The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Dry Eye Syndrome
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine risk factors for the prevalence of dry eye syndrome in a population-based cohort. METHODS: The prevalence of dry eye was determined by history at the second examination (1993-1995) of the Beaver Dam Eye Study cohort (N = 3722). RESULTS: The cohort was aged 48 to 91 years (mean +/- SD, 65 +/- 10 years) and 43% male. The overall prevalence of dry eye was 14.4%. Prevalence varied from 8.4% in subjects younger than 60 years to 19. 0% in those older than 80 years (P<.001 for test of trend). Age-adjusted prevalence in men was 11.4% compared with 16.7% in women (P<.001). After controlling for age and sex, the following factors were independently and significantly associated with dry eye in a logistic model: history of arthritis (odds ratio [OR], 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56-2.33), smoking status (past, OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.97-1.52; current, OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.36-2.46), caffeine use (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.91), history of thyroid disease (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.09-1.84), history of gout (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.02-1.96), total to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (OR, for 1 unit, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.99), diabetes (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.03-1.86), and multivitamin use (past, OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1. 01-1.81; current, OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.09-1.82). Nonsignificant variables included body mass; blood pressure; white blood cell count; hematocrit; history of osteoporosis, stroke, or cardiovascular disease; history of allergies; use of antihistamines, parasympathetics, antidepressants, diuretics, antiemetics, or other drying drugs; alcohol consumption; time spent outdoors; maculopathy; central cataract; and lens surgery. CONCLUSION: The results suggest several factors, such as smoking, caffeine use, and multivitamin use, could be studied for preventive or therapeutic efficacy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1264-1268
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
De Paiva, C. S., Corrales, R. M., Villarreal, A. L., Farley, W. J., Li, D.-Q., Stern, M. E., & Pflugfelder, S. C. (2006) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2006.02.004 · Cited by 451
Tear Film, Contact Lens, and Patient-Related Factors Associated with Contact Lens–Related Dry Eye
Nichols, J. J., & Sinnott, L. T. (2006) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.05-1392 · Cited by 409
Corneal nerves in health and disease
Al-Aqaba, M. A., Dhillon, V. K., Mohammed, I., Said, D. G., & Dua, H. S. (2019) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.05.003 · Cited by 303
The Eye, Oxidative Damage and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
Saccà, S. C., Cutolo, C. A., Ferrari, D., Corazza, P., & Traverso, C. E. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu10060668 · Cited by 150
Malhotra, C., Singh, S., Chakma, P., & Jain, A. K. (2015) · Cornea · doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000000446 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Moss, S. E.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-09-01
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1264
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138321161
- Cited by
- 1,222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Dry Eye Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.118.9.1264
- The paper
- Moss, S. E. (2000). Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Dry Eye Syndrome. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.118.9.1264
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.