The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Well They Remember: The Accuracy of Parent Reports
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the range of accuracy of parent recall for many different events when compared with pediatrician's records and to establish whether good recall is associated with the nature of the event, period of recall, or demographic characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN: A nonconcurrent, descriptive survey of previous events. SETTING: Two pediatric group practices in Montreal, Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighty-eight parents of children aged 1 to 13 years. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS/MAIN RESULTS: Parents' responses to a self-administered questionnaire were compared with information extracted from pediatricians' records. The health events studied included asthma, bronchitis, otitis media, accidents, hospitalizations, office visits, and birth weight. Most parents (73%) were able to recall birth weight within 50 g, and 85% reported a frequency of hospitalizations that agreed exactly with the record. For asthma, bronchitis, and otitis in the last year, the percentages with good agreement were 91%, 85%, and 51%, respectively, while for the same disorders during the child's lifetime, the corresponding figures were 87%, 74%, and 53%, respectively. Each parent's responses were classified according to overall quality of agreement; associations between agreement and respondent characteristics were investigated. Mothers responded more accurately than fathers, and parents of younger children also showed better recall. Other factors, eg, education and occupation, were not significantly correlated with recall. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with pediatricians' records, parent reports are generally acceptable for most research purposes and may be a better source for some health events such as accidents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The accuracy of parental recall of aspects of child development and of child rearing practices
Robbins, L. C. (1963) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0049084 · Cited by 177
Cited by
Prevalence and treatment of depression, anxiety, and conduct problems in US children
Ghandour, R. M., Sherman, L. J., Vladutiu, C. J., Ali, M. M., Lynch, S. E., Bitsko, R. H., & Blumberg, S. J. (2019) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.09.021 · Cited by 1,135
Wilson, B. J., Watson, M. S., Prescott, G. J., Sunderland, S., Campbell, D. M., Hannaford, P., & Smith, W. C. S. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7394.845 · Cited by 723
Evidence That School-Age Children Can Self-Report on Their Health
Riley, A. W. (2004) · Ambulatory Pediatrics · doi:10.1367/a03-178r.1 · Cited by 595
An Epidemiologic Profile of Children With Special Health Care Needs
Newacheck, P. W., Strickland, B., Shonkoff, J. P., Perrin, J. M., McPherson, M., McManus, M., Lauver, C., Fox, H., & Arango, P. (1998) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.102.1.117 · Cited by 573
The prevalence of parent-reported autism spectrum disorder among US children
Kogan, M. D., Vladutiu, C. J., Schieve, L. A., Ghandour, R. M., Blumberg, S. J., Zablotsky, B., Perrin, J. M., Shattuck, P., Kuhlthau, K. A., Harwood, R. L., et al. (2018) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2017-4161 · Cited by 354
Metadata
- Authors
- Pless, C. E.
- Venue
- Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1995-05-01
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 553
- ISSN
- 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993326495
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Well They Remember: The Accuracy of Parent Reports. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170180083016
- The paper
- Pless, C. E. (1995). How Well They Remember: The Accuracy of Parent Reports. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170180083016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.