The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Goblet Cell Numbers and Epithelial Proliferation in the Conjunctiva of Patients With Dry Eye Syndrome Treated With Cyclosporine
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare conjunctival goblet cell numbers as well as epithelial turnover in patients with non-Sjögren syndrome--associated keratoconjunctivitis sicca (NSS-KCS) and those with SS-KCS before and after 6 months of treatment with topical cyclosporine A (CsA) ophthalmic emulsion. METHODS: Conjunctival biopsy specimens from 16 patients with NSS-KCS and 12 with SS-KCS were obtained at baseline and after 6 months' therapy with CsA or vehicle alone. Conjunctival biopsy specimens were also obtained from 11 normal subjects. Periodic acid--Schiff staining determined the number of goblet cells present. Immunofluorescence microscopy for Ki-67 localization was used to evaluate the number of actively cycling cells. RESULTS: Periodic acid--Schiff staining showed fewer goblet cells at baseline in both dry eye populations when compared with normal subjects (P<.001). After 6 months of CsA treatment, conjunctival biopsy specimens of both NSS-KCS and SS-KCS groups revealed an increase in goblet cells compared with baseline (P<.05). More Ki-67--positive cells were observed in NSS-KCS conjunctiva at baseline than in normal conjunctiva (P<.05) whereas numbers of these cells in SS-KCS conjunctiva were similar to normal at baseline. After 6 months of CsA treatment, conjunctival biopsy specimens of NSS-KCS revealed a decrease in Ki-67--labeled cells compared with baseline (P<.001). In contrast, no substantial change was observed for CsA treatment in patients with SS-KCS. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of dry eye syndrome for 6 months with topical CsA resulted in an increase in goblet cell numbers in patients with NSS-KCS and SS-KCS and a decrease in epithelial turnover in those with NSS-KCS. Reducing ocular surface inflammation might have an effect on the proliferative activity of the epithelium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dry Eye–Induced Conjunctival Epithelial Squamous Metaplasia Is Modulated by Interferon-γ
De Paiva, C. S., Villarreal, A. L., Corrales, R. M., Rahman, H. T., Chang, V. Y., Farley, W. J., Stern, M. E., Niederkorn, J. Y., Li, D.-Q., & Pflugfelder, S. C. (2007) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0069 · Cited by 320
Diao, H., Jiao, A. R., Yu, B., Mao, X. B., & Chen, D. W. (2019) · Genes & Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s12263-019-0626-x · Cited by 139
Topical, aqueous, clear cyclosporine formulation design for anterior and posterior ocular delivery
Cholkar, K., Gilger, B. C., & Mitra, A. K. (2015) · Translational Vision Science & Technology · doi:10.1167/tvst.4.3.1 · Cited by 103
Tauber, J., Schechter, B. A., Bacharach, J., Toyos, M. M., Smyth-Medina, R., Weiss, S. L., & Luchs, J. I. (2018) · Clinical ophthalmology · doi:10.2147/opth.s175065 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Kunert, K. S.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 330
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099738114
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Goblet Cell Numbers and Epithelial Proliferation in the Conjunctiva of Patients With Dry Eye Syndrome Treated With Cyclosporine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.120.3.330
- The paper
- Kunert, K. S. (2002). Goblet Cell Numbers and Epithelial Proliferation in the Conjunctiva of Patients With Dry Eye Syndrome Treated With Cyclosporine. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.120.3.330
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.