Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Excitatory Amino Acids and Multiple Sclerosis: Evidence From Cerebrospinal Fluid

Sarchielli, Paola, Greco, Laura, Floridi, Ardesio, Floridi, Alessandro, Gallai, Virgilio·2003·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

Background Recent evidence suggests an altered glutamate homeostasis in the brain of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), as seen in experimental models of MS. Objective To test whether the excitotoxic insult contributes to the pathological process in MS by measuring glutamate and aspartate levels in the cerebrospinal fluid of MS patients and control individuals. Participants Twenty-five patients with the relapsing-remitting form of MS during a stable clinical phase, 30 patients with relapsing-remitting MS during relapse, and 25 patients with the secondary progressive form of MS were included in the study. Data were compared with those of 20 age-matched control subjects without diseases of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Methods Glutamate and aspartate levels in the cerebrospinal fluid were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Results Cerebrospinal fluid glutamate levels were significantly higher in patients assessed during relapse compared with those of the patients with relapsing-remitting MS examined during the stable clinical phase and the controls (P Conclusions Neurotoxic events occur in MS patients, and they can be responsible for oligodendrocyte and neuronal cell death in patients with this demyelinating disease. The manipulation of glutamate-altered homeostasis or antagonizing glutamate receptor-mediated excitotoxicity may have therapeutic implications in MS patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.60.8.1082

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sarchielli, P., Greco, L., Floridi, A., Floridi, A., & Gallai, V.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2003-08-01
Volume
60
Issue
8
Pages
1082
ISSN
0003-9942
Cited by
168
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review