Cited by 147

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Impact of Retail Cigarette Marketing Practices on Youth Smoking Uptake

Slater, Sandy J., Chaloupka, Frank J., Wakefield, Melanie, Johnston, Lloyd D., O’Malley, Patrick M.·2007·Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine

Abstract

Objective To examine the differential associations of cigarette retail marketing practices on youth smoking uptake. Design Analyses from annual, nationally representative, cross-sectional surveys of 8th, 10th, and 12th graders in the United States. Setting The February 1999 through June 2003 Monitoring the Future surveys involved 109,308 students and data on retail cigarette marketing collected from 966 communities in which the students reside, as part of the Bridging the Gap Initiative: Research Informing Practice and Policy for Healthy Youth Behavior. Participants A total of 26,301 students were selected for this study. Main exposures Point-of-sale advertising, promotions, prices, and placement. Outcome measure Using a smoking uptake measure to account for stages that identify the process by which adolescents begin smoking, we calculated odds ratios and confidence intervals through generalized ordered logit analyses, with weighted data that controlled for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and accounted for clustering at the community level. Results Higher levels of advertising, lower cigarette prices, and greater availability of cigarette promotions were associated with smoking uptake. Advertising increased the likelihood of youth initiating smoking, price increased the likelihood of smoking at most levels of uptake, and availability of promotions increased the likelihood that youth will move from experimentation to regular smoking. Conclusions Cigarette retail…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpedi.161.5.440

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Slater, S. J., Chaloupka, F. J., Wakefield, M., Johnston, L. D., & O’Malley, P. M.
Venue
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Published
2007-05-01
Volume
161
Issue
5
Pages
440
ISSN
1072-4710
Cited by
147
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review