameters to standardize the assessment of driver fitness. Detailed observations of crashes and other safety errors provide unbiased evidence to aid in the difficult clinical decision of whether older or medically impaired individuals should continue to drive. The findings are complementary to evidence currently being gathered using techniques from epidemiology and cognitive neuroscience.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.1997.00550170027011

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 231

Metadata

Authors
Rizzo, M., Reinach, S., McGehee, D., & Dawson, J.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
1997-05-01
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
545-551
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091635052
Cited by
231
References
0
FWCI
19.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulated Car Crashes and Crash Predictors in Drivers With Alzheimer Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1997.00550170027011
The paper
Rizzo, M., Reinach, S., McGehee, D., & Dawson, J. (1997). Simulated Car Crashes and Crash Predictors in Drivers With Alzheimer Disease. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1997.00550170027011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.