The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk Factors for the Development of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss in Ocular Hypertension
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To detect characteristics of persons with ocular hypertension that are associated with a higher risk of future glaucomatous field loss. METHODS: Annual examinations of the optic disc, nerve fiber layer, and visual field in 647 persons with bilateral intraocular pressure higher than 21 mmHg and initially normal visual field test results with the Goldmann perimeter. RESULTS: Sixty-eight persons developed a field defect on two consecutive Goldmann visual field tests in at least one eye, while 579 others retained normal fields. Moderate or severe nerve fiber layer atrophy at baseline was associated with a seven to eight times greater risk of development of visual field loss. Attributes that were significantly associated with the incidence of field loss included older age, larger cup-disc ratio, smaller rim-disc area ratio, larger cup asymmetry, presence of disc crescent, and higher intraocular pressure. Characteristics found not to be associated with incidence were gender, race, hypertension, diabetes, refractive error, family history of glaucoma, smoking or alcohol drinking history, and disc area. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing nerve fiber layer atrophy judged by a semiquantitative grading system was associated with increasing risk of development of visual field loss among persons with ocular hypertension. The relationship of the development of field loss to race, myopia, family history of glaucoma, and medical history are more complex than has been presumed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Racial Differences in the Cause-Specific Prevalence of Blindness in East Baltimore
Sommer, A., Tielsch, J. M., Katz, J., Quigley, H. A., Gottsch, J. D., Javitt, J. C., Martone, J. F., Royall, R. M., Witt, K. A., & Ezrine, S. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199111143252004 · Cited by 764
Self-citation
Cited by
The Prevalence of Glaucoma in a Population-Based Study of Hispanic Subjects: Proyecto VER
Quigley, H. A. (2001) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.119.12.1819 · Cited by 593
Self-citationRudnicka, A. R., Mt-Isa, S., Owen, C. G., Cook, D. G., & Ashby, D. (2006) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0299 · Cited by 502
Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern®
Gedde, S. J., Vinod, K., Wright, M. M., Muir, K. W., Lind, J. T., Chen, P. P., Li, T., & Mansberger, S. L. (2021) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.022 · Cited by 474
The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: Design and Baseline Description of the Participants
Gordon, M. O. (1999) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.117.5.573 · Cited by 441
Open-angle Glaucoma and Diabetes
Mitchell, P., Smith, W., Chey, T., & Healey, P. R. (1997) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30247-4 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Quigley, H. A.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1994-05-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 644
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968169793
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Factors for the Development of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss in Ocular Hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.1994.01090170088028
- The paper
- Quigley, H. A. (1994). Risk Factors for the Development of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss in Ocular Hypertension. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1994.01090170088028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.