Cited by 469Older Adults Driving StudiesTraffic and Road SafetyHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Speed-of-Processing and Driving Simulator Training Result in Improved Driving Performance

Roenker, Daniel L., Cissell, Gayla M., Ball, Karlene K., Wadley, Virginia G., Edwards, Jerri D.·2003·Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Abstract

Useful field of view, a measure of processing speed and spatial attention, can be improved with training. We evaluated the effects of this improvement on older adults' driving performance. Elderly adults participated in a speed-of-processing training program ( N = 48), a traditional driver training program performed in a driving simulator ( N = 22), or a low-risk reference group ( N = 25). Before training, immediately after training or an equivalent time delay, and after an 18-month delay each participant was evaluated in a driving simulator and completed a 14-mile (22.5-km) open-road driving evaluation. Speed-of-processing training, but not simulator training, improved a specific measure of useful field of view (UFOV®), transferred to some simulator measures, and resulted in fewer dangerous maneuvers during the driving evaluation. The simulator-trained group improved on two driving performance measures: turning into the correct lane and proper signal use. Similar effects were not observed in the speed-of-processing training or low-risk reference groups. The persistence of these effects over an 18-month test interval was also evaluated. Actual or potential applications of this research include driver assessment and/or training programs and cognitive intervention programs for older adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1518/hfes.45.2.218.27241

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Performance on the UFOV has been shown to predict driving problems and interventions aimed at speed dual-task processing have been shown to reduce accidents in older drivers.

    “Performance on the UFOV has been shown to predict driving problems and interventions aimed at speed dual-task processing have been shown to reduce accidents in older drivers. 30”

    From Domains of cognition and their assessment (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roenker, D. L., Cissell, G. M., Ball, K. K., Wadley, V. G., & Edwards, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Western Kentucky University (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Venue
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Published
2003-06
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
218-233
ISSN
  • 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-8181
OpenAlex
W2105276643
Cited by
469
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 33
FWCI
40.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r44ag009727-02a2)
  • National Institute on Aging (R44AG09727)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Older Adults Driving Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
speed of processing training, useful field of view, driving simulator training, older adults, driving performance, cognitive intervention, transfer of training, lane changing, driving assessment, cognitive aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attention, Automobile Driving, Computer Simulation, Humans, Middle Aged, Reaction Time, United States, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review