Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 733

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema

Aiello, L. M., Ferris, F. L.·1987·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

To the Editor. —In the December 1985 issue of theArchiveswe published data from the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) that demonstrated that focal photocoagulation of "clinically significant" diabetic macular edema substantially reduces the risk of visual loss.1As part of the ongoing monitoring of the 23 clinics in this study, we discovered that one of our clinics was not carefully following the study protocol. As a consequence, their data cannot be considered comparable with data from the other clinics. No data from this clinic will be included in any future ETDRS analyses or publications. We have reproduced all of the figures and tables presented in the December 1985 article after deleting the data from this clinic and find essentially no changes in our published results (Table). For example, the Figure shows the comparison of the percentage of eyes that experienced visual loss of 15 or more letters

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archopht.1987.01060090021004

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Aiello, L. M., & Ferris, F. L.
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
1987-09-01
Volume
105
Issue
9
Pages
1163-1163
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002725667
Cited by
733
References
0
FWCI
14.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.