The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Impact of Retail Cigarette Marketing Practices on Youth Smoking Uptake
Abstract
Objective To examine the differential associations of cigarette retail marketing practices on youth smoking uptake. Design Analyses from annual, nationally representative, cross-sectional surveys of 8th, 10th, and 12th graders in the United States. Setting The February 1999 through June 2003 Monitoring the Future surveys involved 109,308 students and data on retail cigarette marketing collected from 966 communities in which the students reside, as part of the Bridging the Gap Initiative: Research Informing Practice and Policy for Healthy Youth Behavior. Participants A total of 26,301 students were selected for this study. Main exposures Point-of-sale advertising, promotions, prices, and placement. Outcome measure Using a smoking uptake measure to account for stages that identify the process by which adolescents begin smoking, we calculated odds ratios and confidence intervals through generalized ordered logit analyses, with weighted data that controlled for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and accounted for clustering at the community level. Results Higher levels of advertising, lower cigarette prices, and greater availability of cigarette promotions were associated with smoking uptake. Advertising increased the likelihood of youth initiating smoking, price increased the likelihood of smoking at most levels of uptake, and availability of promotions increased the likelihood that youth will move from experimentation to regular smoking. Conclusions Cigarette retail…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The resulting lower prices attract and keep customers and are especially attractive to pricesensitive young buyers. 44,46,51”
From Tobacco Industry Promotional Strategies Targeting American Indians/Alaska Natives and Exploiting Tribal Sovereignty (2019) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The impact of tobacco promotion at the point of sale: A systematic review
Paynter, J., & Edwards, R. (2009) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntn002 · Cited by 321
Henriksen, L., Feighery, E. C., Schleicher, N. C., Cowling, D. W., Kline, R. S., & Fortmann, S. P. (2008) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.04.008 · Cited by 299
Lempert, L. K., & Glantz, S. A. (2019) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/nty048 · Cited by 53
Tobacco Industry Marketing, Population-Based Tobacco Control, and Smoking Behavior
Pierce, J. P. (2007) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.007 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Slater, S. J., Chaloupka, F. J., Wakefield, M., Johnston, L. D., & O’Malley, P. M.
- Venue
- Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 440
- ISSN
- 1072-4710
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review