The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tear Film, Contact Lens, and Patient-Related Factors Associated with Contact Lens–Related Dry Eye
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine tear film, contact lens, medical, and patient-related factors associated with self-reported contact lens-related dry eye. METHODS: Four hundred fifteen contact lens wearers were recruited and enrolled in this phase of a larger cross-sectional study. A variety of tear film (e.g., interferometry, osmolality, phenol red thread, meibography, fluorescein, and lissamine green staining), contact lens (i.e., water content, refractive index, material), and patient-related (e.g., gender, sociodemographic, education, income, and medical health) factors were examined in relation to dry eye status. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the relation between these tear film, contact lens, and patient-related factors associated with dry eye status. RESULTS: Of the 415 enrolled, the data from 360 were used in the analyses. The average age was 31.1 +/- 11.5 years, 245 (68%) participants were female, and 55.3% were classified as having-contact lens-related dry eye via self-report. Overall, 327 (90.8%) were hydrogel lens wearers and 33 (9.2%) were gas-permeable lens wearers. Several factors were shown to be related to dry eye status in multivariate modeling, including female gender (P = 0.007), lenses with higher nominal water content (P = 0.002), rapid prelens tear film thinning time (P = 0.008), frequent usage of over-the-counter pain medication (P = 0.02), limbal injection (P = 0.03), and increased tear film osmolality (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Contact lens-related dry eye may be explained mechanistically by increased tear film thinning times (evaporation or dewetting) resulting in increased tear film osmolality. Other contributing factors include the use of high-water-content lenses, which have traditionally been reported to be associated with less patient comfort than lower-water-content lenses, potentially due to spoilation and deposition. As found in other studies of dry eye, women are more likely to report contact lens-related dry eye than are men.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes.
Lemp, M. A. (1995) · PubMed · Cited by 1,705
Grading Of Corneal and Conjunctival Staining in the Context of Other Dry Eye Tests
Bron, A. J., Evans, V. E., & Smith, J. A. (2003) · Cornea · doi:10.1097/00003226-200310000-00008 · Cited by 1,446
Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among US women
Schaumberg, D. A., Sullivan, D. A., Buring, J. E., & Dana, M. R. (2003) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00218-6 · Cited by 1,225
Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Dry Eye Syndrome
Moss, S. E. (2000) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.118.9.1264 · Cited by 1,222
Prevalence of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan
Lin, P.-Y., Tsai, S.-Y., Cheng, C., Liu, J., Chou, P., & Hsu, W. (2003) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(03)00262-8 · Cited by 597
Prevalence and associations of dry eye syndrome in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study
Chia, E., Mitchell, P., Rochtchina, E., Lee, A. J., Maroun, R., & Wang, J. J. (2003) · Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00634.x · Cited by 427
Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses
Bruinsma, G. M., van der Mei, H. C., & Busscher, H. J. (2001) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00159-4 · Cited by 417
Hyperosmolar Saline Is a Proinflammatory Stress on the Mouse Ocular Surface
Luo, L., Li, D.-Q., Corrales, R. M., & Pflugfelder, S. C. (2005) · Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1097/01.icl.0000162759.79740.46 · Cited by 340
Cited by
Lubrication of Articular Cartilage
Jahn, S., Seror, J., & Klein, J. (2016) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-081514-123305 · Cited by 406
Paper-based microfluidic system for tear electrolyte analysis
Yetisen, A. K., Jiang, N., Tamayol, A., Ruiz-Esparza, G. U., Zhang, Y. S., Medina-Pando, S., Gupta, A., Wolffsohn, J. S., Butt, H., Khademhosseini, A., et al. (2017) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c6lc01450j · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Nichols, J. J., & Sinnott, L. T.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2006-04-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1319
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2146743491
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 11.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tear Film, Contact Lens, and Patient-Related Factors Associated with Contact Lens–Related Dry Eye. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.05-1392
- The paper
- Nichols, J. J., & Sinnott, L. T. (2006). Tear Film, Contact Lens, and Patient-Related Factors Associated with Contact Lens–Related Dry Eye. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-1392
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.