Cited by 321Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologySubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The impact of tobacco promotion at the point of sale: A systematic review

Paynter, Janine, Edwards, Richard·2009·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco promotion increases the likelihood that adolescents will start smoking. Much of the tobacco industry's promotional budget is spent on point of sale (PoS) promotion in many jurisdictions. Consequently, tobacco is an eye-catching feature at the PoS in many places. METHODS: We reviewed the evidence that PoS tobacco promotion influences key smoking-related behaviors and beliefs, increases susceptibility to smoking in youth, undermines smokers' quit attempts, and promotes relapse among ex-smokers. RESULTS: We found 12 peer-reviewed studies, 10 of which were focused on children. Seven of 8 observational studies found statistically significant associations between exposure to tobacco promotion at the PoS and smoking initiation or susceptibility to smoking. Two experimental studies of children found statistically significant associations between exposure to PoS tobacco promotions and beliefs about ease of getting tobacco and smoking prevalence among their peers. An experimental study with adults found that a picture of collected tobacco pack elicited cravings for cigarettes among smokers. A cross-sectional study found that 25% of adult smokers reported impulse purchasing and a third of recent ex-smokers reported urges to start smoking after seeing tobacco displayed. DISCUSSION: More prospective studies are needed to clarify the temporal relationship between exposure to PoS tobacco and outcome. However, given the addictiveness of tobacco, the severity of the health hazards posed by smoking, the evidence that tobacco promotion encourages children to start smoking, and the consistency of the evidence that PoS promotion influences children's smoking, we believe that ample justification exists for banning PoS advertising and displays of smoked tobacco products.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/ntn002

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paynter, J., & Edwards, R.
Affiliations
Action on Smoking and Health (GB)
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2009-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
25-35
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
OpenAlex
W2163432696
Cited by
321
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
tobacco advertising, smoking initiation, adolescent smoking, impulse buying, smoking urges, tobacco industry marketing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Advertising, Commerce, Humans, Persuasive Communication, Photic Stimulation, Risk Factors, Smoking, Social Environment, Suggestion, United States, Tobacco Industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review